Argumentative Essay On Death Penalty

Another argument is that death penalty is not a constraining factor. The most common argument for death penalty says that this measure of punishment is a strong restraining factor, since killing of a felon keeps others from committing similar crimes. At a first glance, this argument seems quite reasonable. However, it is important to approach the question of death penalty less disconcertingly. Effectiveness margins exist not only in death penalty, but also in other types of punishment, and that is not always taken into account ("Arguments for and Against the Death Penalty.").
According to researchers of this issue, people committing crimes, rely on a chance of avoiding punishment, no matter what it is. Therefore there is basically no difference between a criminal being sentenced to death or to life imprisonment. Since numerous research studies on the subject provide no proof of death penalty affecting the crime rate and due to some methodological difficulties associated with studies on the subject, we should not use a hypothesis about restraining effect of death penalty as a bottom-line argument against the public opinion on this case ("The Facts: 13 Reasons to Oppose the
It means that in countries, which practice death penalty, the rate of grave crimes should be expected to be lower, than in countries, where death penalty is not applicable. In addition, we should anticipate increase in the rate of such crimes in countries, where death penalty used to be applied, but was abolished and, conversely, decrease in the rate of such crimes in the countries, where this measure of punishment has been recently introduced. However, none of the researches managed to prove the existence connection between death penalty and crime rate ("The Facts: 13 Reasons to Oppose the Death