Argumentative Essay: Daniel Keyes Flowers For Algernon

“Flowers for Algernon” Argumentative Essay Charlie Gordon should not have been the subject of the experiment. While Daniel Keyes in “Flowers for Algernon” portrayed hope for a mentally impaired man, Charlie Gordon, the operation failed with devastating consequences! Before the surgery, Charlie desperately longed to be a member of a society that he was unable to completely comprehend. Charlie, as a genius, was permitted to witness the horrendous actions towards those with mental ailments. Additionally, Charlie was viewed as an experiment, deserving no rights or respect. After the surgery, once again could not relate and function normally in society, which was his only desire. Lastly, Charlie, the genius, understood that the effects of the surgery were, unfortunately, temporary. Through Charlie’s investigation of Algernon’s life, it became apparent that the operation was a failure. Although Charlie enjoyed his time of being a genius, he was saddened to see how society truly was. The operation enabled Charlie to realize, recognize the atrocious treatment he had been receiving from society. He became conscious to the fact that Joe and Frank were not his friends, rather; they treated him as a child, incapable of defending himself. In fact, they used a phrase as a way to mock Charlie’s behavior. Soon Charlie learned that the phrase, “pull a Charlie
Obviously, the surgery was a failure! Since Algernon died, Charlie realistically could expect his own demise. Although, Charlie’s intellect soared beyond specified predictions, the failure of the surgery- quite shocking to Charlie- was an uncontrollable variable! The doctors, opportunists, could not rectify, remedy this traumatic outcome. Only Charlie, the genius, could analyze the surgery’s inherent problematic components. At this point, Charlie did not regret the surgery; nevertheless, he should not have been the experimental