Preview

In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important discoveries

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
450 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important discoveries
The speaker asserts the important discoveries in any field of inquiry are more likely made by the beginners, but not the experts. I strongly disagree with this view because it is an extreme one. Though I concede that some important discoveries may be attributed to the work of novices, but this situation is not a prevail phenomenon in all fields. Most of achievements people acquire are dependent on the research of experts.

Admittedly, beginners could contribute to some important discoveries because their thought might not be confined by existed thinking patterns. To research on a specific discipline, beginner is regarded as freshmen to some extent. Though the lack of experience may hinder them to acquire further progress, on the other hand, this may be an opportunity for them to think and research in ways different with mainstream methods. For example, Einstein, his distinguished Theory of Relativity was created only through he takes another way against the dominated theory constructed by Newton. The birth of such a break came from a beginner but not experts.

However, experts have much experience which is one of the most important factors to the birth of great discoveries. As we know, a building could be constructed only after the basement is founded. Experts are people who research in a specific area of discipline, they know the previous and nowadays, theories, data and trends in this area clearly, which can help them to make progress in objects they engaged in. Newton, a famous scientist, made many great discoveries in physics. What he said about his achievement is that only he stands the shoulder of giants so he can see further. This is the best generalization why discoveries are made by experts.

Furthermore, most of research on many fields is a time-consuming and rigorous works and call s for persons who devote all his time and energy on them. Common sense told us that it usually takes a person many years to make a discovery. That is an energy-consuming work.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    To what extent is this true in you prescribed texts and AT LEAST 1 TEXT OF YOUR OWN…

    • 922 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle Vs Lavoisier

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Looking at the same information from different perspectives paves the way for progress because it allows for the same information to be seen from different views to allow more ideas about the information, like in the case of Aristotle vs. Lavoisier and the case of Mendeleev and the periodic table.…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "An Individuals process of discovery can be provocative and confronting but it can ultimately lead to new perspectives of ourselves and others around us" (Robert Grey and related text) (900 words)…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When deciding whether or not mistakes are a part to making discoveries, the sides are pretty evened out. But with this essay, the siding is that mistakes are a key part to making discoveries. Let’s get into it.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Science Barry

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Though science is often considered a field for those who want concrete answers and find speculation something beneath them, John M. Barry reveals quite the opposite. Through this passage, Barry shows his reader through numerous rhetorical strategies that scientific research is actually a field for the daring and courageous willing to be left unsure of most answers and rely on faith that someday their work will yield something of importance on the subject.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When reading this it dawned on me that if I ever really want to understand or learn something that I could engage a research project of the desired subject. It is apparently one of the best ways to gain the desired understanding in a relatively short…

    • 598 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    rhetorical essay

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages

    By juxtaposing the antithetical concepts of “certainty” and “uncertainty,” and by emphasizing the exceptional burdens of the latter, Barry compels his readers to acknowledge the courage that is required of any successful scientists and, indeed, to appreciate the unnatural skills that a scientist must possess in order to “overcome significant obstacles.” He effectively argues that uncertainty, though a weakness, is a cross that all scientists must bear and that, in order to become a successful scientist at all, one must first recognize that weakness and then persevere in spite of it. To the casual observer, venturing into the unknown might seem the more courageous feat of the scientists, but, as the allusion to Bernard’s quote reveals, the most courageous feat, and what science endeavors to teach most of all, is “to doubt” – that is, to be uncertain and to work with the discomfort of that uncertainty.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Do you know many scientists use 10% or more of the time they live to discover complicated things? Mistakes happen every day. Mistakes usually lead to problems but sometimes these mistakes lead to discovery. Small mistakes can cause big trouble. Everyday everybody makes mistakes but every day we don't discover new things.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This research technique may seem narrow minded but in fact, according to Kuhn, is essential in the development of science. When a researcher narrows his search he is inclined to look at a certain aspect of science in great detail. This inevitably leads to either a positive or negative outcome for the researcher. When the result fails to coexist with the original theory the focus of the research begins to shift.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The evolving nature of research makes it inaccurate with time. Take for instance the telecommunications industry. Several research studies have been conducted by many scientists on the need to have a perfect communication system. Alexander Graham Bell performed endless experiments that would prove his communication theory real. Modern scientists have now partnered with wireless cell phone companies to design efficient and effective communication systems that provide faster and reliable connectivity among customers. The result is the creation of cell phones such as i-phones, androids, and blackberries. Research…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    uses nature-and-physical based metaphors along with references to outside figures and clear & concise diction to help the readers understand that research and pioneering is essential the field of science, and without those first few who take the time to create a rough path, knowledge could never evolve and be of use.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas says, "What is needed, for progress to be made, is the move based on the error." Most discoveries are made by accident. Productive mistakes are everywhere: science, medicine, history, and so on. For example, a pharmaceutical company developed Viagra as a heart medication, and it was to their surprise that the drug effectively benefited those suffering from erectile dysfunction. Accidents like this happen everyday, and sometimes, they can have a positive outcome.…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Research is “an original investigation undertaken in order to contribute to knowledge and understanding and, in the case of some disciplines, cultural innovation or aesthetic refinement” according to Performance Based Research Fund Quality Evaluation Guidelines. People with specialized knowledge in their respective fields conduct independent creative, cumulative and often long-term research activities. The basic reason for humans to do research is their curiosity. It makes them explore and find reasonable explanations or answers for the problems with proper justification. This paper provides a discussion on why perfect research is not a possibility.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    At the same time, the unstopped experiment made by Alfred Nobel can illustrate my idea. Alfred Nobel owes his irreplaceable fame as an inventor of dynamite. Alfred Nobel cultivated great interest in science, especially in explosive, since very young under the influence of his father. Alfred Nobel engaged himself into experiments to find a more powerful and stable…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Ancient times in Greece and later on in the rest of Europe after the Renaissance, there were several advances in the area of natural sciences. For example, Eratosthenes, an ancient Greek scientist, was the first to make an accurate prediction of the diameter of the Earth (Science). If Eratosthenes had no interesting in finding out what the Earth 's diameter was or either proving or disproving a previous statement made on it, then he would 've never contributed to this area of knowledge. Since this scientist lived in Ancient Greece, his curiosity and questions about the world surrounding him weren 't oppressed, therefore he managed to make a contribution to science. Another example of doubt increasing knowledge in the area of…

    • 1245 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays