Antony And Brutus Persuasive Essay

Based on these two speeches, it’s quite obvious who won the crowd over. It was Antony, but him and Brutus had similar tactics in how to persuade the audience. Along with that, they also had many different ways they persuaded.Some of the similarities and differences will be listed. Altogether though, Antony and Brutus both had very persuading speeches. Antony and Brutus used quite a few of the same tactics to persuade the audience. They both used ethos to try to make the audience relate more to one over the other. “Believe me for mine honor” (III, ii, 14). Here, Brutus is asking the people to listen to him and believe him because of his reputation as an honorable person. Almost in the same way, Antony tries to make himself more relatable to the crowd by referring to himself as if he were one of them “Friends, Romans, and Countrymen…” (III, ii, 72). Even though Antony and Brutus had many things in common throughout their speeches, they also had a few differences.The main difference is that Antony had a much better use of rhetoric. He used to sarcasm to make the people realize Brutus isn’t very honorable “For Brutus is an honorable man; So are they all, all honorable men” (III, ii 81-83). Brutus, on the other hand, tried to use pathos, or emotion, to make the people think that if Caesar were still alive, they’d all be slaves, or dead “Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar
Brutus tried to get the people to see how emotionally torn he was about murdering Caesar. On the other hand, Antony used logic and rhetoric to make the people notice that Brutus really was a bad person, without saying it directly. Some of the tactics used were compared and contrasted, along with some of the fallacies used by each of them. Altogether, both of the speeches were quite impactful, but it’s quite obvious that Antony’s was much more influential on the