Preview

Animal Testing Rhetorical Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
399 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Animal Testing Rhetorical Analysis
PETA explains that animal testing wastes lives, both human and animal. They also focus on the viewpoints of both sides of animal testing throughout the piece. While each viewpoint has some accuracy within the article a persuasive technique for the reader is not clear.
Analysis Response: PETA, or people for the ethical treatment of animals, begins their argument with many facts from studies proving that they have credible information. Unfortunately, the information they present throughout the article does not effectively support that animal testing is in fact bad science. Within the piece there are points and counterpoints which contradict each other thus throwing off the overall effectiveness. These points may confuse the reader with
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis Of Rodents
    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page

    Rhetorical Analysis Of Rodents

    The argument was good went straight to the point which narrow any trouble of finding made me like that about it.…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal Testing Pros And Cons
    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page

    Animal Testing Pros And Cons

    The Peta website provides information and facts against animal testing. It contains practices that are done on innocent animals for research such as cosmetic, scientific, experimentation, and drug purposes. The animals that are used for unethical research consists of fish, mice, monkeys, dogs, birds and rabbits. The website describes the unethical procedures that they do on innocent animals. Animals are forced to breath in very toxic fumes and have their head drilled before they die. The innocent animals are treated inhumanely since they are treated as lab equipment rather than animals.…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Animal Farm Rhetorical Analysis
    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Animal Farm Rhetorical Analysis

    In Animal Farm, George Orwell uses logos in almost every speech that any of the animals give. Logos means to persuade by the use of reasoning. He (George Orwell) mostly uses logos in the speeches that the loyal pig of Napoleon, Squealer, gives to all the animals on the farm. He uses logic in the speeches when he tries to persuade the animals about doing more work on the farm, or giving Napoleon more food than the rest of the animals.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Animal Farm Rhetorical Analysis
    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Animal Farm Rhetorical Analysis

    In the novel, Animal Farm, by George Orwell, the abuse and injustice of political power is expressed through the animals on the farm. Orwell illustrates that any society which has leaders with absolute power is ultimately doomed to failure due to the inevitability of leaders manipulating power for their own personal benefit. First, Orwell highlights how the society’s ideologies can be manipulated and twisted by those in positions of social and political power. One example is that the pigs are trying to indoctrinate the other animals by making the others chant the slogan, “Four legs good, two legs bad” (22), serving no purpose other than to drown out dissenting opinion. Although the slogan seems to help the animals achieve their goals, it soon…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Heather Dunnuck Animal Testing
    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Heather Dunnuck Animal Testing

    Heather Dunnuck is a firm believer that animal testing is not justified. She published an article for Lone Star College, on why she supports this opinion. The article is a one sided, factual, and opinionated article that has the purpose of persuading and educating the targeted audience of why animal testing is not beneficial. Throughout the article the author uses emotional ties, statistics, quotes, and credible sources to persuade the audience of her belief. These strategies were presented clearly by Heather throughout the article, which helped the targeted audience relate to the authors opinion. In Heather Dunnuck’s article titled “Saving the Animals: Stop Animal Testing” the author does a phenomenal job persuading the…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Essay - Animal Rights
    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Rhetorical Essay - Animal Rights

    Epstein and Brook attempt to persuade the reader into believing animal rights are bad for society. They highlight many positive influences of animal testing, and explain to the reader the global implications of discontinuing testing. The logic offered is reasonably sound in theory, though it is a bit too harshly worded at times. Although evidence of the constructive qualities of medical testing on animals is provided,…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing
    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

    Overall, animal testing is erroneous because it does not contribute anything meaningfully to the world. When animals are tested often the results are irrelevant, due to the fact, animals have many differences from humans. Also, the animals endure poor conditions. Lastly, the animals’ lives are wasted by being tested on products that are not important. Testing animals is abusive and needs to…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Animal Experimentation Argument Analysis
    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Animal Experimentation Argument Analysis

    Questioning morality and ethics is the most complicated arguments out of the issues that circulate in the debate of animal experimentation. The defendants would argue that animals cannot be considered morally equal to humans. Most would comment something along the lines, “There is a hierarchy in nature, and denying it is not warranted” like Tibor R. Machan would describe the argument. The human moral community, for instance, is often characterized by a capacity to manipulate abstract concepts and by personal autonomy. Since most animals do not have the cognitive capabilities of humans and also do not seem to possess full autonomy (animals do not rationally choose to pursue specific life goals), they are not included in the moral community.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Persuasive Essay: Should Animals Be Used For Research?
    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Persuasive Essay: Should Animals Be Used For Research?

    `”God loved the birds and invented trees. Man loved the birds and invented cages” (Deval, Jacques). There are many things wrong about animal research, and I think that a lot of it is wrong. Animal testing is wrong because it harms animals, animals’ rights are violated in tests, it is expensive, there are better alternatives, and the results of these tests aren’t always accurate or reliable.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argumentative Essay: Are Animals Right Or Wrong?
    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Argumentative Essay: Are Animals Right Or Wrong?

    All of my life I have had a tremendous amount of passion for all animals, and in most instances I've found that I have felt more comfortable around them than I do people, finding myself drawn to their many personable qualities, such as innocence, loyalty, lack of judgment, and overall cheerful disposition. As I have grown, my care for animals and their well being has as well, and my eyes have been opened to the horrors taking place all throughout the globe involving poor, innocent animals, who are unable to defend themselves, against the very people they are meant to find companionship with. The controversy over the practice of utilizing animals for the purposes of testing has been an issue for the past 30-40 years, and with it, comes the moral debate. However, the topic of ongoing question, whether animal testing is right or wrong, lies within your own personal morals.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Satire On Animal Testing
    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Satire On Animal Testing

    Animals do not have a say once they are taken away from their current living space, and then killed or have to suffer through what the researchers put them through. These innocents now are being punished, abused, and now have more risks and a shortened life span. Realistically, in my opinion, in order to experiment on animals you really don’t have a heart. People who love animals, could never and would never experiment on them because the things that people do to them we really don’t deserve the satisfaction of animals. “Animals used in experiments are commonly subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation, prolonged periods of physical restraint, the infliction of burns and other wounds to study the healing process, the infliction of pain to study its effects and remedies, and "killing by carbon dioxide asphyxiation, neck-breaking, decapitation, or other means." This piece of textual evidence is explaining how animals are not treated properly while being used in experimentation. Animals are forced to do things unwanted to, and also are deprived of certain things. Consider the people who have to do this for a living- they are finding cures for us humans, and also testing products such as cosmetics and shampoos and making sure that we can use them. You may think that animal testing is beneficial, but it's not, it's putting animals life in danger. Rabbits are used to test cosmetics and shampoos, during this process rabbits are powerless and have their eyelids opened by clips this can occur for days. Moving forward, as you can see many animals are harmed during the process and it is very heartbreaking to hear about the many animals that are hurt or killed to find cures for us. If you anyone who loves animals, if animal experimentation is okay, they would say it was abusive, because you taking the life of an innocent animal and putting it in…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing - 18
    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Animal Testing - 18

    Several animal rights organizations, including the People for Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), have questioned the legitimacy of this practice wherein animals are subjected to torture in the name of 'scientific research'. Animal rights activists, along with animal lovers from across the world, are trying their best to get this inhumane practice outlawed. These people stress on the fact that there is no dearth of arguments against the practice - both on ethical and scientific…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Animal Cruelty In The United States
    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Animal Cruelty In The United States

    Peta came into public in 1981 when a family of seventeen macaque monkeys were being tested on, the members of this activist group stood outside the Behavioral Research center and protested. From then on they would be widely known all around the world. There is an ongoing argument that whether animal testing benefits us or is just cruel to the animals. According to Cruelty Free International, the U.S drug administry invests in a total of fifty billion dollars each year. One drug that is tested is Vioxx, it is used to treat arthritis. It was found to be “safe” and was tested on monkeys and five other animals species. Even though it’s been tested multiple times, this medicine has caused over 320,000 heart attacks and strokes, and 140,000 deaths. According to Peta, animal testing is a waste of time and money, and most importantly animals. Animals don’t contract the same diseases as humans do, one example Parkinson's disease and also HIV or alzheimer's. Yet there is an alternative to testing on animals, scientists have developed a way of actually growing human cells and making them into human organs which provides a more realistic way of testing. But on the other side, animal testing has had some benefits, in 1920 researchers removed the pancreas from a dog, this developed insulin therapy. Scientist today are…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Persuasive Paper
    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Persuasive Paper

    References: (n.d.). Animal testing is bad science:point/counterpoint . Retrieved from peta.org (n.d.). Alternatives to animal testing. Retrieved from peta.org (n.d.). Cruelty to animals in laboratories . Retrieved from peta.org (n.d.). Information about animal testing . Retrieved from peta.org…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Argumentative Topics
    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Animal Testing Argumentative Topics

    For the past decade, there have been a frequent amount of controversial issues/argumentative topics that people consider ethical or unethical, and I think one of those topics is argumentative topics is animal testing. Animal testing has been around for countless years now since the discovering of physiology as a new area of science. Physiology is a branch of biology that studies the function of a living organism, so the only way scientists could research and study this area is by testing animals since they were attainable living organism besides humans. In recent years the idea of animal testing has gotten worse due to the fact that a collection of animals has been killed or abused for tests, and people have realized that animals are creatures…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics