Preview

Ancient Roman Patrician Civil War

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
610 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ancient Roman Patrician Civil War
Introduction
Ancient Roman patricians unfairly divided the spoils of war in a way so that they benefited while the plebeian class sunk deeper into debt (Morey,n.d.). This, along with more provocation by the patricians such as an unfair distribution of public lands;plebeians being unable to hold office; as well as unfair, unwritten, and inaccessible laws lead to division between the two classes and the plebeians revolting.
Division Between Patricians and Plebeians Patricians and plebeians both worked together to overthrow the tyrannical Tarquin rule in 500 B.C.(Morey,n.d.). However, it was the plebeian class, who mainly resided in the war-torn territory of the countryside that felt the devastation of continual warfare the most. With their
…show more content…
Not surprisingly, those of the wealthy patrician class were the only ones allowed to enter into the offices established after Rome’s monarchy was overthrown. Also dividing the plebeians from the patricians was the access to the law. Patricians of Ancient Rome held onto the law as if it were an heirloom, only to be passed on to other patricians. Access to the law was a birthright for …show more content…
Officers of the tribune had to be plebeians and, as of 472 B.C., were elected by fellow plebeians . A new right granted to plebeians through this office was the ability to veto mandates. To protect this right and the officers, the tribune had diplomatic immunity in the sense that they could not be arrested. Also, those trying to impair them could be sentenced to death (Morey,n.d.). In addressing the issue of unequal division of public lands Spurius Cassius Viscellinus attempted to pass an agrarian law that would redistribute only the public Roman land more fairly. Unfortunately, patricians with political influence blocked the law and Cassius was sentenced to death. In an attempt to rectify these actions, patricians gave plebeians Aventine’s public land. In 462 B.C. Gaius Terentilius Harsa tried to establish a written law that both plebeians and patricians would be held to (Morey,n.d.). Because of opposition from patricians, it took ten years before a group of ten men, known as or the First Decemvirate were assigned the task of drafting a formal law. Unfortunately, the Second Decemvirate were dishonorable and their deeds resulted in a second succession. The result of this succession was the reinstatement of the old order and a newfound respect for plebeians from the patricians.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ap World History Dbq

    • 3642 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Consequences in the Roman Empire were also shown between the patricians and the plebeians. During the fifth century B.C.E, relations between the classes became so strained that the plebeians threatened to succeed from Rome and establish a rival settlement. This eventually led to the establishment of tribunes which altered the Roman government.…

    • 3642 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Monarchy is defined as ‘a form of government with a monarch at the head’ and was the first arrangement of power in Rome after its founding by Romulus, who reigned from 753-715BC.1 However, by 510BC, the despotic actions of Tarquinius Superbus marked the end of a succession of increasingly tyrannical kings, and the ‘Roman Republic’ was established. This system was based on a sharing of power between, foremost, two consuls who were elected by the people and held office for only one year, then 300 senators, and two popular assemblies, the comitia curiata and the comitia centuriata. With such a spread of auctoritas, the Roman state would be at less risk from corrupt men with their aims set on an autocratic rule. The precepts of the Roman republic were honourable and upheld, in the most part, until the civil wars of 91BC onwards disturbed it, culminating in what many would consider the fall of the Republic, and thus the establishment of a monarchy, with Augustus at the battle of Actium on 2nd September 31BC.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    APWH Rome and China Notes

    • 1379 Words
    • 5 Pages

    c This caused the Patricians to benefit greatly, but the plebeians did not. This caused a larger gap between the rich and poor.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Sallust stated, “Greed destroyed honor, honesty and taught men to be arrogant and cruel. Ambition made men false. Rome changed.” The Roman Republic was critically weakened between 78 and 49 BC. The underlying flaws within the structure of the Senate and the republic itself, political corruption and violence and the formation of the first triumvirate, which should not have been permitted under the democratic state, all contributed to its decline. Manipulating these decaying social and political conditions were significant individuals, who, despite the efforts of the senate, rose to prominence and power, which culminated in Civil war.…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the end of their term, they were held accountable to the popular assembly for any decisions made. "Position open only to patricians, plebeians became eligible in 367 BCE and by 342 BCE legislation dictated that one of the two consuls had to be a plebeian"(Roman Government). The Senate had limited legislative jurisdiction; it's initially available only to the patricians, indirect exclusive power. It had no proper authority, and significant influence was continued, working for an advisory body to the representatives. Individuals of the conservative organization were voluntary and labored for life except finding guilty of…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They were supposed to pay taxes and fight in battles. Which I think is wrong because nobody should be forced into battle. Plebs were also not allowed to vote in decision over wars and peace. They called the patrician the privileged class in Rome. They were the rich and had everything the plebs didn't. Plebes struggle with equal rights but soon got them.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    |Conflict of Orders- Patricians vs. Plebeians became a fight between the rich wealthy class and the majority peasant class |…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To obtain political rights, the common people (Plebeians) formed their own assembly, the Concillum Plebus and named their leaders tribunes.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome before 264BC

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Romans had a basic law of sorts, called the laws of the Twelve Tables. This governed a lot of Roman daily life and proceedings, and was the basis of a sort of equal rights scheme for the plebeian class. In addition to this, the Lex Hortensia, passed in 287BC, further blurred the distinctions between plebeians and patricians. The twelve tables, and any laws passed by a plebeian assembly, would now be binding to both plebeians and patricians, a sort of social justice.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Owners of latifundias operated at lower costs than did owners of smaller holdings. These owners often resulted to mortgaging their lands to aristocrats due to the fact that they could not compete with the latifundias. Thus, causing unemployment and famines for this class. These peasants moved to cities, where they became “mobs”. Wealthy patricians often hired people into personal armies. Civil wars i.e. Caesar and Pompey, often broke out between high ranking officials, thus leading to political instability. During the first and second century CE of Rome, there were social tensions due to the unequal land distribution. As a way to mend the unequal land distribution issue, reformers attempted to redistribute the land, i.e. Gracchi Brothers, Tiberius and Gaius. Unfortunately these men did not succeed due to the fact that most members of the wealthy and ruling classes disagreed with the ideas of the brothers and found their way around their redistribution method. In fact, this action caused them to pay a high price – their lives. For fear that the brothers would have a greater effect on Roman affairs, their enemies had them assassinated. Wang Mang, just as the Gracchi Brothers had attempted with Rome, tried to reform the distribution of land in China.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    * No law of succession, no method, the choice belonged to senate and people of rome.…

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Modern citizens can look to the life of Marcus Tullius Cicero as the paradigm of civic duty and good conscious. Not only did Cicero garner his offices solely through hard work, as a novus homo, but he also upheld the reputation of the Roman legal system, easily seen by his prosecution of Verres, the corrupt, ex-governor of Sicily. Cicero justifiably prosecuted Verres mainly due to Verres’s guilt and Cicero’s desire for power, thus proving Livy’s claim that the law is blind, for even a very wealthy, well connected man can still be found guilty.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    What was left was beginning to look less and less like the beloved Republic that brought Rome so much success as the lower class citizens began losing their ability to contribute to society. Their once beneficial rural augmentation of the Republic had become a burdensome urban problem. It is ironic to think that for all of the liberties that the poor gained during the struggle of the orders that they would eventually be denied the right to land; the one thing, with military loyalty attached, that made them most valuable because of the strength and unity they provided for the…

    • 2567 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Ancient Rome, patricians were known to be the ruling class of the society, while plebians were the peasants or commoners without opportunities to move upward on the social ladder. The lack of social mobility in Ancient Rome poses a comparison against modern time United States. One of the very core foundations of the U.S. is that citizens are encouraged to pursue the American dream. People still hold true the promise of the better life by achieving education attainment…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Democracy, as defined by Polybius, was a “regime based on effective rule by the people.” In Polybius’ Histories, democracy was not based on each citizen having the ‘right to do whatever they wish or propose’ but true democracy relied on “reverence to the gods, succour of parents, respect to elders, obedience to laws, are traditional and habitual, in such communities” as well as decisions being decided by the majority. It has been agreed upon by most ancient historians that Rome was not a democracy, however, its political elements did contain ‘democratic elements’ and the democratic nature of these elements has been a source of much debate between historians. Historians such as Fergus Millar have argued that Rome’s political character was more similar to Athenian democracy than it has been credited whereas others such as minimise the significance of the democratic elements of Rome’s political system. In order to determine how democratic Rome’s political system was, the role of the people as well who was elected and into what positions should be examined.…

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays