Preview

Analyze the Effects of Political Compromise in Reducing Sectional Tension in the Period 1820-1861.

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
630 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analyze the Effects of Political Compromise in Reducing Sectional Tension in the Period 1820-1861.
Douglas Okwu
12-1-2012
Period: 7th

Analyze the effects of political compromise in reducing sectional tension in the period 1820-1861.

During the period of 1820-1861 the north and south debated on issues that dealt with slavery and unbalance power, in order to reduce sectional tension between these two states, the Missouri Compromise, Compromise of 1850, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act were proposed.
The North and South both had opposite opinions about slavery, The South favored slavery because of there agricultural based economy which they needed slaves to attend to their harvests and crops, the North was against slavery because they were an industrialized nation they had no need for slavery. This debate went on and almost resulted to a civil war if not for the help of Henry Clay a Great Compromiser who announced a way to solve this issue using the Missouri Compromise, Kansas Nebraska Act, and the Compromise of 1850.
In 1820 the Missouri Compromise also known as the 36,30 was proposed by Henry Clay who intended that this compromise would help solve the issue that the North and South had about slavery which was that any state above the red line was considered a free state and any state below was a slave state, now this actually had a good affect because it reduced the tension for a while, but did not solve future problems that was going to occur between free and slave state.
In the Compromise of 1850 which was a compromise that was intended to solve issues that the Missouri Compromise couldn’t solve, This compromise made California a free state, It banned slave trade in Washington DC, It divided the land that Mexico acquired into two state and made the people decided on rather they wanted it to become a free or a slave state, It made Texas give up the land they acquired and also gave them 10 million dollars to pay their debt to Mexico, It announced that any runaway slaves that was not arrested or brought to the authority, that person would receive a fine of



Bibliography: - http://www.historyplace.com/lincoln/kansas.htm -http://www.historyking.com/American-History/timeline/1803- 1849/missouri-compromise/What-Did-The-Missouri-Compromise-Do.html[->0] - http://mrkash.com/activities/compromise.html - http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h83.html [->0] - http://www.historyking.com/American-History/timeline/1803-1849/missouri-compromise/What-Did-The-Missouri-Compromise-Do.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Compromise Of 1850 Dbq

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page

    The compromise of 1850 was a document constructed by Henry Clay to ease tensions between North and South. The compromise consisted of the following five points—(1) writing a new fugitive slave law, since beforehand white citizens could give runaway slaves room and board and not be penalized, therefore appeasing the South, (2) annexing California as a free state to the Union, an advantage to the North, (3) prohibiting the slave trade, but not slavery itself, in the District of Columbia, (4) reorganizing the Mexican Cession into the New Mexico and Utah territories with the slavery issue being decided by popular sovereignty, and (5) declaring a border between Texas and New Mexico, with $10 million in reparations for the territory Texas surrendered…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the beginning of westward expansion, the issue of slavery in the newly settles territory became an important and dividing political issue. The Missouri Compromise tried to reach an agreement between the North and South, admitting Maine as a free state, but Missouri as a slave state. Although the Missouri Compromise was unsuccessful in satisfying the North and South, it was important in that it marked the boundary for slavery in the territory…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compromise Of 1850 Dbq

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages

    t the time when the United States was a new nation, there were a number of issues that needed to be addressed in order for the Union of states to become a working country. In a short period, the North had become more progressive and industrialized. There were larger urban populations and the issues that faced northern areas were different from those that faced the South. When new territories were added to the nation, it was politically relevant that they were added in such a way that the balance of power was maintained. The Compromise of 1850 addressed this balance. The Compromise was a group of five laws that addressed slavery and overturned the Missouri Compromise. The climate of the time quickly becomes one of the northern states against…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri compromise included Missouri wanting to enter the union as a slave state. At that time there were eleven slave states and eleven free states. Missouri would have made the states uneven. A political action taken by the government to prevent this from happening was the Tallmadge amendment. This amendment included, "would ban importation of slaves and free the children of current slaves..." This amendment was however defeated in the senate.…

    • 502 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the early eighteenth century, Americans achieved reconciliation of political disputes through compromise. In 1819, Missouri admitted to become a slave state. This threatened to upset the balance of free and slave states. To contain peace, Congress passed the Missouri Compromise in 1820 which admitted Maine as a free state, Missouri as a slave state, and prohibited slavery north of the 36°30 latitude line. In 1832, a protectionist tariff was passed, lowering the preceding Tariff of 1828. The South disliked the “Tariff of Abominations” because they were obligated to pay an increased amount on products yet they had no industry. The Tariff of 1832 still did not appease the South. Under the influence of John Calhoun who…

    • 2127 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The intent of the Missouri Compromise was to solve the problem of unequal representation between slave and free states in the Union and, hopefully, bring peace between the North and South.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    APUSH question

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Evaluate the extent to which political compromise contributed to maintaining continuity as well as fostering change concerning sectional tntions in the period of 1820-1861.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri Compromise was a good plan in theory. It made one state a slave state and another state free. It alternated between the two to keep it even. The Missouri Compromise made Missouri a slave state, and made Maine a free state. Eventually, they split slave states and free states along the 36-30 parallel, which divided the states into North and South. The North became free states and the South became the slave states. The Missouri Compromise helped keep things neat and even but split the states.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri Compromise was an agreement made that allowed for Missouri to join the union as a slave state and Maine as a free state to ensure the equal representation. A line is drawn across the map which it excludes slavery from any point north of parallel 36:30 below that line, would be able to come in a slave state and above the line would become free states. This compromise was a solution that would postpone the civil…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri Compromise affected the start of the Civil War for different reasons. The major reason was that it divided where slavery was legal or not at a line, known as the 36o30’ line, 36th parallel, or the Mason Dixon line. When Missouri entered as a slave state, Maine entered as a free state. The 36th parallel separated the North from the South, making the North all free states, and the South all slave states. The North and South basically became their own separate countries, but ruled by the same government. Many people wanted to break away from their slave state, and move to a free state, which caused the outbreak of the Civil War.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Missouri Compromise, in many ways made political conditions worse between the North and South. For a long time the North and South had been fighting about political issues such as slavery. The North believed that it was wrong to capture, enslave and ship Africans to America to work in harsh conditions for free for White owners. The South, on the other hand believed slavery was right and should be used for helping the economy and producing cash crops so the North could use the supplies to make products. But the addition of new states, especially an uneven number made the tension grow between the two sides on the decision of slavery.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Began in 1787?

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Missouri Compromise passed in 1820 that passed a rule that prohibited slavery in states from the former Louisiana Purchase and Main. Leaving Missouri and west of it slave states. Which later on the Southern believed that slavery would be under attack and began to build arguments to protect it.…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Compromises

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the years leading up to the Civil War there were three major compromises that were passed and one compromise that was drafted but never voted on. The compromises covered are The Missouri Compromise, The Compromise of 1850, and Crittenden’s Compromise; which was never acted upon by congress. These three compromises tried, and failed to, deal with the increasing sectionalism between the north and the south over the issue of slavery from 1820 to 1861. At the time the compromises were written there were overlying reasons in which the compromises were necessary. The expansion of the country and introduction of new territories and states resulted in congressional conflicts between North and South that would attempt the balancing of pro and free-states…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pre Civil War Opposition

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Missouri Compromise was one of the political actions towards prohibiting slavery in new territory. It was a two-part political action by Henry Clay, he would first admit Missouri to the union as a free state, and was balanced by Maine’s admission. Secondly all new territories from the Louisiana Purchase of 1803 were excluded of slavery. (Thomas Jefferson Purchased Louisiana in 1803 from France to prosper economically, by doing this he rid the French of the ports of New Orleans, and freed the passage of the Mississippi).Without this compromise lower Missouri would have been admitted as a slave state, and slavery would have been permitted in the newly gained territories of Louisiana. These prohibitions aided in preventing the spread of slavery into new territories therefore limiting it and further preventing new support. Other political actions occurred that further opposed the development of slavery.…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Essay

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To add on, there were some laws that made the North and the South angry at each other. One of the more famous laws was included in the Compromise of 1850. That law was the Fugitive Slave Act and it stated that the northerners have to capture and return any slave that escapes to the North. One slave by the name of Dred Scott was famous for going to the North, only to be sent back to the south thus suing for his freedom. The Chief Justice at the time, Roger Taney, said that Scott couldn’t sue because Scott…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays