Preview

Analysis Of Milgram's Experiment And The Stanford Prison Experiment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
845 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analysis Of Milgram's Experiment And The Stanford Prison Experiment
Throughout the ages, people have always followed the orders of a person with a higher status: students have always listened to their teacher, Catholics have always listened to their priests, and soldiers have always listened to their commander. However this norm is not always acceptable, especially when the followers blindly obey the authority. Throughout this paper I will explore why people are so willing to accept orders particularly in dire situations and how this psychological phenomenon can be addressed in the modern day.
Although many of us would agree not to commit crimes, Milgram's experiment proves that humans are easily manipulated. At the beginning of the 1930’s, Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Party exploited the widespread discontent in Germany to attract popular and political support. Though the Germans were
…show more content…
A dozen were picked as prison guards and the other half as prisoners. In the experiment, the prison guards abused their power to show dominance over the prisoners. With such power, the guards physically abused and humiliated the prisoners to show dominance. Although the experiment was not directly linked to World War II, similar things happened during the war. To blame the German loss in World War I, the Nazi’s blamed the Slavs and Jews that “backstabbed” the Germans on the homefront. Building a nationwide hatred and taking over their little to no land, the Germans started to realize the power they had over the Jewish people. The death camps were a place where the German soldiers had unlimited power over the Jewish people. Like the Stanford Prison Experiment, the guards of these death camps would physically abuse and ultimately kill them. By the end of the war these soldiers who ran the death camps were treated as uncontrollable beasts during the trials, yet in reality they were just ordinary men who happened to have a lot of perceived power during the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Most people would agree with doing something horrific to another person, since it is easier to conform, than to fight, people tend to protect themselves before protecting a stranger. Stanley Milgram put a study together to prove that Germans are more likely to be obedient to authority then American are. The study was called “If Hitler Asked You to Electrocute a Stranger, Would You? Probably.” Milgram explains the character aspects of why people listen to authority and why they afraid not to. Social structure and the organization of society have a powerful affect on people. Milgrams set out to New Haven to start the study ad later on planed to go to Germany to do the study on the society there.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Every human has a unique and complex thought processing system in which it is nearly impossible to determine how each person will react in a given situation. At an early age, people are taught to be obedient and oftentimes are forced to make a decision between being obedient or following their own morals. Usually, obedience wins because of the emphasis society has placed on it. Most of human’s actions are a result of a previous action in which they felt necessary to do. Both authors, Stanley Milgram of “The Perils of Obedience” and Ian Parker of “Obedience” agree that, humans, as a whole, will not respond the same in every similar situation because their actions are usually a result of obedience or of their current situation, rather than their personality.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Can good, moral, and virtuous people be pushed to do bad things? This article seeks to compare an experiment done in 1971 to a real life military situation during wartime. The article also tries to link the experiment to another horrible act done by someone suffering from various mental illnesses with extremely mixed results. Is there a correlation between these three events as far as the mental states of the participants?…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The articles “The Stanford Prison Experiment” written by Philip G. Zimbardo and “The My Lai Massacre: A Military Crime of Obedience” composed by Herbert C. Kelman and V. Lee Hamilton both focus on the effects of power. In which the subjects have been ordered to follow something by superiors. In the experiment the original group of subjects are divided into the role of guards, and inmates. The massacre, however, was not an experiment but was the result of an order issued by a higher ranking official. In comparison the movie A Few Good Men was used. This movie contained the same main underlying concepts as the articles which makes it a good comparison. Involved were two marine who were charged with murder of a fellow marine and the conspiracy…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, in Milgram’s experiment, people complied due to the authority figure urging them to continue and appealing to their sense of responsibility. However, this has caused many of the participants to reflect in quiet horror that they were willing to harm another by executing up to 450 volts of electricity. It is a dreadful thing to realize that humans can be so easily manipulated to participate in heinous acts, causing us to take a second look on where we stand…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever noticed that certain people act and behave differently when they are with crowds versus when they are alone? Being in a large crowd can really impact individual to act in a certain way that they seem to fit in with the group and sometimes do things more anonymous as it is in a large crowd. Both Zimbardo and Le Bon believe that bystanders are less responsible and more likely to commit violence than when people are alone. Philip Zimbardo is a psychologist and a professor at Stanford University; he researches the cause of evil in people by doing a Stanford prison experiment. Zimbardo states about how evil can cause good people easily by the peers that they are surrounded by and the culture and traditional way changes can affect people…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jim Jones Research Paper

    • 3624 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Many theories and questions are raised from the problem of obedience to authority. What can make another person be obedient to another? Why do some people obey others when they know what they’re doing is wrong? This is a problem for the human population and it demands reasoning, explanation, and examination. We must reflect on what many experts have examined in the field, and draw some conclusions. There are many experts that have studied obedience to authority, and why people still obey even though it may be wrong. In the military following orders is the key to your survival. Even if your superior officers tell you to kill someone or shoot someone it may…

    • 3624 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A team at Stanford University, led by Phillip Zimbardo, conducted the Stanford Prison Experiment to investigate causes of conflict between military guards and prisoners. Zimbardo and his team were seeking to observe the inherent personality traits of prisoners and guards and see if this was the chief cause of abusive behavior in these settings (Haney, Banks, and Zimbardo, 1973). This study is one that is well know and well-recognized. Zimbardo and his study are often discussed in many psychology courses today, and have even caused reform in prison systems as well as IRB/APA ethical committees.…

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Milgram Aims and Context

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Milgram’s study was done after the trial of Adolf Eichmann. This was after the holocaust where 6 million Jews were murdered. This trial displayed an example of destructive obedience where people were said to have complied with what they were told to do, even if it had a negative impact on others, which in this case was murdering innocent people, although being completely mentally aware of what they were being asked to do and yet still carried out the task.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this chapter on the research of obedience, studying the psychological actions and reactions, the implications brought forth are the surprising effects of simple commands and the subliminal influence. The articles “The Perils of Obedience”, by Stanley Milgram, and “Opinions and Social Pressure”, by Solomon E. Asch, both exhibit the traits of simple, ordinary test subjects following orders and actions by someone who is illustrated to have power or the general consensus but realistically do not.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The students involved in the Zimbardo Prison Experiment were not cruel people, nor were they truly sadistic. When given the roles as prison guards and prisoners, their behaviors changed dramatically. As prison guards, normally friendly students acted as prison guards under the warden. Under the authority of the guards, the students with the roles of prisoners acted unnaturally and did as the guards told them. Similarly, the soldiers in Germany under Hitler's command did as they were told and acted as they did, not because they were bad people, but because of their positions in German society. They were soldiers and did as a German soldier under Hitler would do. Neither prison guard nor soldier acted aggressively because of their own personalities,…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why Did Genocide Happen

    • 1373 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Following the conclusion of World War II in Nazi Germany, the world witnessed the Nuremburg War Criminal Trials, a set of trials against the onlookers of the Holocaust, or Germany’s mass extermination of European Jews. In most of the cases in the trials, the accused often used obedience to plead their cases, claiming that their actions had all come from higher in the Nazi’s hierarchy of government. Researcher Stanley Milgram “devised [an] experiment to answer the question ‘Could it be that Eichmann and his million accomplices in the Holocaust were just following orders? Could we call them accomplices?’ … The study revealed that two-thirds of the time, the participant was willing to deliver potentially life-threatening shocks to the ‘learner’ simply because they were receiving orders from an authority figure” (Document A and Documentary). Historians baffled the thought that Americans were not capable of killing their own peers, simply because the population was thought of as “superior” and it was claimed to be “impossible for an American to kill a fellow American.” However, Milgram’s experiments confirmed the truth that humans are willing to commit unethical or inhumane acts against other humans if given orders from an authority figure, confirming his suspicions during the Nuremberg Trials, and more specifically, Adolf Eichmann’s claim that he was only following…

    • 1373 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Obedience to authority is an aspect present in all societies throughout known history. For the entirety of this paper, obedience to authority will refer to any act a member of society performs that he or she was told to do by a position of higher authority. This paper will focus on the idea that members of society will follow commands that may go against their moral beliefs on the sole account that the commands come from a place of higher authority. This statement has been tested multiple times beginning with Stanley Milgram’s experiment in 1963, in which he set up a scenario that convinced people they were harming an individual they had met only minutes before through electrical…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The line between good and evil is permeable and almost anyone can be induced to cross it when pressured by situational forces.” Said Philip Zimbardo. The Stanford Prison Experiment helped solve many mysteries about forensic psychology and how good, normal people, can turn evil. The Stanford Prison Experiment was a psychologically intense experiment that affected the lives of normal, mentally healthy, students who were brought into interference with situational forces.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fake prisoners and fake guards in a spurious jail is a peculiar way to determine roles in society. Philip G. Zimbardo was the mastermind of the Stanford Prison Experiment, which was a psychological experiment that determined the roles of members in a society that became a fiasco (“Philip G. Zimbardo” 1). The experiment left emotional and mental scars on mock-prisoner lives. The Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE) illustrates the way a person changes when a label and power is all of a sudden given to hoax guards in order to control fraud prisoners.…

    • 1435 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays