Preview

Stanford Prison Experiment Analysis

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1333 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Stanford Prison Experiment Analysis
The articles “The Stanford Prison Experiment” written by Philip G. Zimbardo and “The My Lai Massacre: A Military Crime of Obedience” composed by Herbert C. Kelman and V. Lee Hamilton both focus on the effects of power. In which the subjects have been ordered to follow something by superiors. In the experiment the original group of subjects are divided into the role of guards, and inmates. The massacre, however, was not an experiment but was the result of an order issued by a higher ranking official. In comparison the movie A Few Good Men was used. This movie contained the same main underlying concepts as the articles which makes it a good comparison. Involved were two marine who were charged with murder of a fellow marine and the conspiracy …show more content…
Kelman and V. Lee Hamilton wrote about the tragic massacre of Vietnamese civilians by American soldiers. The My Lai Massacre allegedly occurred on March 16, 1968, however, due to military conspiracy and cover ups the issue remained hidden for a full year. Brought to court on charges in 1969 and 1970. Even though 14 of the high ranking officials had charges against them only one was convicted, which issued alarm and questions. The massacre was documented by soldiers and reports The army commanders assumed all the innocent civilians would be at the market and those remaining would be Vietcong related individuals. Orders were given to Charlie Company that summarized told to destroy the village and all in it. The My Lai Massacre was what is described as a sanctioned massacre “acts of indiscriminate, ruthless, often systematic mass violence, carried out by paramilitary personnel while engaged in officially sanctioned campaigns” (Kelman and Hamilton 137). Sanctioned massacres often described by the authors, are massacres ordered by a higher person that are deemed acceptable due to their authority. The article ends with the authors concluding that massacres are due to political forms dehumanizing civilians as just bodies to be …show more content…
This was a real life event where people with little power were forced by mental dependence to submit to a higher order. Army commanders told Charlie Company that the village would be cleared of innocents, the only remaining people would be people with Vietcong relations. The village was ordered to be completely destroyed and any inside killed. This order, issued by those in a higher chain of command was expected to be carried out. The soldiers were expected to submit, and they did. The impact of this order was catastrophic and demonstrated the real implications this issue has had on

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    My Lai Massacre Dbq

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On March 16, 1968 the massacre of My Lai took place when 75 troops marched into the village of My Lai and killed over 500 civilians. This unfortunate blemish on America is still being debated today, unsure of where to place the blame. Do they place it with Lt. William Calley for giving the command to his troops, or to Lt. Calley’s commanding officers who from which Calley was just acting out orders, or to the American people for there continued protest of the war.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unfortunate event occurred at Pink Vile when the Charlie Company was there. The Geneva Convention was clearly violated when captain Medina and Lt. Calley were giving orders to shoot innocent civilians. There was a year cover up of the My Lai Massacre in the time military forces were looking for excuses to justify their actions. Why was Lt. Calley the only one held accountable and was his punishment fair? Who should have been held accountable for the events that have happened at My Lai?…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The My Lai Massacre occurred on March 16, 1968 IN the village called My Lai, which is located in South Vietnam. The Vietnam war was fought between The North and The South Vietnam about Communism. This was feared by many about the world, especially in America. Anti-communist countries backed out South Vietnam the best of their availability. The communist countries, however, supported North Vietnam at their best availability. America was fighting for eleven years, while the Vietnam was lasting much longer than that.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    My Lai Massacre Essay

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages

    On March 16, 1968, members of Company C, also known as Charlie Company, of the 1st Battalion, 20th Infantry Regiment, 11th Brigade of the 23rd (Americal) Infantry Division working under the command of Captain Medina and Lieutenant Calley entered the South Vietnamese village of My Lai and systematically murdered between 347 and 504 innocent non-combatant civilians. A series of investigations in the year following the incident led to the arrest of one officer who was released after only serving three and one half years under house arrest. How did it happen that a massacre of such a great scale ended with little to no repercussions for those involved? Who was really to blame for the massacre: the men on the ground or the higher ups? I believe…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Before invading My Lai, many soldiers report that they were ordered to kill all of the people in the village without hesitation. They testify being told that the village of My Lai was inhabited solely by the Viet Cong and that no regular civilians were living there or had ever lived there. They were additionally told to treat it as a free fire zone where they could kill anyone that they wanted to kill (Raimondo “Four Hours in My Lai”). These soldiers ended up destroying the village and executing many innocent villagers without realizing that they were not members of the Viet Cong. Other soldiers claim that their commanding officers had told them that the residents of My Lai had already been told evacuated and that only the Viet Cong would be left: “The company commanders were told that most of the population of My Lai were ‘Viet Cong’ or ‘Viet Cong sympathizers’ and were advised that most of the civilian inhabitants would be away from My Lai” (Goldstein, Marshall, and Schwartz 44). The villagers were then killed indiscriminately because it looked as though all of the innocent residents no longer lived there.…

    • 1970 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pinkville Massacre Essay

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Often dubbed as the Pinkville Massacre, the My Lai massacre is notoriously known as one of the most brutal incidents during the Vietnamese War, even being considered a genocide by some. It is considered to be “the most shocking episode of the Vietnamese War” (Espiritu 17). The massacre consisted of the killing of up to 500 unarmed men, women and children. While a part of Task Force Barker, Company Charlie had been ordered to destroy the remainders of a Vietcong Battalion, situated in the Son My village area. Colonel Oran K. Henderson had ordered them to be aggressive with the enemy, suspecting that the village was a supply area for the Vietcong. Captain Medina had given his men erroneous intelligence, stating that all civilians would leave…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Can good, moral, and virtuous people be pushed to do bad things? This article seeks to compare an experiment done in 1971 to a real life military situation during wartime. The article also tries to link the experiment to another horrible act done by someone suffering from various mental illnesses with extremely mixed results. Is there a correlation between these three events as far as the mental states of the participants?…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever noticed that certain people act and behave differently when they are with crowds versus when they are alone? Being in a large crowd can really impact individual to act in a certain way that they seem to fit in with the group and sometimes do things more anonymous as it is in a large crowd. Both Zimbardo and Le Bon believe that bystanders are less responsible and more likely to commit violence than when people are alone. Philip Zimbardo is a psychologist and a professor at Stanford University; he researches the cause of evil in people by doing a Stanford prison experiment. Zimbardo states about how evil can cause good people easily by the peers that they are surrounded by and the culture and traditional way changes can affect people…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    VN War: The moral issues it raised as soldiers were brutalised and desensitised after the killing.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In August of 1971, a group of researchers, headed by Dr. Philip Zimbardo, at Stanford University, set out to learn just how prison affects a person psychologically. The results of this experiment were shocking, to say the least, and led that team of researchers, and many others, to question just how bad the prison systems of America really are. The results of this experiment were far more devastating and shocking than anyone involved had imagined.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kent State

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the late 1960s and early 1970s, student protests against the Vietnam War were fairly common, and often violent. The May 4, 1970 protest at Kent State— just one of hundreds of campus protests scheduled for that day in reaction to President Nixon’s announced military push into Cambodia—was considered relatively peaceful by historical standards. Many questions arose after the National Guard opened fire on a crowd of protesting students— the most haunting of them being: “Why did they shoot at unarmed student protesters?” And while the National Guard steadfastly claims the shooting was justified, victims are equally adamant that there was no justification present—and the known facts can support both claims.…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    J O N AT H A N, V I N E E T H , J A K E , R O H I T…

    • 359 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stanford Prison Study

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This experiment was designed to depict how various situations can affect the behaviour and mindset of an individual. Within an extremely short timeframe it was evident that the mindset of the “prisoners” in this experiment was entirely altered to the point where they truly felt as though they were in jail. This experiment also indirectly indicated how power corrupts, as the “guards” also experienced an altered mindset.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    dak son massacre

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    So, we fast forward eight years into the war, long after both sides are seen to be nothing short of ruthless as well as practically nothing less than fearless. They seemed to be pretty evenly matched throughout quite possibly the longest, most grueling war Vietnam has ever gone through. Since the Viet Cong’s headquarters were based in the south, it gave them much more accuracy and success when planning any sort of attack because they see everything their opposition tries to hide. Eventually, the war ended up as a compilation of many, many massacres; Dak Son village being one of the of the few that had survivors give testimonies to the horrors they had to endure solely because they disagreed with communism and the possibility of this village helping some refugees of the Viet Cong escape leading them to reply with an outlandish act of complete and utter vengeance.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “It was like running a race without knowing its length” (178). The soldiers in the lowest level of the military hierarchy dealt with the most anxieties for they never had clarity on what the objective or larger picture of their missions were. Because “even when American unites outkilled the enemy or drive him back into the jungle, there was no clear sense of triumph or completion” (187). The war then turned to a fight for survival. Each soldier simply wanted to stay alive to return home. “Some soldiers began to believe the only way to survive in Vietnam was simply to treat all Vietnamese as outright enemies and make no pretense of favoring some over others.” (215). The change in psychological view on the war can be attributed to the lack of seen progress during the war, since progress was never physically…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays