Preview

Analysis Of Life In Schools

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1065 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analysis Of Life In Schools
From page 132 to 182 of the book Life in Schools, McLaren’s postmodern left commitments and his reaction to advances in British educational Marxism are emphasized in this section. That is class analysis, fronting Marxism, and bringing politics back into the heart and soul of the education system, the author has positioned himself at the vanguard of remaking critical pedagogy as a reckoning force for social change. The ensuing fusion has triggered a storm of controversy in the midst of the educational Left. Further than this, however, he has been the inspiration of critical pedagogy in social spheres outside the academia and university, as well as the mass workers movement.
With respect to Marx’s theory of alienation, he has supported emancipatory
…show more content…
Adopting Marx’s humanized materialism as the beginning point for a “philosophy of praxis.” His fuses theory with history and biography at the juncture of where teachers/ students conduct themselves instinctively within schools to provide both an imagined and real pedagogy of hope and a revolutionary critical pedagogy. McLaren attains this by giving his audience equally the explanatory notions (ideology, exploitation and class) and experiential tools to concurrently comprehend and intercede in emerging worldwide structures that are progressively regulating and organizing daily practices of schooling. By positioning this critique which is the center of his revolutionary critical pedagogy, not in the space of the self nevertheless in the place of the social systems, he sets the ideology of capitalist knowledge sector perpetually on the defensive. As per McLaren, this will need learners, as historical and social agents, to achieve control over their physical labor and intellectual and (p. 180), which comprises of pinpointing ways to take theory away from the academics and integrate it in educational practice p. 189). This is fundamentally essential to a revolutionary critical pedagogy, which is devoid of liberal philosophies of “empowerment” but reasonably shared action and “power” focused …show more content…
26). The perspectives are limited. Since McLaren’s teaching experience with economically unfortunate students, highlights the charming or pitiful characters, the moments of despair and hope, the inexplicable or entertaining antics, and the fierce incidents related to both pupils and teachers. McLaren entries are a part of the school experience. But daily life in school classrooms is beyond a succession of heartless events. There is also an aspect of living together for almost five or six hours daily, monthly and yearly. Once in a blue moon did these McLaren’s episodes provide discernment into pedagogic relationships with neither the average children, nor the teacher’s part in the school classroom as he meditated over the issues and the organization of time and space in connection to the needs of his learners. Additionally the stories were written from the journalist perspective as opposed to a teacher’s perspective. The incidents in the book are becoming repetitious since new aspects of classroom life were neither established nor was larger perception into schooling given a person reads page 132-182 pages. This section ends with a resilient summary of the failures of the dogma of education equality and the necessity for teachers to be dedicated

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the chapter two of “Pedagogy of the Oppressed”, written by Paulo Freire, it talks about the two education styles, “banking concept of education,” and “problem-posing education”. “Banking education” is “narrative education”, which means teacher teach and students taught. According to Freire, the contradiction between teachers and students is the core topic the chapter two. For example, “The teacher presents himself to his students as their necessary oppsite; by considering their ignorance absolute, he justifies his own existence” (72). Additionally, Freire crtisizes the traditional narrative education. He claims that the narrative education will stifle the creativity of students (71). After…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Marxists helped contribute to our understanding of the role of education in society in many ways. They went against the functionalists and even opposed one of the functionalist’s theories.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    My experience in the education system was not anything like ‘The “Banking” Concept of Education’ critiques it. It specifies on critiquing the teacher-student relationship and I would like to argue a few points made in this reading. Such as, how the teacher presents himself or herself, the relationship involving the teacher and student, and how students never discover that they also educate the teacher. I could argue these points through experiences I’ve had over my years as a student throughout the education system, I will focus on high school.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay I will show that there are different views on education and that we see them in the different teachers. You can see that Hector is the more outgoing teacher. Mrs Lintott is the stereotypical teacher and Irwin is the new teacher with new views on education. I will go in-depth into the teacher's point of view. I will start with the one of the main teachers and that is Hector.…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some would argue that the education system mainly exists to select and prepare students for their future work roles and careers. Marxists believe that the education system’s role is the ideological apparatus of the state; it spreads ruling-class ideology and favours the middle class. Marxists such as Althusser, Bowels & Gintus and Bourdieu disagree with this statement as they argue working class children get a second class education compared to middle class and are given an unrealistic expectation for the future.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    the Functionalist view that industrial capitalist societies are meritocracies and that every ones’ position in society is based on talent and hard work. Bowles and Gintis suggest ideas for why this is the case. They bases their theory around the idea of education being an ideological state apparatus. Bowles and Gintis’ theory is based on the ‘long shadow of work’ and the legitimating of inequality.
When speaking of the ‘long shadow of work’, Bowles and Gintis are referring to the strong relationship between social relationships at school and at work – they believe this helps education to play its major role in reproducing a labour force with hardworking, disciplined workers. Educations do this through the hidden curriculum and the correspondence theory. The hidden curriculum relates to many features of the workplace. An example of this would be that in school the hidden curriculum teaches students to abide by rules and accept punishment, this corresponds to the workplace where students would conform to rules and not argue with your boss. People believe that society and the education system is meritocratic. Bowles and Gintis believe this to be false, as in reality it is legitimating the inequalities that exist in society.
Althusser sees education as an ideological state apparatus. This is where the government issues ruling class ideas through different institutions, or apparatus, in this case education is the main apparatus. This is needed by capitalism to transmit the idea that the inequalities in society are justified as society is meritocratic. This helps capitalism by preparing students for their future jobs. The working class are taught to accept their future exploitation in the workplace. Where as the middle class are prepared for management roles supported by their qualifications.
However, these views from the Marxists are merely ideas and theories, as…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxism is a conflict view that sees society as being based on class divisions and exploitation. Marxists argue that in society there are two classes – the bourgeoisie which is the ruling class and the proletariat which is the working class. The capitalist class owns the means of production and make their profit by exploiting the labour of the working class. This creates class conflict that could threaten the stability of capitalism or even result in a revolution to overthrow it. Social institutions such as the education system reproduce class inequalities and play an ideological role by persuading exploited workers that inequality is justified and acceptable.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marxists believe that education serves the needs of the economic base of the society, along with other ideals such as religion, family, mass media and politics. Without education and the other ideals as the superstructure, the society will collapse when only the means and relations of production existing as the economic base. Also, in Marxists’ point of view, education only serves two purposes: to reproduce inequalities and social relations of productions and to justify these inequalities through meritocracy. However, Althusser, the neo-Marxist in 1971, points out that education is an Idealogical State Apparatus (ISA), just like media, family and other ideals as well. The main function of education is to pass on the common values in order to maintain and reproduce class discrimination in wealth and authority, generation after generation. This then continues to produce capitalism without the need to enforce it into the society, in the same way ideology is spread subconsciously. Althusser argues that a hidden curriculum exists to achieve this result; the way schools are organized and how knowledge is taught encourages the working class to abide by the rules of the capitalist society and accept the discrimination and failure without any sign of protest. In 1977, Bourdieu called the act of accepting failure and higher class authority “Symbolic Violence”.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pedagogy of the Oppressed

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pedagogy of the Oppressed examines the struggle for equality and liberty within the educational system and proposes a new pedagogy. One of Paulo Freire’s fundamental arguments in Pedagogy of the Oppressed is that education is political. Freire describes a sharp difference between the two forms of education, both of which are explicit and intentional, education for “liberation” and education for “domestication”. Freire argues that oppression is not incidental to society but is integrated. Freire states, “The solution is not to integrate them into the structure of oppression but to transform that structure so that they can become beings for themselves” (48).…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Public education, it can be argued, shapes society, instils social mores and indoctrinates the impressionable with those philosophies the elites value. This essay will focus upon three main areas intrinsic to the education system. These are the social reproduction of ideas, the life chances created and instilled through education, and the socialisation of the individuals undergoing the educational process. Two main sociological perspectives that are useful when studying the education system are Functionalism and Critical Theory, because they focus on macro issues and social structures more than the interactionist perspective.…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The role of education in society can basically be divided into two main ideologies. The first and perhaps the oldest ideology or theory is termed the “Reproductive Theory”, this has long been promoted by the “establishment” as a way of ensuring that everyone knows their place in society and the “Status Quo” is perpetuated. Bowles and Gintis (1976) proposed a more up to date version, known as the “Correspondence theory”, this advocates that there is a “relationship between the nature of work and the education system in any Capitalist society.” Basically the theory says that the major task of any Capitalist education system is to train people so that they fulfil the needs of the production process. In this respect, Bowles and Gintis (1976) “show how various aspects of economic production (work) have corresponding features in the education system. In basic terms, the organisation of the education system explicitly mirrors the way work is organised in Capitalist societies.”…

    • 2076 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxism and Education

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Marxist perspective of education in society can be very questionable because Marxist theorists such as; Louis Althusser, Bowles and Gintis, David Reynolds and Willis all seem to disagree with one another.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Schoolteachers provide students with education and preparation for adulthood. However, what it means to be a teacher in the 21st century is rife with ambiguity. An analysis of educational artefacts will aid in answering this question. One is a system-level document titled Closing the Gap (Appendix A), while the other is a school-level document outlining the homework guidelines at Siena Catholic College (Appendix B). Discussion on these documents will relate to one of four educational discourses and the effects of policies on students, teachers and the schooling milieu. The four educational discourses include academic rationalism, social and economic efficiency, child centred learning,…

    • 2149 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As mentioned in Item A, Marxists take a critical view of the role of education. They see society as based on class divisions and capitalist exploitations. The capitalist society is a two class system as mentioned in Item A and it consists of a ruling class, the bourgeoisie and the working class, the proletariat. The bourgeoisie exploits the proletariat according to Marxists and they believe that the education system only serves the needs and interests of the ruling class, as mentioned in Item A. Marxists also education as functioning to prevent revolution and maintain capitalism.…

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PGCE Module 1 Assignment

    • 3987 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Freire, P.(1999), Pedagogy of the Oppressed, In: Pollard, A. (Ed.) Readings for Reflective Teaching, Challenging the ‘Banking’ Concept of Education, 2002, p.365. London: Continuum International Publishing…

    • 3987 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays