Preview

Assess the Argument That the Main Function of Education Is to Reproduce the Social Class Structure.

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
935 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Assess the Argument That the Main Function of Education Is to Reproduce the Social Class Structure.
The social class structure in the society is reproduced in many ways. One of the ways is through education. Many believes that the main function of education is not to educate the younger generation, instead is to replicate the social class structure one generation after the other. Certainly, many contrasting opinions have been expressed by different sociologists and explanations are made to justify their point of view.

Marxists believe that education serves the needs of the economic base of the society, along with other ideals such as religion, family, mass media and politics. Without education and the other ideals as the superstructure, the society will collapse when only the means and relations of production existing as the economic base. Also, in Marxists’ point of view, education only serves two purposes: to reproduce inequalities and social relations of productions and to justify these inequalities through meritocracy. However, Althusser, the neo-Marxist in 1971, points out that education is an Idealogical State Apparatus (ISA), just like media, family and other ideals as well. The main function of education is to pass on the common values in order to maintain and reproduce class discrimination in wealth and authority, generation after generation. This then continues to produce capitalism without the need to enforce it into the society, in the same way ideology is spread subconsciously. Althusser argues that a hidden curriculum exists to achieve this result; the way schools are organized and how knowledge is taught encourages the working class to abide by the rules of the capitalist society and accept the discrimination and failure without any sign of protest. In 1977, Bourdieu called the act of accepting failure and higher class authority “Symbolic Violence”.

Education acts as a reproduction tool for the capitalist relations of production, Bowles and Gintis (1976) argues. The capitalist relations of production is the hierarchy structure of workers

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Marxists take a critical view of the role of education. Capitalist society is essentially a two-class system, with a ruling class exploiting the working class. Marxist see education as being run in the interests if the ruling class. For example, Althusser argues that education is an important ideological state apparatus that helps to control people’s ideas and beliefs. He suggests education has to purposes. It reproduces class inequalities through the generations by ensuring that most working-class pupils experience education failure. Education also legitimates this inequality, persuading the working class to accept educational and social inequalities. Other Marxists have also pointed to the existence of a hidden curriculum in schools.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx’ theory of the relations of production can be used as an important platform in locating the origins of class and gender inequity to the early stages of capitalism. In his theory ‘the relations of production’ he explained that private ownership of…

    • 1881 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Reproduction of Social Class- Students are taught to value capitalism and the state but this is not in their best interest, in fact it predestines to reproduce race and class inequalities. Myth of Meritocracy- Rewards for good behavior Structural Inequalities- “Schooling in Capitalist America- Schooling in Capitalist America by Bowles and Gintis: corresponding relations between school and work Schooling reproduces work relations Different tiers of the education system mirror different tiers of workplace. Inequalities also.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    New Right theorists agree with Functionalists that industrial societies should ideally be organised as capitalist societies and that education systems should operate to meet the needs of capitalism but these New Right theorists also argued in the 1970s and 1980s that in practice state education systems were organised inefficiently and that both their formal and hidden curricula were not geared to meeting the needs of industry. New Right theorists argued therefore in favour of education policies which would enable effective schools to expand at the expense of ineffective schools as a means of improving overall standards, in favour of increased emphasis within the formal curriculum on the transmission of knowledge and skills specifically relevant to the needs of industry and commerce, and against " liberal progressive" social ideas and teaching methods. According to New Right theorists these reforms would enable formal education systems to fulfil their economic functions more effectively.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Using material from item A and elsewhere, asses the view that the education system exists mainly to select and prepare young people for their future work roles…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Social Class is a fundamental aspect in society and can be found in all societies around the world. Aspects such as education, health, wealth, where you live, what do you do with yourself all contribute to where you as a member of society fit in. If you are a student attending a private school, living in Toorak with very wealthy parents you would be considered part of the ‘upper class’ in society, where people would generally look more highly of…

    • 81 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Industrial workers who wanted better lives for their children saw education as way to improve the future. In Industrial America, education served as a platform for social mobility, which was a motivation for its spread. Ultimately, thoughts surrounding education’s role in society evolved due to changing circumstances throughout the…

    • 1903 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paulo Freire, a Brazilian education and philosophy, describe in his book “The pedagogy of the oppressed”(2000) the education systems’ sole purpose is to keep a system of power beneficial only to the oppressor. He explains, “ the capability of banking education to minimize or annul the students creative power and to stimulate their credulity serves the interests of the oppressor, who cares neither to have the world revealed, nor to see it transformed”.In other words, did education system is used to the suppress originality and to maintain norms which limit and individual and subjected to a title or role. Furthermore, this system is used in order to transform students into workers/receptors that are ready at commands to perform the given task. In addition, Luis Rodriguez indicates that the educational system initiates the ideas of capitalism in his book “Always Running” (1993). He does so by describing how the structure of the school is composed between two separate groups, “The school separated these two groups by levels of education: The professional-class kids were provided with college-preparatory classes; the blue-collar students were pushed into ‘industrial arts’”. In other words, the education system contributes to the idea of…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxists Bowles and Gintis (1976) suggested that there is a correspondence between educational institutions and the workplace- the working class will stay working class, and characteristics such as self-image, social class identification, demeanour and presentation, will be paralleled within the workplace. Bowles and Gintis also maintained that whilst in school, the teachers were formed in a hierarchical system in which older students seem to be of a higher status than those who are younger; in the workplace, not all workers will be on the same salary in the same department. The overall belief is that the whole system has made it so that the ‘hidden curriculum’ enforces social order, and it marginalises worker, making them struggle for power, and this will create a subservient pool of workers. Durkheim, would disagree along with Davis and Moore, and Parsons, who collectively state that a skilled workforce is a product, and occupational allocation can be a defining outcome of vocational education. This really drives the core values of functionalism, as it seeks to work for the benefit of a consensus society, just trying to get the people back into work and off of welfare.…

    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This essay will firstly explain how sociologists identify class as a primary source of identity, secondly explain how sociologists also identify this source of identity as a primary pattern of inequality, thirdly it will refer to key sociological studies on institutional inequality and provide statistical data to illustrate how such inequalities are sustained and finally, refer to appropriate theoretical perspectives such as, Marx and Weber when explaining the causes of this primary patterns of inequality. Sociologists identify class as a primary source of identity as each class identity relates to large numbers of people with similar characteristics such as education, wealth, employment, cultural and political views, and background. They are assessed on these characteristics and then placed into one of the four classes, these are known as ‘The Upper Class’, ‘The Middle Class’, ‘The Working Class’, and ‘The Under…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    the Functionalist view that industrial capitalist societies are meritocracies and that every ones’ position in society is based on talent and hard work. Bowles and Gintis suggest ideas for why this is the case. They bases their theory around the idea of education being an ideological state apparatus. Bowles and Gintis’ theory is based on the ‘long shadow of work’ and the legitimating of inequality.
When speaking of the ‘long shadow of work’, Bowles and Gintis are referring to the strong relationship between social relationships at school and at work – they believe this helps education to play its major role in reproducing a labour force with hardworking, disciplined workers. Educations do this through the hidden curriculum and the correspondence theory. The hidden curriculum relates to many features of the workplace. An example of this would be that in school the hidden curriculum teaches students to abide by rules and accept punishment, this corresponds to the workplace where students would conform to rules and not argue with your boss. People believe that society and the education system is meritocratic. Bowles and Gintis believe this to be false, as in reality it is legitimating the inequalities that exist in society.
Althusser sees education as an ideological state apparatus. This is where the government issues ruling class ideas through different institutions, or apparatus, in this case education is the main apparatus. This is needed by capitalism to transmit the idea that the inequalities in society are justified as society is meritocratic. This helps capitalism by preparing students for their future jobs. The working class are taught to accept their future exploitation in the workplace. Where as the middle class are prepared for management roles supported by their qualifications.
However, these views from the Marxists are merely ideas and theories, as…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sociology Final Exam

    • 2046 Words
    • 9 Pages

    1.)Social class is a “class society, a set of concepts in the social sciences and political theory centered on models of social stratification in which people are grouped into a set of hierarchical social categories”( Grant,2001,p.161). The most common being the upper, middle, and lower classes. The upper class consist of people or families that represent institutional leadership, heads of multinational corporations, foundations, and universities. They are people who have finical stability and are well educated due to their finical income. Most commonly in American society today people fall in the middle class category. Middle class is made of people and families that are involved in clerical work, provide professional support, and engage in data collection. Even though they are educated based on local school systems they are not given the luxury education that you would fine with upper class. Last but not least you have the lower class. The lower class is commonly the hardworking of them all. They work full-time at wages below poverty line and commonly are on some type of social services help such as Medicaid or food stamp program (EBT).Even though they are entitled to education they commonly would rather work to just get by day to day due to finical struggles. Based on these classes’ people in today’s society have certain criteria that are used to determine ones place within the social class scale. Three most common criteria used to measure social class is wealth (property), power and prestige.…

    • 2046 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Inequality In Australia

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Class is a significant force in all societies, understanding class is crucial if we are to see how groups of people within our society have different experiences. Social stratification refers to the way society is organised within hierarchical layers (Furze,…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cited: Anyon, Jean. “From Social Class and the Hidden Curriculum of Work.” Social Class and the Hidden Curriculum of Work (Journal of Education, 1980)…

    • 2556 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the Webster dictionary, social class is defined as a group of people who share economic and social status. Social class is separated by one’s wealth and how they present themselves. James W. Loewen once said that “social class is probably the most important variable in society. From womb to tomb, it correlates with all other social characteristics of people.” Here he is stating that social class is something a person will have to deal with for from birth to death; it will develop a person and their unique characteristics (compound sentence). Social standings are ubiquitous, which makes the idea of this quote so intriguing. As the world becomes more complex, the division between social classes becomes more apparent…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays