Analysis Of Kensium Soft
4. DATA ANALYSIS & INTERPRETATIONS
4.1. Objective-1(A) determinants of EQ-Kensium Soft: -
4.1.1. Finding the correlation for employees in attention, clarity and Repair factors of EQ: -
TABLE 4.1.1. Correlation of Attention factor in Kensium soft: -
Item Correlation
Item-1 0.2645396
Item-3 0.429901
Item-5 -0.030265
Item-7 0.3318278
Item-9 0.2327557
Item-11 0.4495084
Item-13 0.2866891
Item-15 0.1304
Item-17 0.1576763
Item-19 0.5485856
Item-21 0.2996818
Item-23 0.0978369
Item-25 0.4787094
Item-27 0.1093522
Item-29 0.209593
Item-31 0.5326048
Item-33 0.1715623
Item-35 0.035291
Item-37 0.2037377
Item-39 0.2659596
Item-41 0.0976446
Item-43 0.2115186
Fig No: 4.1.1. Correlation for odd half
INTERPRETATION: The Fig shows that the respondent EQ …show more content…
Correlation for Odd half
INTERPRETATION: The Fig shows that the respondent EQ level on the Mayer –Salovey –Caruso test the respondent EQ is calculated by using the spearmen brown split half correlation method. Most of the respondent has Positive correlation in Odd half total in Attention factor.
Note: - I can mention one sample calculation of EQ of selected companies and remaining as usual same as above example.
4.3 Objective-2 (A) The Relation between EQ & STRESS of employees in Kensium soft:
TABLE 4.3.1 Correlation for Pre-test and post test
Item correlation item1 0.2734477 item2 -0.249644 item3 0.0429187 item4 0.1046618 item5 0.0967356 item6 0.1132643 item7 -0.064634 item8 -0.09343 item9 -0.117878 item10 0.0293326 item11 -0.096918 item12 -0.014332 item13 0.0298807 item14 0.1679236 item15 -0.300128 item16 0.3293231 item17 -0.03441
item18 …show more content…
The individual’s relation between EQ & Stress is calculated by conducting a pre-test and post –test and the correlations is calculated. This reveals that there is about 50% of the employees are high in balancing the EQ and Stress where as 50% are low.
TABLE: 4.3.2 T-Test
Item T-test item1 0.2062306 item2 0.7116123 item3 0.3186668 item4 0.794059 item5 0.9094672 item6 0.7055776 item7 0.3141547 item8 0.7772549 item9 0.5450636 item10 0.961176 item11 0.8569299 item12 0.8430365 item13 0.3746384 item14 0.5209 item15 0.2731336 item16 1 item17 0.8011795 item18 0.3734119 item19 0.9557773 item20 0.5817432 item21 0.8535167
item22
4.1. Objective-1(A) determinants of EQ-Kensium Soft: -
4.1.1. Finding the correlation for employees in attention, clarity and Repair factors of EQ: -
TABLE 4.1.1. Correlation of Attention factor in Kensium soft: -
Item Correlation
Item-1 0.2645396
Item-3 0.429901
Item-5 -0.030265
Item-7 0.3318278
Item-9 0.2327557
Item-11 0.4495084
Item-13 0.2866891
Item-15 0.1304
Item-17 0.1576763
Item-19 0.5485856
Item-21 0.2996818
Item-23 0.0978369
Item-25 0.4787094
Item-27 0.1093522
Item-29 0.209593
Item-31 0.5326048
Item-33 0.1715623
Item-35 0.035291
Item-37 0.2037377
Item-39 0.2659596
Item-41 0.0976446
Item-43 0.2115186
Fig No: 4.1.1. Correlation for odd half
INTERPRETATION: The Fig shows that the respondent EQ …show more content…
Correlation for Odd half
INTERPRETATION: The Fig shows that the respondent EQ level on the Mayer –Salovey –Caruso test the respondent EQ is calculated by using the spearmen brown split half correlation method. Most of the respondent has Positive correlation in Odd half total in Attention factor.
Note: - I can mention one sample calculation of EQ of selected companies and remaining as usual same as above example.
4.3 Objective-2 (A) The Relation between EQ & STRESS of employees in Kensium soft:
TABLE 4.3.1 Correlation for Pre-test and post test
Item correlation item1 0.2734477 item2 -0.249644 item3 0.0429187 item4 0.1046618 item5 0.0967356 item6 0.1132643 item7 -0.064634 item8 -0.09343 item9 -0.117878 item10 0.0293326 item11 -0.096918 item12 -0.014332 item13 0.0298807 item14 0.1679236 item15 -0.300128 item16 0.3293231 item17 -0.03441
item18 …show more content…
The individual’s relation between EQ & Stress is calculated by conducting a pre-test and post –test and the correlations is calculated. This reveals that there is about 50% of the employees are high in balancing the EQ and Stress where as 50% are low.
TABLE: 4.3.2 T-Test
Item T-test item1 0.2062306 item2 0.7116123 item3 0.3186668 item4 0.794059 item5 0.9094672 item6 0.7055776 item7 0.3141547 item8 0.7772549 item9 0.5450636 item10 0.961176 item11 0.8569299 item12 0.8430365 item13 0.3746384 item14 0.5209 item15 0.2731336 item16 1 item17 0.8011795 item18 0.3734119 item19 0.9557773 item20 0.5817432 item21 0.8535167
item22