Preview

Analysis Lamb To The Slaughter

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
484 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analysis Lamb To The Slaughter
Mary had a little Lamb “So i've killed him” is what Mary had said in the passage “Lamb to the slaughter.” This is a story about a woman,named Mary, who killed her husband because he has told her he was going to leave her. When she heard that she couldn't understand why, so she decided to kill him with a lamb. Being a wife of a detective she knew that nobody would suspect from her so she planned everything. When the police came by they thought that it would be impossible for her to have killed her own husband so they went with the story that tit had been someone else that had gone away. The police believed everything and ate dinner with her they ended up eating a lamb which had been the same Lamb that Mary had killed her husband with. A central idea that this passage conveys is that individuals in power often underestimate their opponents. Many people that have power always underestimate their opponents. In the passage,the police didn't expect Mary,the wife, to have been the one to have killed her own husband,because of the way that she was acting. In the text it states, “acted quite normal...very cheerful...wanted to give him a good supper...peas...cheesecake...impossible that she…”From this piece of evidence, it can …show more content…
In the text it states, “she wants us to finish it.She said so.Be doing her a favor.” This evidence shows how the authority has no clue that Mary was the one that killed her husband. The police could have asked Mary more questions about where she had been. Instead the authority ended eating the murder weapon that might have imprisoned the criminal. They assumed that everything the wife had done was because she wanted to make supper for her husband,but it is all a plan to be able to get away with the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    First, Mary Maloney had killed her husband because he wanted to divorce. In anger Mary got a leg of lamb from the freezer and after hearing the news of wanting a divorce, Mary acted fast with disapproval ,and so” she swung the leg of lamb high and brought it down as hard as she could on the back of his head”(Dahl 3).This proves that Mary defeated her demons and had not wanted a divorce so she took matters into her own hands.Second after killing her husband should found a successful and creative way to hide the crime. after killing her husband she decided to cook the leg of lamb so she “... placed it in a pan and turned on the oven on high and shoved it inside.”(Dahl 4) What's my reason because Mary killed her husband and couldn't deal with the fact that she was going to jail for those acts, so she covered up the crime and successfully defeated her demon. In conclusion, Mary had successfully defeated her demons and was able to progress in…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Killing your husband is not a big deal, right? Not for Mary Maloney. A casual day is not typically when your house is turned into a murder scene. Sometimes you can’t blame people for their impulse actions; for example, Mary Maloney.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In short story, Lamb to the Slaughter, an old devoted wife, Mary Maloney, waited for her husband, Patrick Maloney, to return home from work as a police officer. He arrives home around the usual time he comes home every night. This night Mary notices that Patrick seems to be out of it and is acting weird, but she just assumes he’s tired from work. Finally, Patrick exposes his reason for acting so strange. He never states exactly, but it is inferred that he is leaving her for another woman. Mary, still in shock goes to the freezer to get a leg of lamb to cook for dinner. She continues to go in as if her husband didn’t just reveal to her that he is leaving. Patrick screams to Mary not to make dinner and she snaps. She hit him in the back of his head with the frozen lamb. Mary intentionally kills her husband. She feels as though if she can’t have her husband then no one can.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    She then continues telling the truth, but Abigail and the other girls tell the court that she is lying. They then start to act as if Mary is a witch or is possessed by the devil. They scream of nonsense such as Mary is a bird, on the ceiling. They then act as if Mary is possessing them and they repeat every word Mary says. Mary starts to get scared and she then realizes that she does not want to be on the opposite team as Abigail is. She then turns her back on the truth and John Proctor. Mary then tells the court that John conjured her to tell these lies. Mary also apologizes to Abigail and tells everyone she is with the Lord now. But really if she was, she would have told the truth not matter what circumstances took place. Mary Warren is a coward and has weak faith in the Lord. Mary could have been the one who saved many innocent people from being accused but she was too scared of one person to do this. Mary changed throughout the story by being a follower, to being wise and doing what is right, to a…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    business law

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages

    John suspects that as there was no reference in the claim to any emergency or even any details of patients etc put at risk by the accident, that Mary was in fact on her way to the nearby McDonalds family restaurant and had used the siren and its privileges to save time.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters clearly did not have respect for the law. They both kept the evidence that Mrs. Wright killed her husband a secret. These two women put themselves in Mrs. Wright shoes. They understood why Mrs. Wright killed her husband. They both knew that if their husband had treated them the way Mr. Wright treated Mrs. Wright that they would have probably done the same thing. They also snuck Mrs. Wright things in prison that they were aware she was not suppose to have. “Mrs. Peters is governed by this dogma, until she remembers the silence in her own house after the death of one of her children. This memory produces a powerful bond between her and Minnie 's experience of isolation and loneliness, so powerful, indeed, that Mrs. Peters herself attempts to hide the box with the dead canary in it—fully aware that this action goes against everything society and her husband expect her to do, not only on legal grounds but also because, as a wife, Mrs. Peters is not supposed to act against her husband” (Brown 2011 ). These two women were not close to Mrs.Wright but illegally hid evidence in this case in her favor.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The people that were evidence were not trustworthy. One of these conspirators, Booth, said “In the presence of almighty god, I swear Mrs. Surratt is innocent of the crime charged against her.” Both the article and the book agree Powell was freely giving all information correctly and without flaw. We can conclude that Powell was telling the truth at this time, Powell was trustworthy when he said this. Mary Surratt was, as Powell said “innocent of the crime charged against her.” Powell is not the only person to claim Mary Surratt was innocent…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Becky Cress, William’s wife and Mary Norcom, James’ wife were women who could not control their husband’s actions. Since both Becky and Mary suspected that their husbands were having a sexual relationship with their servant, they insisted that the servant left the house immediately. Even though Rachel and Harriet were removed from their master’s household, their masters continued to visit them at their new home trying to have sex with them. When Mary had Harriet sleep with her so her husband could not and so she could “protect” Harriet, Harriet said, “she whispered in my ear, as though it was her husband who was speaking to me, and listened to hear what I would answer.” (140) When Mary confronted her husband about the issue, he did not stop his sexual overtures. After Becky heard William trying to kiss Rachel in the cellar, Rachel said, “she had caught him & he wd deceive her no longer, but William denied any wrongdoing and Becky left in tears. These verbal confrontations apparently did not alter William’s behavior; he continued to force himself sexually upon Rachel.” (140) These two wives show that they had no power over their husband. They confronted their husbands about the situation and all they did was deny their behaviors, which lead to Becky and Mary not undertaking any actions to put their husband’s sexual overtures to an end. If Becky and Mary really wanted their husband’s sexual relationship with their servant to end, why didn’t they remove their husband from the…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I am here to present to you the guiltiness of Justine Moritz for the murder of the beloved William Frankenstein. To start it off, Justine doesn’t have the most reliable alibi from that night due to the staying out late, even though many witnesses saw her out late. Also, we know that one of the most crucial manifest of this murder is knowing that the locket seen on William just hours before his murder was suspiciously found in Justine’s pocket the day after. Unfortunately, it is a misfortune that I have to stand before all of you proving the guilt of this kind women, when it is just as easy to see past the evidence and go from what I feel in the heart. As she speaks, you can just hear the innocence in her voice as she utters, “God knows, how entirely I am innocent… and I hope the character I have always borne will incline my judges as a favourable interpretation,” (Shelley 65). However, it is my duty to prove to you why you must not follow your emotions, yet rather the staunch evidence stated in this argument. Even though she may use her charm, by the end of this argument, you will be surely convinced that Justine is guilty because of her suspicious alibi and noteworthy locket.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Regarding the text, there is not concrete evidence to prove she is guilty, but it can be continue to assume that she is guilty because she is not affected at all, and she has an answer for every argument. This Peculiar behavior shows her tragic flaw.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Devices

    • 852 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “The very law that condemned her…had held her up, through the terrible ordeal of her ignominy.” (Pg. 66)…

    • 852 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Let you not mistake your duty as I mistook my own. I came into this village like a bridegroom to his beloved, bearing gifts of high religion; the very crowns of holy law I brought, and what I touched with my bright confidence, it died; and where I turned the eye of my great faith, blood flowed up. Beware, Goody Proctor - cleave to no faith when faith brings blood. It is mistaken law that leads you to sacrifice. Life, woman, life is God's most precious gift; no principle, however glorious, may justify the taking of it. I beg you, woman, prevail upon your husband to confess. Let him give his lie. Quail not before God's judgement in this, for it may well be God damns a liar less than he that throws his life away for pride. Will you plead with him? I cannot think he will listen to another.”…

    • 855 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lamb to the Slaughter

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One of the saddest and the most beautiful stories that I’ve ever read is The Scarlet Ibis. It is so sad and so beautiful at the same time it makes you want to put the book down and never pick it up again but you can’t because it is so beautiful and touching and it relates to how so many people feel, when they are embarrassed or lose a loved one. The author James Hurst, who grew up in North Carolina, where the story takes place had many experiences with some of the same things that he talks about in his story. The Scarlet Ibis the title of the story relates to two things the bird and to Doodle. The narrator is reminded of the bird at the end of the story when Doodle dies. James Hurst says that the Scarlet Ibis is a symbol of courage and perseverance which defines Doodle’s character quite well. There are many symbols in the story that hint what’s going to happen like in the first couple of paragraphs talk of life and death such as “It was the clove of seasons, summer was dead but autumn had not yet been born.” And, “The last graveyard flowers were blooming , and their smell drifted across the cotton field and through every room of our house, speaking softly the names of our dead,” this suggests right away that the story is about life and death.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Betrayal is not a necessary part of life as evidenced in Roald Dahl’s “Lamb to the Slaughter” And Shirley Jackson’s “The lottery”. Lamb to the Slaughter was a story where. Mary Maloney was going to have a son, but the husband had to leave because having a family wasn't going to be good for his job as a detective. Leaving her is an act of betrayal “I know it’s a bad time to be telling you this, but there was simply wasn't any other way. Of course, I’ll give you money and see you’re looked after” (Dalh Pg.2). Betrayal should not be a necessary part of life because the husband wants to leave her and the unborn baby. He wants to leave his family just because of his job. He maybe does this for their protection, but he betraying the family. Mary…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After Mary had killed her husband, she then proceeded to cover up her story like it was nothing. When the cops arrived at Mary’s house she showed great signs of remorse however it was all an act. She then convinced the cops to eat the lamb chop in which she used to kill her husband with. While they were eating it they said “I bet the evidence is right underneath our noses” “and in the other room she started to giggle in the other room.” This shows how she almost had no feeling for killing her husband and that she is mentally unstable.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays