The author uses numerous pieces of evidence from Spygate to prove that the Patriots were guilty. They interview people who worked for the Patriots to explain the magnitude of spygate. All of the Patriots success was viewed as the result of cheating. I believe that the Patriots were guilty in spygate, …show more content…
The author writes, “It didn't matter that the Patriots went 18-1 in 2007. Or that they would average more wins a season after Spygate than before. Or that Belichick would come to be universally recognized as his generation's greatest coach. Or that many with the Patriots remain mystified at the notion that a historic penalty was somehow perceived to be lenient. The Patriots were forever branded as cheaters -- an asterisk, in the view of many fans, forever affixed to their wins.”
And then there was deflategate, an incident that took place at the AFC Championship game. The Patriots’ footballs were inflated under the required PSI level. However, the game was played is extremely cold weather, so the cold could have deflated the balls just as it does to tires on a car. There is still question whether or not the opposing team, the Colts’, balls were also inflated. People believed that a Patriots’ ball boy deliberately deflated the balls on quarterback Tom Brady’s orders. Even if the balls were slightly underinflated, they did not have too big of an impact. Running back LeGarrette Blount ran for 148 yards and three touchdowns. An underinflated football would not have a big difference in the running game. A private investigation was done by Ted Wells and he found that it was “more probable than not” that Tom Brady was involved in deflating the balls. Goodell then suspended Brady for four games and punished the …show more content…
Just because the Patriots cheated once, people expect them to do it again. Many people believe the harsh deflategate punishments were a “makeup call” for letting the Patriots off easy in spygate. Although, the punishments to Tom Brady were completely unnecessary. There was no hard evidence that proved Brady was involved. After Brady’s appeal, Goodell upheld his 4 game suspension because Brady declined to hand over his cell phone. Brady shouldn’t have to, as the current collective bargaining agreement does not require him to do so. Brady’s appeal went to a judge, where his suspension was overturned. Goodell’s plan to defame Brady to make himself look like a legitimate disciplinary force came up short. Ultimately, Goodell’s job is not to damage the reputation of players, and him doing so is overstepping his authority. You have to play by the rules as well,