Preview

Amendments In The United Sates Constitution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
689 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Amendments In The United Sates Constitution
Amendments in the United Sates constitution have changed our government and our society. Amendments are usually ratified due to social events that occur over time .Ideologies also pay a considerable role to the ratification process as well. If it wasn't for political groups such as The Anti-Feudalist we may not have obtained the 1st amendment which sates "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." (The Bill of Rights) Another Amendment which is coherent to the 1st is the 10th Amendment which states "The powers not …show more content…
If it wasn't for king George being a tyrant under colonist eyes we may have never obtained the first amendment .The act of spreading tyranny over the colonist solidified the colonist under one principle which was the view that Monarchies are unacceptable and that a Republic is desirable to the commonwealth of the people. King George oppressed the colonist by rendering there legislatures useless by overruling them. Founders of 1st Amendment realized the significance of rights people must have in order to maintain a Republic. what. The rights to freedom of speech, Press, religion and to assemble are all heavily relayed on to maintain a Republic because the belief was that without one of these rights a Republic may alter into another form of tyranny or crumble …show more content…
One party consisted of Federalist as the other party consisted of Anti-Federalist .The Federalists which had the belief that the United States should be unified under one central government . The Articles of The Confederation where too weak as extensive problems raised under this document .(such as the high tariffs for crossing from one state to another to import/export goods)Although some Anti-Federalist admitted that The Articles of The Confederation where inefficient most Anti-Federalist believed that the Article just had to be revised. The reasoning behind this was that the Anti-Federalist strongly feared not having a Republic (or a Democracy) in which the people's views were not expressed. Some Anti-Federalist held the belief that a Republic can't truly be an Republic if an larger-scale Republic overshadows it. An agreement was later reached which lay in the constitution the core principle of the Anti-Feudalists beliefs. The 10th amendment was ratified due to the Ideologies of the Anti-Federalist and there position of feudal government boundaries on American society

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the year 1787, early America, officials and delegates came together to form a constitution that would restore the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation was the attempt at creating a government for the newly independent America. But, it soon became clear that the document was not strong enough to govern America. Therefore, delegates who came to be known as Federalists and Anti-Federalists issued major arguments on the ratification of the U.S Constitution. Federalists were individuals who wished to unify the 13 states in negotiation, and anti-federalists were individuals who wanted a weaker central government. George Washington and the federalists argued that a stronger central government would accommodate everyone including farmers and merchants. Meanwhile, the leader of the anti-Federalists, Patrick Henry, reasoned that the development of this constitution may threaten the rights of people in the states. While the federalists and anti-federalists were arguing over how much power the government should hold, they eventually made compromises and ratified the U.S. Constitution. With these compromises the delegated created a constitution that still governs us to this day.…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Founders’ perceptions were that America was weak and de-centralized. They created a weak, confederal government designed to protect people’s liberties by being to small to be a threat, but it was too small to handle national problems. The differences between the Articles of Confederation and the US Constitution are that one, the US Constitution has a Bill of Rights, the power of the president is addressed and the separation of the branches. This changed occurred to make the government stronger and address the nation’s problems. The Anti-Federalists were a large group who didn’t like the Constitution but didn’t know what they wanted yet and they contributed to the branches. The Federalist were defenders of the constitution and they contributed to the bill of…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Amendments 1-27

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Every U.S. jurisdiction has its own regulations regarding what, precisely, must be said to a person arrested or placed in a custodial situation. The typical warning states:[3]…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the Constitution was first drafted it unknowingly started the creation of the Anti Federalists. The Anti Federalists were a group of people that did not want the Constitution because they believed it would bring a strong central government, which they absolutely did not like. Anti Federalist believed that a strong central government would bring tyranny and violate the citizen’s natural rights.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Branches of Government

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the beginning before the Constitution was drafted, the founding founders were concerned about how to solve the issue of a weak central government. The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists had different ideology and views in regard to the issues at hand, but had the common goal of ensuring the government would be protected against any assembly having the ability to become overpowered by another.…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many antifederalists did not want the government to have so much control over America. Amending the articles would require the confirmation of every state legislature. Unlike the king of Britain, the antifederalists were against one person ruling America and so they refused to appoint one single president under the Articles of Confederation. This created a weakness in the government. Under the Articles, the individual states would be represented by one to seven delegates with each state holding only one vote in Congress. The Articles gave the individual states more power than the federal government. When Congress needed money, it would have to ask the individual states to contribute money to the federal government. This complicated the government and made it extremely inefficient. Additionally, all of the judicial power would be given to the states. Regulation of commerce would be regulated by treaties that would hold no check on conflicting state regulations. The Articles of Confederation essentially gave much more power and control to individual states than to the federal…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should the Constitution be amended to limit representatives, senators, and members of the judiciary to 12 years of total service?…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anti Federalism Dbq

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages

    under the Articles of Confederation, just edit it a little. They wanted the states to hold the supreme power rather than the national government. Most feared that the constitution would turn our government into a monarchy. Brutus I made the statement, “And are by this clause invested with the power of making all laws, proper and necessary, for carrying all these into execution; and they may so exercise this power as entirely to annihilate all the state governments, and reduce this country to one single government.“ The name Anti-federalist is actually misleading, they were actually more for federalism than the federalist, as they wanted the power more separated to the states. Their thoughts were that a government under the constitution would lead to corruption as the power hungry federal government would become corrupt and try to consolidate all of the power.“In the new Constitution, the President and Senate have all the executive, and two thirds of the legislative power. In some weighty instances, (as making all kinds of treaties, which are to be the laws of the land,) they have the whole legislative and executive powers. They, jointly, appoint all officers, civil and military; and they (the Senate) try all impeachments, either of their own members or of the officers appointed by themselves.“ -Richard Henry…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    These first amendments were key to the new nation ensuring that every American citizen had ten basic rights protected by law. Examples of this include freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, the rights of assembly and petition, and the right to refuse housing of soldiers. All of these are evidence because before amendment about the housing of soldiers, people would have soldiers living in their house for an extended period of time without their consent, and before freedom of religion, speech and press, and rights of assembly and petition, people couldn't choose the religion they wanted, people couldn't publicly display their opinions in something like the newspaper, and people couldn't gather and protest like they do…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Amending the Constitution

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why? You have two distinct advantages in the House that you don't have in the Senate: (1) you are a senior and respected member, and (2) a block of House members already supports the amendment. If you succeed in the House, your odds of also succeeding in the Senate are increased because the House vote may convince many skeptical senators.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1787 when the U.S. government was frail under the Articles of Confederation there was a debate on whether to ratify the U.S. Constitution. Those who supported the ratification were the Federalists, and those who opposed were known as the Anti- Federalists. Federalists believed in the idea of a strong central government while on the other hand Anti- federalists wanted their own states to have the right to set their own laws.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    No more would a monarch would be able to use its divine power to take political enemies to jail. People now can assemble and boycott unfair laws or taxation, write newspaper and use the freedom of speech to say what they truly feel and if an unjust government tries to imprison them for doing such they would not have the authority to curly punish or put a bail impossible to pay. Without these amendments America, today would probably be different and America might be ruled by a tyrant, fallen to pieces or taken over again by…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the U.S. Constitution being the longest written constitution throughout the whole world's history, there were many debates and arguments against it prior to its indoctrination (Wallace, 2015). Anti-Federalist mainly preferred small government tactics of the Democratic-Republic (Schultz, 2016). In contrast, the Federalist believed that its current government was too weak to enforce its laws under the Articles of Confederation (Wallace, 2015). In return, this brought about the Federalist fight for a stronger central government. Also, Federalist wanted to develop a first-class industrialist country that distributed throughout the whole world to other economies (Schultz, 2016). Federalist argued that a large, diverse, and populated country…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    What is your thesis statement? __”The infringement on the Second Amendment and the domino affect that’s sure to follow, has brought up a lot of concerning issues of American’s, based on the government’s actions.”…

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    3 important amendments

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Bill of Rights was a group of 10 amendments that were ratified to insure the new government did not have too much power and to make sure the citizens’ rights were protected. Of these 10 amendments, I feel there are 3 that stand out and are the most important. The 4th amendment, which prohibits unreasonable searches. The 5th amendment, which protects the right to a fair and speedy public trial by jury. And most importantly, the first amendment, which protects the freedom of speech and religion. Without these 3 amendments, I believe the country would fall apart.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays