Preview

Am228

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1144 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Am228
MALAYSIA LEGAL SYSTEM
LAW OF TORTS – TRESPASS TO PERSON 1. Assault * Wrongful act of threatening, with intention to cause reasonable fear of immediate battery by the wrongdoer. * Everyone is protected of the fundamental right not to be assaulted without justification.

Elements of Assault i. Intention of causing fear by the wrongdoer. ii. Capability of the wrongdoer to carry out the threat iii. Reasonable for claimant to feel fear of such threat

2. Battery * Wrongful act of intentionally touching without lawful justification. * The person who is being touched did not consent to the act. * Touching in violent manner. * Eg: threatening, slap.

Elements of Battery i. Intention of the wrongdoer to touch. ii. There is physical touching towards the claimant body or clothes iii. No consent was given by the claimant to the act of touching.

3. False Imprisonment * Wrongful act of detaining someone without lawful justification. * The person is denied their freedom of movement.

Elements of False Imprisonment i. Intention of the wrongdoers to detain the claimant. ii. There is detention and the restraint must complete.

Defences in Trespass to Person 1. Self-defence and defence of property, injury or damage suffered by the plaintiff is caused by the defendant. 2. The defence’s necessity – to save life.

Law of Torts – Negligence * Negligence is a breach of duty of care, which results in damage to the claimant. * Case of Donoghue v. Stevenson (1932) * Mrs Donoghue went to a cafe with a friend. The friend brought her a bottle of ginger beer and an ice cream. The ginger beer came in an opaque bottle so that the contents could not be seen. Mrs Donoghue poured half the contents of the bottle over her ice cream and also drank some from the bottle. After eating part of the ice cream, she then poured the remaining contents of the bottle over the ice cream and a decomposed

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pa201 Unit 3 Assignment

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Negligence is defined as “the failure to exercise the standard of care that a reasonably prudent person would have exercised in a similar situation; any conduct that falls below the legal standard established to protect others against unreasonable risk of harm.” Black’s Law Dictionary 1133 (9th ed. 2009) …

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    IS3110

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Install a backup service that will provide onsite and off-site backup solution for all data on the servers.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Cheeseman (2013), negligence is a "A doctrine that says a person is liable for harm that is the foreseeable consequence of his or her actions" (p.91). The elements of negligence include:…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    GBL 295 EXAM 2

    • 1533 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Tort: A “Civil Wrong” Torts refer to a general classification covering civil causes of action…

    • 1533 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Battery- intentional physical contact harmful or offensive to another person: the completion of an assault…

    • 1189 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hcr Week 8 Legal Terms

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Defendant: The person who is being sued or who needs to defend themselves in court…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One very important issue in this case and many civil lawsuits is negligence. Negligence is when there is a failure to use reasonable care which results in injury or damage to another. It also asks who is responsible for one’s injury. In this case, Mrs. McKoy claims her injuries were caused by T & J’s negligent behavior. In order to prove negligence, T & J must be guilty of five elements: duty of due care, breach, factual cause, proximate cause, and damages.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A negligent act is an unintentional but careless act which results in loss. Only a negligent act will be regarded as having breached a duty of care.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    AMH2010

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Martin Luther King Jr. once said “Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter”. He understood that although a person is breathing, he is not truly alive unless he is living for a purpose. A good life is one that is lived with the intention of constantly bettering oneself and the world in which they live. Unfortunately, this life can only be attained by making sacrifices. Time and independence are both expenses that must be paid in order to live a meaningful, and therefore good, life.…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Negligence In Health Care

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Negligence is the breech of an obligation or duty to act with care, or failure to act as a reasonable or prudent person under certain circumstances. Actual loss or harm must occur in order for negligence to be considered. If loss or harm has occurred as a result of negligence, the act is considered a tort, and damages may be recovered ( money or form of compensation awarded by law as the result of the negligent action). Torts are willful or unintentional wrong doings committed by one individual to another. Negligence is often caused by conduct that is unintentionally or intentionally reckless, careless , or dangerous, or by avoiding responsibilities all together.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The four elements of negligence must be present in order for a plaintiff to recover damages cause by negligence. These are duty to care, breach of duty, injury, and causation. In duty of care, there must be an obligation to conform to recognized standard. In breach of duty, there must be a deviation from the recognized standard of care and there must be a failure to adhere to an obligation. In injury, there must be actual damages. And lastly, in causation, the departure from the standard of care must be the cause of the plaintiff’s injury (Pozgar, 2012, p. 33).…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Non Fatal Offences

    • 2940 Words
    • 12 Pages

    • S
2
Crimes
Act
1961:
 • “Assault
means
the
act
of

intenTonally

 applying

or

a\empTng
to
apply
force

to
the
 person
of
another,
directly
or
indirectly,
or
 threatening
by
any
act
or
gesture
to
apply
 such
force
to
the
person
of
another,
if
the
 person
making
the
threat
has,
or
causes
the
 other
to
believe
on
reasonable
grounds
that
 he
has,
present
ability
to
effect
his
purpose.”…

    • 2940 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Introduction The duty of care arises in the tort of negligence, a relatively recently emerged tort. Traditionally, actions in tort were divided into trespass and trespass on the case, or simply ‘case’. Trespass dealt with the situation where the injury was immediate, in other words direct and foreseeable. Actions based in case however, covered consequential injuries in the case of libel or deceit, etc. An underlying problem of this approach was that there was no fundamental principle or test that was applicable to a novel set of facts. A broader formulation was introduced by Lord Esher (then Brett M.R.) in Heaven v Pender [1883] 11 Q.B.D. 503. This broader formulation was very much the precursor to the modern doctrine of negligence. Lord Esher, essentially proposing a doctrine of foreseeability, explained why a duty might be owed by one party not to injure another. He stated that “whenever one person is by circumstances placed in such a position with regard to another, that everyone of ordinary sense would at once recognise that if he did not use ordinary care and skill in his own conduct with regard to those circumstances he would cause danger or injury to the person or property of the other, a duty arises to use ordinary care and skill to avoid such danger.” The Elements of Negligence Since this case, a number of elements have been established in order to prove the tort of negligence. Firstly, there must be a duty of care. Secondly, there must be a breach of this duty of care. Thirdly, there must be loss or damage and fourthly, there must be a causal link between the breach of the duty of care and the loss or damage suffered. The Duty of Care In Lievre v Gould [1893] 1 Q.B.D. 491, Lord Esher stated that “the question of liability for negligence cannot arise at all until it has been established that the man who has been…

    • 2500 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Terrorism Notes

    • 2186 Words
    • 9 Pages

    US Criminal Code: Any activity that involves criminal violence that appears to be intended to:…

    • 2186 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Malaysian Legal System

    • 1723 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1. No person may be deprived of his life or personal liberty except in accordance with the law. This means that the individual cannot be unlawfully imprisoned or put to death. Where the individual is unlawfully detained, he may obtain an order of the court through a writ of ‘habeas corpus’ requiring that he be lawfully charged in court or be released.…

    • 1723 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics