Preview

Alice Hocker's Your Greatness Is Not What You Give

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1105 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Alice Hocker's Your Greatness Is Not What You Give
Alice Hocker correctly stated, “Your greatness is not what you have, but in what you give,” (“Your Greatness Is Not What You Have But In What You Give”). Alexander was someone who took from others. He had a lot of land, money and things he did not need but wanted. Alexander, the King of Macedon, took thousands of lives and seized land the size of the US. If people judged Alexander on what he gave than he would not be known as Alexander the Great, but as Alexander the Annihilator. Alexander was born in Macedonia. His Father was King PhilipⅡ and his mother was Olympia. Olympia was one of seven wives King Philip had. Alexander’s father wanted the best of the best to educate him. A Greek philosopher, Aristotle, became his teacher and taught him …show more content…
Alexander’s father, King PhilipⅡwas murdered by one of his own bodyguards, Pausanias. Alexander and his father had a rocky relationship. Evidence found has made historians believe Alexander was involved in the murder. According to Ancients Behaving Badly, “After his father’s death, Alexander put a surplus of gold in his father’s tomb,” (Ancients Behaving Badly). This shows that Alexander was a coward because guilt pushes people to do things they wouldn’t normally do. Guilty people who hide from the consequences are cowards. Brave people take responsibility for what they did and face the consequences, but like Alexander, cowards put people off their trail and blame others. Alexander had a close relationship with his mother. She loved him very much and thought very much of him. Ancients Behaving Badly says, “After his father died, rumors said that two of King Philip’s other sons were in line for the crown. Olympia and Alexander were very upset. Olympia wanted her son to be king. Historians can agree that Olympia was involved in the king’s murder and Alexander knew of the plans. They also can agree that she had something to do with assuming the throne instead of the other two suitors,” (Ancients Behaving Badly). This proves that Alexander was a coward because leaders need to be truthful and proud of what they did to gain their position. People need leaders to be strong and genuine to lead them and be able to …show more content…
Alexander the Great while on his march across the surface of the Earth came and ended in India. In India Alexander had a war against King Porus at the Hydaspes River. According to Arrianus, “Alexander and his army had no chance against against Porus’ elephants. He saw a way. His army surrounded and boxed in the elephants causing a stampede that destroyed their army,” (Arrianus Document B). Although, Alexander had one creative strategy when fighting Porus, overall King Alexander of Macedon lacked creativity. Along the way of conquering land from Italy to India, Alexander set up multiple garrison towns. Garrison towns are control centers for the soldiers to live. According to Document A, “Thirteen garrison towns were set up around the empire. Eleven Alexander named Alexandria, after himself,” (“Alexander’s Empire” Document A). This proves that Alexander did not have creativity because creativity is an important part of leading large armies fighting hundreds of battles. And creativity is changing things up making differences, which is not what Alexander did not do.In summary, Alexander the Great was not genuinely great because of his lack of creativity, although some may disagree saying he was

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages

    All throughout school teachers have taught students that Alexander The Great was indeed great but, is this really true? He did conquer much land and spread greek culture throughout Europe but not many people know what he did to his men in order to do this. One way that he torched his men to get what he wants is in Document D when the man went through all that work to get him his hat back after it falling into the water than killed him. He did this because in order to get the hat back without getting wet he would have to place it on his head. Since he placed in on his head he had to get it cut off because it says “he should not allow the head that had worn the royal head band to be safe” (Document D). He did this to show the rest of his men…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On the other hand Alexander the Great was not so great because many tactics where inherited from his father,Philip II. Alexander's father had many tactics such as the phalanx, however Alexander decided to improve on his father's idea and make it better and stronger so he could defeat more enemies. The phalanx was his fathers idea but improving on the idea shows that he was intelligent and skilful. This shows that…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexanders respect of other people's beliefs was one of the biggest reasons he is considered great. While other conquerors in this time period, like the persians, would try to destroy and get rid of other people's cultures Alexander would study and learn from them. He did this to such an extent in Egypt that they even referred to him as a god and pharaoh. In other places he would study their beliefs, and try to understand them as a people, and he may have been doing this to learn how to control them, but based on his character it is more likely that he did it so learn how to respect them.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Secondly, Alexander was arrogant and cocky. “Alexander believed himself to be Achilles’s descendant.” (Document A). Alexander also believed “...that he himself was a god.” (Background Essay). How incredibly arrogant and full of yourself do you have to be do have such incredibly high standards for yourself? How does that make him a “great” man? Someone who is known to be “great” normally wouldn’t have an ego the size of Texas. They are much more modest than…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander is a cheater and a liar, “Alexander cheated The Gordian Knot by cutting it with his sword because he refused to lose”. Alexander was a very drunk man and liked to celebrate and when he was drunk one of his military leaders would take over whall…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great was, in many ways, an amazing ruler. He was not afraid to take a chance on someone or something that everyone else had given up on, and he was prepared to risk his safety to help his men. Alexander also proved to his men that he was strong and that he was prepared to die for his cause.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page

    Many people think that Alexander the Great was truly great because of all his accomplishments, but not all of the things he did were great. He did lots of cruel things to people and animals just because he wanted to gain more power. Alexander has killed approximately 100,000 people only in four major battles (Alexander’s Legacy Doc E). Alexander was a prince who was born in macedonia of 356 BC. Alexander was very arrogant. He was taught by a philosopher Aristotle. He taught him subjects like, politics, sports, and warfare. Philip, Alexander’s father built the macedonian army into a deadly fighting machine, this sparked alexander’s interest and was eager to to lead the army. And Alexander got his chance to lead at the age of 20, because Philip…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Well, our opinion is that Alexander the Great is great. He was attacked by the Persian and he successfully defeated them. Alexander moved south along the eastern Mediterranean. Many cities surrender the Alexander the Great. Some of the men that was in the other armies that they were in, transferred to Alexander’s army. In 332 B.C.E Alexander entered the world of egypt, a country that had experienced on and off periods of Persian rule for two centuries. With Mediterranean and Egypt secured, the Persians were deprived of naval bases and Alexander was free to move inland to conquer the eastern half of the Persian Empire. Alexander had sources of 1 million troops to take over states and cities. Darius III on the other hand brought soldiers all over and even beyond his empire. Persian was on a rampage and Alexander continued to battle against them until they…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alexander the Great like most heroes in history have traits that makes it possible for him to be able to do great things. Alexander of Macedonia was a 20 year old leader who got his empire from passed down from family, Macedonia and city-states in Greece. Alexander decided to attempt to conquer the entire Persian Empire, from Egypt to India, In this process he did things historians question made him great or not. Alexander the Great was great because of his intelligence, empathy for others and leadership.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander was a very efficient leader able to win people over and not lose their attention and such. He made quotes that would stick with people throughout time. Such as “I am not afraid of an army of Lions led by sheep. I am afraid of an army of sheep led by…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He had the courage and the will to do what no other king has done.His courage contributed greatly to his success hence the name, Alexander The Great. In the Background Essay, it claims that Alexander set off to conquer Persia almost right after he inherited the throne. Most people might think that he was stupid and that he was a madman to try and achieve that. But he did it, he took down the Persian army. Alexander The Great’s legacy spread Hellenization throughout the known world at the time. Hellenization is the spread of Greek culture and language, culture and population. It took a lot of courage and self esteem to be able to spread the Greek language among the conquered lands because he didn’t know if the people would hate it or not be he did it anyway. He could have faced rejection. At the end of it all, Alexander had courage like no other…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander The Great

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Alexander III of Macedon also known as, Alexander the Great, made a name for himself many years ago, but today his “greatness” is being questioned because of research conducted due to modern technology. To be viewed as great, one would need lots of evidence supporting they are a well-rounded person. I believe that Alexander had rightfully earned this title because through my research I have only found evidence that Alexander was a man of greatness. Although Alexander displayed many characteristics of greatness there are three that have stood out me, his strategy, selflessness, and influence. These reasons show clear support that Alexander was Great and never anything less.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    AP World History

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2. Alexander was the son of King __phillip________ II, and when just 13 years old he tamed a horse no one else could ride named Bucephalus, which impressed his father so much he said: “Oh thy son, look thee at a kingdom equal to and worthy of thyself, for Macedonia is too little for thee.”…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many people around the world have heard of Alexander III of Macedon, better known as Alexander the Great. One does not have to be a historian to know of his near deity-like status among the Greeks and other cultures in his time, as there have been books, movies, and other forms of media that tell of his conquests and his rise to prominence as a military commander. This paper will focus on two biographies of Alexander the Great written by two different authors, W. W. Tarn and J. R. Hamilton, and their personal thoughts on Alexander’s characterizations and motives.…

    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the month of October the great King of Macedonia, Alexander the Great, was born. He was the son of Philip II, who is considered as an excellent general of Macedonia, and princess Olympias of Epirus. He inherited the best qualities and character of both of his parents. His father possessed strong and determined abilities of a real general and his mother was unreliable and out of control. Throughout his childhood, most of his friends were women. Lanice, who is a nurse, took good care of Alexander during his early life. Her younger brother, Clitus, was Alexander‘s playmate and considered one of his faithful friend. Alexander's early life was just like an ordinary Greek life. He often played hoop and balls and enjoyed night stories. In his seventh year, he was assigned to a teacher who taught him good manners and conducts as well as kept him out of trouble. Leonidas, a relative of his mother became his tutor. He was a really strict person and somewhat a disciplinarian but a very effective and efficient teacher to Alexander. His intellectual capability was seen at age ten. At this early age, he was already reciting the Iliad. He was also subjected for hard trainings and physical work-outs that taught him of survival of hardships and neediness (Cummings 49-51).…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays