Preview

Alexander The Great Sources

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1498 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Alexander The Great Sources
The leader of the Macedonian empire in , Alexander the Great was feverishly expanding his empire when in 333 B.C.E he crossed paths with the mighty Persian Empire led by King Darius. The subsequent battles between the two sides are very nuanced and are recanted in different fashions by the different parties. The goal of this analysis is to decipher some of the accounts of the battles and attempt to piece together what the actual events may have been. In this analysis, we will be focusing on four key sources for the battles between Alexander and Darius. The first is the writing of Arrian of Nicomedia in his book ‘The Anabasis of Alexander’. Arrian is a Greek historian who lived within the Roman Empire from 92 to 175 C.E, more than 400 …show more content…
Looking at the text by Arrian, the Zoroastrian Arda Wiraz and the film “In the Footsteps of Alexander the Great”, which is a contemporary film reflecting a modern day historian’s account of the events, we can highlight a few key differences in how these sources reflect the events. One key differences between the sources is how they reflect the way Darius died. In the writing of Arrian the death of Darius occurs after Alexander had “ascertained that be had been arrested and was being conveyed in a covered carriage (“The Anabasis of Alexander 4.11.186-187”) Once discovering this development about Darius Alexander’s army attacked the Persian’s who were now led by Bessus and the vulnerable Darius was assassinated in the carriage where he was held a prisoner. The film tells a similar story including that Darius was held prisoner and died in a covered carriage, but an important conversation is included into the story where Darius tells a Greek solider to relay to Alexander his gratitude for treating his family graciously in captivity and that “he in turn will rule the world just as Darius had done” (In the Footsteps of Alexander). In the Arda Wiraz it is said that Alexander “slew the ruler of Iran”(Arda Wiraz) in reference to Darius, not at all specifying the slaying was done. Another difference between the texts is how they view Alexander. Zoroastrians view Alexander as a horrible man, “the wicked one”(Arda Wiraz) who destroyed their culture while Arrian’s text portrays Alexander as a hero, a man who galvanized others and “recapitulated as modestly as possible his own daring deeds in the various battles” (Anabasis of Alexander 1.7.92) . Lastly, the film shows Alexander in contrasting ways from different aspects of the piece. The films narrator projects Alexander as a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the meantime while Alexander is occupied luring Darius’s cavalry out, the two forces marched towards each other and started a battle. In the midst of the battle it was without a doubt as how Alexander’s general had predicted; Alexander left and center army would be struggling against the Persians and their wagons that had spears pointing out of the wheels. The purpose of the wagons are counter against the phalanx 18 inch spears by having a heavy wagon ramming through the phalanx and sweep any soldiers caught in the spears sticking out of the rims (Yenne 76). While Alexander’s left and center army was struggling against the Persians wagons, Alexander had finally lured Darius’s cavalry long enough and hit a u-turn going forty-five degrees towards the center of the Persian army, where Darius was located in (Yenne 75). And miraculously for Alexander all goes well for him and Darius fell for Alexander same tactic a second time and was faced with Alexander and his cavalry charging toward him after a successful tactic by them.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Alexander was tempted to chase after Darius, but with his camp being raided and Parmenion surrounded, Alexander ordered his troops back. He then aided to Parmenion and slaughtered the Persians who were coming back from raiding his camp (“Battle of Gaugamela”). With exemplary leading, strategic planning, and patience, Alexander had earned one of the most decisive and stunning victories…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The writer agrees with Denise that Alexander the Great led his troops to win several battles .However, the writer believes that Alexander the Great was both effective and efficient in this battle by the way he used his strategy and planning against King Darius troops.…

    • 92 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Now, instead of simply discussing his most glorious battle and successful expansion of his empire by overthrowing the Persian Empire. And although they were a major success to his rising to power. People must be able to understand exactly how even after defeating his enemies, Alexander ran these new additions to his empire and effected them through cultural influence. While Alexander was exceedingly bright, some may have doubted how he chose to run them. Even after the overthrowing of Darius III, Alexander still wanted to add more to his empire. He even went as far as India to overthrow, which only failed due to homesick soldiers. Thus, this had to be Alexander's greatest flaw, he didn't know when enough was enough. Now, back to subject at…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, the Persian Emperor Paries lll, was brightly intelligent and his army outnumbered Alexander’s. By surprise Alexander denied the offer from Emperor to surrender all the Persian Empire west of Euphrates, and proceeded to invade the rest of Persia. Alexander mind was set on one thing only; that was to conquer the entire empire, which was just what he did. Persian grew a massive love for Alexander once the made the attempt to merge the Greek and Persian cultures, but they we’re both holding important positions. By doing so this caused him a lot of hardship once he begins to rule the former Persian Empire. Even though he adopted the Persians ways of governing; while keeping the Greek cultural ways. Alexander looked to create a new-found life with the empire, but not to exclude, but those in Greece started to resent him while the was away in Persia. The attention that Alexander showed the Persians, made those in Greece feel jealous a d the citizens began to…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexanders respect of other people's beliefs was one of the biggest reasons he is considered great. While other conquerors in this time period, like the persians, would try to destroy and get rid of other people's cultures Alexander would study and learn from them. He did this to such an extent in Egypt that they even referred to him as a god and pharaoh. In other places he would study their beliefs, and try to understand them as a people, and he may have been doing this to learn how to control them, but based on his character it is more likely that he did it so learn how to respect them.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander accomplished many feats thought to be unattainable. “Alexander and his army marched for 11 years over 22,000 miles and never lost a battle against the strongest foes of his time” (Smith 1). He gained so much land in such a short amount of time from the biggest and strongest empire at the time. Alexander made all of this possible by leading the army through many of these battles. People might say that the Persian Empire was already beginning to fall (Smith 1), but even though they might have begun to weaken they were still the most powerful empire at the time.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Alison Fong Ms. Wetzel English II Honors, Period 3 20 October 2014 Alexander the Great: The Military Genius Imagine crossing thousands of miles of scorching desert, rugged mountains and endless plains on both foot and horseback while commanding and maneuvering an army. Throughout history, there have been legends of heroes facing impossible trials. Alexander the Great is a legendary figure that did the impossible. Leading thousands of men across a continent is challenging enough on its own, but Alexander the Great took this challenge even further. He took the most demanding and laborious paths possible during his campaign to expand his empire, and he succeeded (Romey).…

    • 2296 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Alexander portrayed by Arrian in his The Campaigns of Alexander, is an interesting and complex Alexander, a character that slowly grows, matures and evolves throughout his adventures in new lands. Arrian is able to give an in depth description of the battles Alexander took part in as well as the lands he traveled to, while at the same time describing Alexander’s character. He is able to describe how Alexander goes from an over-confident youth, with great dreams of grandeur, to an adult who remains almost the same but more wise, and then finally a sad shadow of his former self who finally dies in depression.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Well, our opinion is that Alexander the Great is great. He was attacked by the Persian and he successfully defeated them. Alexander moved south along the eastern Mediterranean. Many cities surrender the Alexander the Great. Some of the men that was in the other armies that they were in, transferred to Alexander’s army. In 332 B.C.E Alexander entered the world of egypt, a country that had experienced on and off periods of Persian rule for two centuries. With Mediterranean and Egypt secured, the Persians were deprived of naval bases and Alexander was free to move inland to conquer the eastern half of the Persian Empire. Alexander had sources of 1 million troops to take over states and cities. Darius III on the other hand brought soldiers all over and even beyond his empire. Persian was on a rampage and Alexander continued to battle against them until they…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Document C illustrates how Alexander was able to defeat the Tyre which was a self proclaimed “unconquerable city” because it was built on an island protected with high walls. “ The great city…. Was now utterly destroyed. Her king, Azimilik, and various other notables, including envoys from carthage, had taken refuge in the temple of Melkart, and Alexander spared their lives. The remaining survivors, some 30,000 in numbers, he sold into slavery, Two thousand men of military age were crucified.” (Doc C) Although some might argue he isn't great because the deaths of two thousand military man are quite brutal he did it out of pure leadership in order to finish the battle he started. Alexander stepped up as a leader and was able to lead men into a battle and defeat the unconquerable city. Also In Document C, another battle or march, Alexander shows leadership, “Alexander had ordered that all [expect] those who sought sanctuary were to be slain” (Document C). This shows Alexander was great by leadership because he made the big decision for his troops on what to follow out, even though it was a rough game plan, he stepped up and took charge.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Persian empire at its peak has long been seen as one of the largest wholes during the classical era, and few have rivaled its size. The land that Alexander the Great was able to conquer, however, was one of the few that served as an appropriate challenge. Around the time of 338 B.C.E through 323 B.C.E., Alexander's collected mass was a whole. Of a Greek origin, Alexander was taught by Aristotle, the great philosopher, and it can be inferred that he used the strategic methods learned, among other things, to assist him during his expansion. It was short lived, however, when he died of an unknown cause at an early age of thirty-three. Even though his empire crumbled, his legacy lived on. Multiple cities, strongly influenced by Alexander, erected,…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In defense to Alexander, it could be put into perspective that Alexander did some of his most questionable actions to prove his political validity and power to his followers. For instance, when Philotas is informed by Dymnus of the conspiracy against Alexander begins to suspect that Philotas is behind the plot, he tortures him and eventually orders for his father Parmenio to be assassinated. While it may seem inhumane to have someone executed on such little evidence, had Alexander not ordered him to be tortured, it could have led to Alexander's army questioning Alexander's power. This could have also lead to various more threats on Alexander's life. Suppose Philotas…

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The winner of this battle is Alexander. Darius army is destroyed which means anybody could conquer Persia. As Darius was leaving the battle field he left 4,000 talents, chariots and bow, and his war elephants which Alexander used them as a reward for himself and his army. Darius fled the battle and…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    (the curtain opens behind the narrator and the scene inside the palace is taking place)…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays