Preview

Airport Security Vs. Privacy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
762 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Airport Security Vs. Privacy
Airport security is a critical element in safeguarding the American people and maintaining national security. One of the many ways in which airport security is being conducted is through body scanners. The Transportation Security Administration, or TSA, has installed new body scanners that are used to check suspected terrorists. At first the new body scanners were completely optional, but now the TSA has revised its rules stating that opting out is no longer an option for some passengers (Elliot). According to a statement by TSA spokesman Bruce Anderson, most people will have the ability to opt out; however, some passengers will be selected to undergo advanced-imaging screening (Elliot). Many feel the new rule is a violation of their Fourth …show more content…
The supporters of personal privacy cite a variety of arguments against government measures used to promote security. For instance, some people question the safety of body scanners used in airports. However, the strongest argument that advocates of personal privacy use is the Fourth Amendment. They claim the Fourth Amendment guarantees freedom from “unreasonable searches and seizures” (Wilson 5). Based on their interpretation of the Fourth Amendment, supporters of privacy believe this …show more content…
The Fourth Amendment can be interpreted in many different ways; in fact, it causes controversy and confusion over the topic of national security and privacy. Even though the concept of privacy was included in the Fourth Amendment, the word “privacy” never appears in the Constitution (Mills 196). The absence of the word “privacy” shows that it was not one of the main concerns being addressed when the Constitution was written. National security, on the other hand, has been an important issue addressed throughout history. Many laws have been passed to promote national security and allow government surveillance. Although some opponents of government surveillance view these measures as an infringement of their privacy, many people are willing to sacrifice privacy for the sake of national security. In March 2015, a Pew Research Report showed Americans have mixed feelings about government surveillance (Wilson 6). The “study indicated that a slight majority of Americans report being “not very” or “not at all” concerned about government surveillance” (Wilson

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Our forefathers with great fortitude put together a document that would be forever known as the constitution. This document addressed the rights of the citizens of the newly formed states. One amendment has been a focal point of discussion in recent weeks with the leakage of NSA protocol. The fourth amendment states, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place…

    • 2530 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fifteen years ago, the United States wasn’t involved in any wars. Few of us had heard of al-Qaeda or Osama bin Laden. ISIS didn’t exist. But so many security measures were taken, prompted by the 9/11 attack. Many attitudes changed and concerns rose regarding to safety and vigilance. It started a new generation of policies such as the USA Patriotic Act. National security and defense became a priority, often at the expense of civil liberties. Not long after the attack, the federal government created the Transportation Security Administration (TSA)and the Aviation and Transportation Security Acts (ATSA). The TSA was enforced to protect the nation’s transportation systems to ensure freedom of movement for people. ATSA is a federal legislation designed…

    • 164 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The TSA (Transportation Security Administration) has many issues and has caused many problems. Some people are saying that the only way to fix these problems that the TSA created is to privatize airport security. The TSA was created when congress passed the Aviation and Transportation Security Act. Their main focus was to keep anything that could be used as a weapon off of airplanes. Over the years the TSA has banned various items and has added new security procedures, such as taking off shoes. As a result of this, the lines have gotten drastically longer and and people are getting upset because they are missing their flights. Also, because of the cookie cutter type of security, it leaves little room for the TSA to change and adapt to new…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Concerns of and further decreased in 2013, when leaks of information of the NSA spying and disturbing privacy of U.S. citizens became publicly known. The NSA’s acts go against the fourth amendment, thus showing the amendment is no longer in full effect, causing citizens to believe the amendment will soon be completely repealed removing the remaining privacy citizens have and further violate their rights. A great number of the general public disapprove of the government collecting data on U.S. citizens.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Rubel, Alan. "Privacy and the USA Patriot Act: Rights, the Value of Right, and Autonomy." Law and Philosophy 26.2 (2007): 119-59. JSTOR. Web. 10 Oct. 2011. .…

    • 2253 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Airport Security Essay 9

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages

    America on September 11, 2001 required that we reform our nation 's aviation security system in fundamental ways. Three years after the Sept. 11 tragedies, how far has airport and airlines come? It depends on the source. While it is important for airports to heighten security after the attacks of 9/11, the policies of profiling passengers are inadequate and a necessitate revision.…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All citizens of The United States deserve their privacy, but in those emergency situations where you have to invade someone’s privacy for the greater good of others than that’s acceptable. The Fourth Amendment offers and important safeguard against unjustified government surveillance, all of us are granted that right when we are born in the United States.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Is it acceptable for the government to search if it has no reason to suspect a person has done something wrong? Today’s application of the Fourth Amendment would surprise those who drafted it and not just because they could not imagine technologies like the Internet and drones. In the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, policing consisted of citizen patrols or a loose collection of sheriffs and constables, who lacked the tools to maintain order as the police do today. That said, to determine if the right to privacy is a threat to our national security, I reviewed the Fourth Amendment, the government’s use of surveillance, and arguments for as well as against its use.…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The concept of living in a surveillance society with no fear as long as individuals have nothing to hide sounds ideal; but even if people are not guilty of committing a crime, there are a number of reasons why loss of privacy should concern them. A significant concern is that the…

    • 1755 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Common Ground

    • 1599 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Both authors share a common concern as to whether the new backscatter scanning technology protects the nation without breaking the citizens’ constitutional right to privacy. Bradshaw argues that in most cases, using backscatter technology does not violate Fourth Amendment…

    • 1599 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a result of the attacks on the date of 9/11, Congress passed the Patriot Act. The Patriot Act made the government’s ability to spy on individuals easier, but also weakened the checks and balances our country relies on. So in essence, the threat of terrorism against our country paved the way for violating one of our basic civil liberties under the fourth amendment of the constitution – the ability to live free of unreasonable searches and seizures. However, the ability for government agencies to obtain information quickly and without warning becomes a powerful tool against terrorism.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Domestic Surveillance is a withering matter which not many people care about because they think that it does not affect them. However, it is common in the daily lives of American citizens. But the question remains, how much does the U.S. government know about your personal privacy? Face it, it is a fact the United States peers on our personal life more than what you may think, and it does, in fact, appertain every single citizen of our nation. It is hidden, bathed in laws but linked to another.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author of this article is Daniel J. Solove. He discusses the different perspectives and opinions of various people of the government’s control of viewing personal information. The article demonstrates this through examples of what people say, book references, and the opinion of the article himself. In the article, “The Nothing to Hide Argument”, Daniel J. Solove argues that the information- gathering programs the government uses to track and record information from people are problematic.(739) This still remains the case even if the information gathered from these programs was information people did not mind being uncovered. (739).…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Binks Vs Mckay Case Study

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On May 12, 2016 the court case Binks/McKay vs the United States challenged the idea of the Fourth Amendment. The case explains the situation between Binks and McKay, who claimed that the FBI violated their Fourth amendment rights when the FBI searched through their Facebook messages after being suspected of being terrorists. This occured when Binks and McKay were discovered to have been communicating with a supposed ISIS member. They had claimed to have no intentions of joining the terrorist group. In this case, Sam and Melanie (petitioners) reminded us that a warrant and reason for searching is a necessity when it comes to violating one’s right to privacy. However, court justices Danny and Nick both asked similarly: “Why do you think that violates their privacy?…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “TSA says the scanners add another layer of security at checkpoints besides metal detectors, explosives-detection systems and bomb-sniffing dogs” (Jansen). What that is saying is that the scanners check for things that metal detectors, explosive-detection systems and bomb-sniffing dogs might not be able to find. “The threats the machines could have detected include the shoe bomb Richard Reid attempted to detonate, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab’s underwear bomb, and two non-metallic explosives in Yemen printer cartridges” (Jansen). Full body scans are just another way to ensure the safety of others.…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays