Preview

After the Revolutionary War

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1590 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
After the Revolutionary War
After the Revolutionary War, many Americans realized that the government established by the Articles of Confederation was not working. America needed a new form of government. It had to be strong enough to maintain national unity over a large geographic area, but not so strong as to become a tyranny. Unable to find an exact model in history to fit America's unique situation, delegates met at Philadelphia in 1787 to create their own solution to the problem. Their creation was the United States Constitution.

Before the Constitution could become "the supreme law of the land," it had to be ratified or approved by at least nine of the thirteen states. When the delegates to the Philadelphia Convention signed the Constitution on September 17, 1787, they knew ratification would not be easy. Many people were bitterly opposed to the proposed new system of government. A public debate soon erupted in each of the states over whether the new Constitution should be accepted. More important, it was a crucial debate on the future of the United States.

The Federalist Papers
Nowhere was the furor over the proposed Constitution more intense than in New York. Within days after it was signed, the Constitution became the subject of widespread criticism in the New York newspapers. Many commentators charged that the Constitution diminished the rights Americans had won in the Revolution.

Fearful that the cause for the Constitution might be lost in his home state, Alexander Hamilton devised a plan to write a series of letters or essays rebutting the critics. It is not surprising that Hamilton, a brilliant lawyer, came forward at this moment to defend the new Constitution. At Philadelphia, he was the only New Yorker to have signed the Constitution. The other New York delegates had angrily left the Convention convinced that the rights of the people were being abandoned.

Hamilton himself was very much in favor of strengthening the central government. Hamilton’s Constitution would

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the year of 1787, delegates met in Philadelphia to write the Constitution. Tyranny, a type of government with an absolute ruler was a fear. They were currently under the ARticles of COnfederation. There was a problem with this though. In the background essay, it states that “there was no chief executive, there was no court system, there was not even a way for a central government to force a state to pay taxes.”. They were in much need of a new Constitution if they were going to be an independent nation. The hard part was making the new government tyranny free. Eventually in 1787 the new Constitution is created.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the book “A Brilliant Solution: Inventing the American Constitution” by Carol Berkin she explains the constitution from start to finish from how it all began, to the debates inside the convention and finally the end product. Berkin takes the reader and puts him directly in the middle of the convention of 1786; throughout the book you can feel the excitement, the frustration, the tensions between delegates and the overall commitment to making a new government work for all.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The years 1776 to 1787 are often considered to be the most important and fateful when compared to all other epochs of American History: the now self-proclaimed Americans, having rebelled against royal authority, needed to develop a new system of government in order to survive. To accomplish such a feat, they needed a basis on which to establish this new authority. Established in autumn of 1777 and fully ratified in 1781, the Articles of Confederation was just this. These documents, at best a primitive constitution, were formed to be the basis of the federal government. While correctly serving as such, the Articles of Confederation subjected the United States to a series of problems in both domestic and foreign respects. Increasing in adversity with each aching year, these documents only brought about one good effect: they showed the Americans that a weak and disorganized government like the one during the Articles’ reign could never work.…

    • 2437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the United States of America won its Independence from Great Britain in 1776 many Americans began to have fidelity to their states instead of their country. Diverse citizens opposed to have an influential government. As a result, to the independent views of Americans the document Articles of Confederation was proposed. It was established with the primary purpose to balance the differences between states. Over time, this document became inadequate to govern itself and protect…

    • 196 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1786 Alexander Hamilton called for a Constitutional Convention to discuss the lack of a central government and to fix the Articles of Confederation. The colonies were told to send delegates to the convention. The 55 delegates met, they were composed of merchants, farmers, lawyers and crafters. They were supposed to fix the Articles of Confederation but they decided to create a whole new document and call it the Constitution. This new government would have three branches the Legislative, Judicial, and Executive. They also designed a system of Checks and Balances that would make sure that no branch would become too strong. They also made the Constitution able to be changed if necessary. Not all the delegates were professional people they were…

    • 152 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton want best for the country. There were many ideas that he wanted to apply to make the country a successful country. Hamilton said, “He wanted to develop a good relationship with Britain”(Doc 1). He thought it would be better to have a good relationship with Britain to not mess up trade and stay out of wars or disputes with Britain. Also they were too weak and were in debt because of the war they previously fought and would not be able to stand a chance in another war. Hamilton interpreted the Constitution broadly or loosely(Doc 1). He thought the country is maturing and changing as years pass and the Constitution should change along with the country. Hamilton want the best for the country to keep progressing and not lose the country they did so much for rather than himself.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Revolutionary- Federalist Era, politics, parties, programs, policies, and people made an enormous difference in how the new nation should be structured and run. During this era, two men in particular championed politics and their respective parties. These two men were Alexander Hamilton, a Federalist, and Thomas Jefferson, a Democratic-Republican. Both Hamilton and Jefferson were successful college educated intellectuals and politicians who made significant contributions to the development of the United States policies and programs. However Hamilton, despite never being elected President, had more influence over the development of the United States’ policies and programs during the Revolutionary-Federalist Era. Historically Hamilton and Jefferson are known for agreeing to disagree over just about every policy being discussed during the establishment of government structure, and decorum. And it is Hamilton’s policies on economics, government structure, and constitution interpretation, which took precedent over Jefferson’s.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After many long and hard years of constant fighting, turmoil, and endless bloodshed, the thirteen colonies finally separated itself from England. The country of America now had a new problem at hand, setting up an effective government that would be much better than the oppressive rule of the British. The first step, of course, is setting up a constitution. The Articles of Confederation, ratified in 1781, was the first constitution of America. The Articles of Confederation was strong in that it gave the central government the powers to conduct foreign affairs, regulate western lands, and set up departments. This constitution was weak in that the central government was unable to impose taxes, control international trade, or enforce laws, and it was difficult to pass any law. Even though the Articles of Confederation had its strengths and weaknesses, its weaknesses outweighed its strengths rendering the document useless in governing the new country.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton, one of the most important people of the time, was the first Secretary of the Treasury. Utilizing federal power to modernize the nation, he convinced Congress to use an elastic interpretation of the Constitution to pass laws that Jefferson deemed unconstitutional. These laws included federal assumption of the state debts, creation of a national bank, and a system of taxes through a tariff on imports and a tax on whiskey. Hamilton was also the creator of the Federalist Party. In contrast, Thomas Jefferson was born to a wealthy family but was nonetheless an anti-federalist. He was sympathetic towards the poor people and advocated state’s rights.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The states however were not satisfied if the requirements would be presented to them completely. For the most part some states led by George Mason from Virginia requested and enforced a Bill of Rights to be ratified before the final document was galvanized. Ratification for the Bill of Rights would prove crucial strain for the US Constitution simply because it would set thickened safeguards for citizens and protect rights of those accused of criminal infringements (O 'Connor and Sabato 2009, pg. 57). Enacted into law, the new Constitution was ratified and enacted. Everyone was not pleasant entirely with it. Benjamin Franklin…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1787 the Constitution was written and submitted to the states for ratification, this leading to months of fierce debate. Some states welcomed the new Constitution but others were fearful of it. They were afraid that this would be just like being under the control of Great Britain, which they just broke free from. But the rest of the states saw this as a good thing and very necessary for America to strive.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The Constitution was established by America’s national government and fundamental laws”, and guaranteed basic rights for American citizens. The constitution was made by Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Thomas Paine, and John Adams – George Washington had the responsibility of seeing the Constitutional Convention that took place in Philadelphia between May 5th, 1787 and September 17th, 1787.In order for the Constitution to be a part of the law, it had to be accepted by 9 of the 13 states. However, Massachusetts, Maryland and South Carolina refused to ratify it because it lacked protection of basic rights. In February 1788, an agreement was reached which Massachusetts and the two other states would agree to ratify the Constitution if amendments would be proposed. The Constitution was then ratified by Massachusetts, Maryland, and South Carolina. On June 21, 1788, New Hampshire was the last state to ratify the Constitution. The Constitution would then begin on March 4, 1789. The inauguration of George Washington to become president would take place soon after.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    He attempts to highlight those who oppose him so that the people of New York can understand the motives behind the resistance to the Constitution. Hamilton distinguishes his challengers by categorizing them into two different forms, the first as “[A] certain class of men in every State to resist all changes which may hazard a diminution of the power emolument, and consequences of the offices they hold under the State establishments” (Hamilton). This group of men is in opposition to the establishment of the Constitution due to their fear of a loss of power which is given to them by the states. Their power will be lessened due to the Constitution working as the supreme law of the land and forming a union that reduces the control of individual states. The second group of men that Hamilton describes are those who resist the forming of the Constitution so that they may take advantage of the nation, “[A]nother class of men, who will either hope to aggrandize themselves by the confusions of their country, or will flatter themselves with fairer prospects of elevation from the subdivision of the empire into several partial confederacies than from its union under one government” (Hamilton). It is by establishing the opposition, that Hamilton simplifies the arguments of those who are against him. He then goes on to display that these men who act wrongly, however,…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    2. Federalist Papers-aimed to convince Americans to accept the new Constitution. Published in New York. Written by Hamilton, Madison, Jay. Patrick Henry of Virginia and George Clinton argued against the constitution saying it takes away individual rights, replicates monarchy, and doesn’t have a bill or rights, and was illegal. The federalists had Franklin & Washington in their meetings=major plus. Led the Federalists to add a Bill of Rights. Clinton also published essay under the name “Cato” going against the constitution. See antifederalists, Hamilton.…

    • 3959 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution of the United States was written in 1787, yet there was a struggle for its ratification that went on until 1790. Members of Congress believed that the Articles of Confederation, the first government of the United States, needed to be altered while others did not want change. After the Revolutionary War, there was a need for strong state centered governments, rather than a strong central government based on their experience as a colony. However, an investigation of the historical record reveals that the Articles of Confederation were not meeting the needs of Americans, and the need for a new Constitution was desired. This desired Constitution created a huge dispute and argument between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays