Affirmative Debate Case

Topics: Maslow's hierarchy of needs, Abraham Maslow, Human rights Pages: 5 (1703 words) Published: December 13, 2012
The United States ought to extend to non-citizens accused of terrorism the same constitutional due process protections it grants to citizens. “If one devalues rationality, the world tends to fall apart.”  Lars von Trier  and with that, I affirm the resolution.

Core Value:
Value Criterion:
Self-actualization-the Morality, spontaneity, problem solving skills, lack of prejudice and acceptance of facts we revive through Maslows Hierchical pyramid which explains that self actualization can not be attained without ensuring the needs that are imperative. They are: Physiological needs like food water, safety needs like the security of the body, employment ,morality, health and property. More needs include love/belonging and dignity and esteem We as the USA uphold and mainly want the greatest good for the greatest amount (UDHR). This decree was essentially made by America and applied to the UN so other countries can have the same ideals of the USA. When we do not achieve the second and fourth step of Maslow’s Hierarchy, (safety and esteem) we are not able to achieve Self-Actualization we are not allowing them to fulfill essentially the meaning of life, self actualization. However, when we allow people to achieve Self-Actualization they serve greater good as stated before by , safety needs like the security of the body, employment ,morality, health and property. If we simply lash out at those countries who commit acts of terrorism, then we become as brutish and unwise as they are. Instead, we must use rational thought when encountering a situation such as terrorism. The safest route (in theory) would be to use rational thought for it is what separates us from beasts. We have the ability to keep ourselves safe by rationally attacking a situation and not always physically attacking a situation, which CAN hinder and HAS interfered with the US’ chance at safety. Terms:

Ought: Used to indicate duty or correctness typically when criticizing someone’s actions. Non-Citizens: A person who is not an inhabitant or national of a particular country or town. Citizens: A person who is an inhabitant or national of a particular country or town. Civility: formal politeness and courtesy in behavior or speech. Due Process: As defined by the 5th and 6th amendments:

5) No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. 6) In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.

Protection: a legal or other formal measure intended to preserve civil liberties and rights. Terrorism: a violent act or an act dangerous to human life, in violation of the criminal laws of the United States, or of any state, to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives. Accused: a person or group of people who are charged with or on trial for a crime. Ethical Egoism: the idea that one can keep others in mind whilst also benefitting from the help that is given to said persons. (Henry Sidgwick) Peers: a group of people typically around the same age and or merit. Contention 1: In order to achieve Maslow’s Hierarchy, the US must...
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Healthcare Debate Affirmative Essay
  • debate Essay
  • Essay about Debate: Case Affirmative
  • Debate second affirmative Research Paper
  • LD Debate Case Against Compulsory Voting Essay
  • Public Forum Debate Case Essay
  • Federalism in the Philippines (Affirmative Side for Debate) Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free