Preview

Adversarial System Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
151 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Adversarial System Analysis
In the United States we have an Adversarial system. Meaning that we follow a method designed to seek justice and ensure truth. This includes following the amendments that correspond with said process. Such as the Fourth amendment, which says, there shall not be illegal searches and seizures. The fifth amendment which states, that we have the right to not self-incriminate along with due process. The sixth amendment which states, that we have the right to a speedy trial by an impartial jury, in the state of which the crime was committed, the right to be informed of all accusations and charges, the right to attend trail and face accuser(s), the right to have counsel provided by the state if he or she cannot afford one, and the right to obtain

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    It is important that citizens have a suitable way of implementing their constitutional rights against the government; those rights may be emphasized both offensively and defensively. For example a person accused of committing a crime has a series of rights which are guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution and state laws. Therefore, if you have been accused of a crime, just how do you know if your rights have been…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Question that stretched through this case was concerned the Fifth Amendment protection against self incrimination or the Sixth Amendments which is right to have an attorney and whether Law enforcement officials must inform an accused of his fundamental rights. In…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due process prohibits the government from taking action against an individual that would result in a loss of liberty or property, without first affording that individual notice of the pending action, and an opportunity to be heard. The scope and applicability of these standards, with regard to government action, can range from situations in which the deprivation of life or liberty is severe such as a case in which a defendant is accused of murder…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Constitution, but the U.S. Supreme Court has said that several of the Amendments create this right. One of which is the Fourth Amendment. It stops the police and other government agencies from searching citizens and or their property without proof of incriminating evidence that is to brought forth before a judge should generate a belief that incriminating evidence can be found on the citizens/property. The law in this stance is simple one is very much entailed to their constitutional rights, up until the guilty verdict, where the first right you lose is the one most cherish the most, “right to privacy.” This by no mean gives way to not having an attorney present, sixth amendment as stated above, gives one right to counsel. In the case of evidence use, there were a couple of cases; Boyd v. United States and Weeks v. United States, that said the federal government couldn’t use evidence acquired through an illegal process due to an exclusionary rule and it would not be admissible in court. So, if the evidence is obtained legally, it is admissible in court. Most of the Amendments might not be as black and white as people would want them to be. Our forefathers left a gray area, which has now been left to the people of various sates to fill in. Though unknown by me, as to how affective Civil gang injunctions are, there was never injustice, or overstepped boundaries by the DA. East Side Riva gang members were nothing more…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda vs Arizona

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Bill of Rights guarantees that everyone has the right to due process. The U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark case Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966) changed our due process by adding additional procedures to how law enforcement handles a suspect and ensuring they know their rights as American citizens.…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adversary vs. Civil Law

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The two legal systems in question are the adversary system, most commonly practiced in the United States, and the civil law system, also referred to as the inquisitorial system, most commonly practiced in European countries. Both systems have the same goal; to find the truth. However, each system has a very different path to justice. The adversarial system implies that two parties assume opposite positions in debating the guilt or innocence of an individual. In this scenario, the judge is required to be neutral at the contest unfolding before him or her. The role of the judge in this arrangement is to ensure the trial proceeds according to the procedural rules of trial or due process of law and that evidence entered is done so accordingly. The basis of this approach in criminal matters in which two sides engage in debate and battle about the guilt or innocence of an accused and since each side wants to win, then the debate will foster a critical look at the issues and the evidence to be examined by both parties. By engaging in this discourse, the truth should emerge as the judge watches on. This means that the roles played on both sides are very distinct. The defense counsel as one adversarial party gather the arguments to defend the client and attacks the credibility and worthiness of the evidence presented. The prosecutor puts forth the arguments on behalf of the state and gathers and presents the evidence pointing that the accused has committed an offense. The judge is the referee and arbitrator on issues related to clarifying what the law is. The judge does not intervene on any side except where procedural fairness is jeopardized by either party as dictated by the Sixth Amendment. In an inquisitorial system, a judge is involved in the preparation of evidence along with the police and in how the various parties are to present their case at the trial. The judge questions witnesses in depth and can even call witnesses to appear while prosecution and defense…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1963, an eighteen year old girl was kidnapped and raped in Phoenix; AZ. Police officials felt that they had found their suspect in a man named Ernesto Miranda, who also happened to be a mentally challenged, poor, Hispanic male. He was taken into custody, where the victim identified him as her attacker. After, the police officials took him into an interrogation room where he was held for hours. He eventually signed a statement admitting his guilt. Miranda was then sentenced. He later appealed his case on the grounds of the violation of the 5th amendment. In the case of Miranda v. Arizona (1966), his 5th amendment right was violated because he was not warned that what he said would be held against him in court. In his appeal, his statement was inadmissible but that still wasn’t enough to convince the jury that he was innocent. Because of this violation of the 5th amendment, the Miranda rights were established. The Miranda rights allowed individuals, guilty or innocent, to understand their fifth amendment before signing or saying anything incriminating against themselves.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “The Fourth Amendment explicitly affirms the ‘right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.’ The Fifth Amendment, in its Self-Incrimination Clause, enables the citizen to create a zone of privacy which government may not force him to surrender to his detriment. The Ninth Amendment provides: ‘The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The United States has come a long way since the Constitution was created, and it has learned from the mistakes done. There has been a lot of cases where people did not have a fair trial and people has been sentenced unfairly. After serious mistakes, many bills have developed so the incident does not happen again. Unfortunately, people have to go through the worse so other people can benefit. After the case of Miranda v. Arizona, many people have benefit from it. Society as a whole has become better, and police officers now tell everyone their rights. We have come with the conclusion that everyone has the right to know their legal rights either by self-interest or because it is morally right.…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The U.S Constitutional amendments place limits on what law enforcement and how a trial should be governed. These strict rights are to be followed because if an officer fails to abide by the proper procedure, the trial court may forcibly put an end to evidence obtained in violation of proper procedure or even release the arrested suspect. This is an amendment that deals with each of the following: criminal due process, arrest, interrogation, search and seizure, Miranda, punishment, the right to jury trials, and the right to counsel.…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are many strengths of the adversary system. Party control is the first strength of the system. The parties are in control of their own destinies. That is, they must prepare and present their own cases and accept the responsibility for the consequences. This is an extension of the basic democratic principle. Truth and conflicting interests is another strength. By giving the parties control over their own affairs, it is more likely that ‘great truths will energy from the powerful conflicting arguments’. Equality before the law is another strength. The parties to the dispute are treated equally before the law. This is a fundamental element of the rule of law. The system also respects the fundamental legal rights of the individual, such as the presumption of innocence, the right to remain silent and the right to present your own case. The judge in the adversary system is completely independent and impartial and cases are decided purely on their merits in accordance with law. Strict rules of evidence are also applied so that both parties have a fair and equal opportunity to put their cases and that only reliable and relevant evidence is allowed. The strict rules of procedure dictate that the trial is one continuous event and that the party making the allegation has the burden to prove it to a strict standard of proof that limits the possibility of a miscarriage of justice. That is, the prosecution must present its case first at the trial.…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution protects a person’s rights by giving them the power to choose if they want to say self-incriminating statements. This can be noticed in the Miranda vs. Arizona case. The fifth amendment protects this. The sixth amendment provides that everyone has the right to an attorney.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    trial in court and to be judged by a jury of his peers. In a…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fifth Amendment places constitutional boundaries on police practices. The police officers has an obligation to warn the suspects that they have a right to remain silent, that anything they say may be used against them, and that they have the right to counsel.[1],[2] The Fifth Amendment can be broken down into five distinctive constitutional rights such as grand juries for capital crimes, a prohibition on double jeopardy, a prohibition against required self-incrimination, a guarantee that all criminal defendants will have a fair trial, and a promise that the government will not seize private property without paying market value.[1] The Fifth Amendment applies to the federal courts, the U.S. Supreme Court, and states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.[1]…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ethical extent of key issues confronting the criminal justice system and private security regarding due process and crime control are many, such as not knowing what the right course of action is, difficulty doing what is considered right, or simply finding the wrong choice to be very tempting. Due process is a citizens' right to proper legal representation, procedures, and justice of individuals, which decreases the power of government. The main goal of due process is to protect individuals from mistakes made by law enforcement agents and prosecutors. In contrast, crime control increases the power of the government in order to protect society, which diminishes an individual citizen’s rights (USLegal, Inc., 2001-2008). The main goal of crime control is crime suppression, which includes key issues of physical force, when to use deadly force, undercover work, deceptions, as well as many others in the criminal justice system. In the private security field, the key issues include the lack of training and violations of rules and regulations of the industry (Gould, 2008).…

    • 863 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays