Preview

What Does Miranda Rights Mean To You

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
524 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Does Miranda Rights Mean To You
What are the Miranda Rights and what should they mean to you? Why is exercising the Miranda Rights beneficial to you? Why are law enforcement officers required by law to advise an individual that is being investigated for a criminal offense of their Miranda Rights? Why should Miranda Rights be important to you? The Miranda Right should be important to you, because when being arrested, questioned, or investigated a person must know the constitutional rights that are given unto them so they know what they are able and unable to do.
The Miranda Rights are part of a preventative criminal procedure rule that states law enforcement are required to administer Miranda Rights to an individual who is in custody and is subject to direct questioning for a criminal violation of law. When a person is detained or taken into custodial arrest and interrogated for a criminal offense, if he or she wishes to remain silent the individual must expressly state that he or she chooses to remain silent. In addition, if the individual asserts that he or she wishes to speak to an attorney or have an attorney present, police must then cease interrogations and wait until …show more content…
The Constitution protects a person’s rights by giving them the power to choose if they want to say self-incriminating statements. This can be noticed in the Miranda vs. Arizona case. The fifth amendment protects this. The sixth amendment provides that everyone has the right to an attorney.
In conclusion, I believe that the Miranda Rights are and will forever be important to society. Everyone should have the right to an attorney, and also the right to remain silent. After reading this, what are your opinions on the Miranda Rights? Miranda Rights are very beneficial to people and the society of the United States of America. I encourage everyone to read about the Miranda Rights, because the person could learn a great deal of information on this specific
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Duties Of Citizenship In America
    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Duties Of Citizenship In America

    It is important that citizens have a suitable way of implementing their constitutional rights against the government; those rights may be emphasized both offensively and defensively. For example a person accused of committing a crime has a series of rights which are guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution and state laws. Therefore, if you have been accused of a crime, just how do you know if your rights have been…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of The Supreme Court Case Of Miranda V. Arizona
    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Summary Of The Supreme Court Case Of Miranda V. Arizona

    Reynold Lancaster discussed how the Miranda warning is used by police officers and other law enforcements when they arrest a person of interest. The Miranda warning allows the officers…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Miranda Vs. Arizona
    • 93 Words
    • 1 Page

    Miranda Vs. Arizona

    Does Miranda vs. Arizona ensure justice and preserve liberty? I believe it does. This even took place during the 1960s.The case in involve statements that were obtained for police from an individual that was arrest. Ernesto Miranda a Mexican immigrant, whom was not aware of his rights, was arrested without his Fifth Amendment given. He was accused of kidnapping and raping a woman. He was interrogated, without formal agreement to do so. Miranda was sentenced to 20 to 30 years in jail. When in court his attorney appealed to the Arizona Supreme Court.…

    • 93 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Case Study
    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Miranda Vs Arizona Case Study

    1. The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling of Miranda v. Arizona set a precedence on how future suspects would be interrogated. It makes complete sense to advise a person that is being interrogated that he or she has a right to remain silent during interrogation and that he or she has the right to have counsel present during an interrogation. It's also important that the suspect be fully aware and full understand his or her rights before the interrogation begins. -WRITTEN AND INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION-METHODS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT By Harvey Wallace and Cliff Roberson(CHAPTER 9 PAGE 136)…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Review for Exam 3
    • 941 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Review for Exam 3

    12. Under the Miranda rule, a statement made by a defendant in custody is admissible only if the defendant was informed prior to police interrogation of his or her constitutional rights.…

    • 941 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona Case Analysis
    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Miranda V. Arizona Case Analysis

    The Fifth Amendment which in 1934 the “which protects a defendant from being compelled to be a witness against themselves” (Wright, 2013). The self-incrimination portion of the Fifth Amendment was tested case of Miranda v. Arizona. This is the same case that leads to the Miranda Warning. The Miranda warning is an “explanation of rights that must be given before any custodial interrogation” so that self-incrimination will not be a factor. No person can be compelled to openly admit to a crime. They cannot try to pry information out of someone if they have not been read their rights or if they ask for their attorney. It is a different story though is someone just starts rambling on when they are not asked. “Suspects can reinitiate an interrogation by coming forward and indicating to police they wish to talk and are willing to waive their Miranda rights. If there is a break in detention, the police may reinitiate the interrogation after fourteen days” (Wright, 2013).…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Case Of Miranda V. Arizona
    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Supreme Court Case Of Miranda V. Arizona

    Supreme Court consolidated four separate court cases with issues concerning the admissibility of evidence obtained during police interrogations. All the defendants in each of these occurrences offered incriminating evidence during interrogations from police and were not notified prior to the interrogations of their rights granted to them under the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Miranda was arrested and taken into custody to a police station where he was identified by the witness. He was questioned for 2 hours by officers without being advised of his right to counsel and then signed a statement that said that his confession was voluntary. ISSUE: Whether the government is required to notify the detained individuals of their constitutional rights granted by the Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination prior to the individuals being interrogated by the authorities and assistance of counsel and give a voluntary waiver of these rights as a necessary precondition to police questioning and the giving of a…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Civil Liberties, Habeus Corpus and the War on Terror
    • 2236 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Civil Liberties, Habeus Corpus and the War on Terror

    Have you ever felt like a piece of cheese on a mouse trap just waiting for that mouse to come by and eat you; maybe even a fly stuck in a spider’s web hoping that you can get away? Well I am sure if I had been one of those people in the mist of the chaos on September 11, 2001 that had changed the life of all Americans’ across the country. I would have felt no bigger than that piece of cheese or that fly caught in the web. We were victims of a horrific terrorist attack that shook the very core of our foundation as a country. Twelve years later we are still recovering from this horrendous act. We have been fighting the war on terror for ten years. This is one of the longest wars that the United States has ever fought. While the war rages on the boundaries between national security and civil liberties are blurred. “The big threat to America is the way we react to terrorism by throwing away what everybody values about our country—a commitment to human rights” (Kennedy, 2007). Individual liberties and freedoms are important since without them one can be held indefinitely. Habeas corpus does not infringe upon a person’s civil liberties. In addition, habeas corpus allows an individual to question why they are being detained and ensures that detainees have a right to a fair trial; it is considered to be one of the foundations of constitutional democracy.…

    • 2236 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Apendix D
    • 355 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Apendix D

    |Court jurisdiction is determined by age |The purpose of the procedures is to punish |receive Miranda warnings. |…

    • 355 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Janet Ainsworth
    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Janet Ainsworth

    Ainsworth shows that this is not the case, as the reading of the Miranda Rights was brought about by the Supreme Court as a compromise to keep the effectiveness of interrogation without violating the rights of the suspect. By making the reading of the Miranda Rights legal and necessary, suspects are made aware of their rights but are not told how to bring them about. This also means that it is incredibly easy for suspects to waive their rights by simply using incorrect wording or even not speaking at all. The reading also serves the purpose of allowing police to interrogate. Of course, the very need for the Miranda Rights suggests that there is an innate injustice in the use of interrogation. This is because of the inherent power dynamic between the police officers and the suspects. Officers hold sway over the suspects and know very well how to use legal language. The typical suspect does not and because of this sense of powerlessness is therefore submissive to the officer, which leads to meek behavior and language. They lack the authority necessary in using legal language to bring about the actions they would require, such as a lawyer, if they even realized they were in need of…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Miranda Warnings
    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Miranda Warnings

    no. the miranda RIGHTS. protect our freedoms. without them we could end up a police state.In the United States, the Miranda warning is a warning given by police to criminal suspects in police custody, or in a custodial situation, before they are asked questions relating to the commission of a crime. A custodial situation is where the suspects freedom of movement is restrained although he is not under arrest. An incriminating statement by a suspect will not constitute admissible evidence unless the suspect was advised of his or her "Miranda rights" and made a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary waiver of those rights. However, police may request biographical information such…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Does Media Affect Police Brutality?
    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Does Media Affect Police Brutality?

    At the first class we talked about Miranda Rights. I was surprised to find out that police officers do not always have to read your rights if you get arrested. Police have the right to arrest you under suspicion but police only read you the Miranda Rights only if they start interrogating you. It is not just when they arrest you. I think that I get this notion that we have to be read our rights right after getting arrested stems from pop culture and media.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Miranda Warning
    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Miranda Warning

    Upon the case Miranda vs. Arizona the Supreme Court decided that citizens must be aware of their fifth and sixth Amendment rights upon questioning by the police. Fifth Amendment: “…No person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself…” Sixth Amendment: “…In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.” The Supreme Court created the Miranda warning that a police officer must read to the suspect before questioning if they wish to have the evidence obtained during the questioning used in the court of law. Miranda warning: “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to speak to an attorney, and to have an attorney present during any questioning. If you cannot afford a lawyer, one will be provided for you at government expense.” If the Miranda Warning was not read to the person in custody before questioning, any evidence obtained from the suspect during the questioning shall be…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Miranda Warning
    • 1682 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Miranda Warning

    Researching previous cases on a Miranda warning is one of the best ways to garner information as to the ways and procedures in how an officer goes about giving this warning. The main cases that will layout the foundation of this research is the original case of Miranda v. Arizona. In order to understand the main idea of what is the Miranda warning and how it is done, as well as the issues surrounding this warning then, one must study where it originated. During research it is concluded that such warning cannot be given without a person being in custody. Several informal talks with past law professors was done in attempt to prove whether or not the officer should have given Randy his rights prior to his confession of the bank robbery. During this several questions were addressed, questions such as, by law should a Miranda warning be given upon confession? Was randy in police custody at the time of the confession and when must this warning be given. The confession of randy cannot be ignored therefore some investigation must be done concerning the confession of the robbery. The elements of a bank robbery were researched as to come to a decision about the alleged criminal position of Randy. After which one must consider, was Randay’s alleged robbery an actual crime, what constitutes a crime? If the investigation of Randy’s confession is proven to be true, should he be then formally arrested by the officers? If the confessions are proven to be true then the officer should then give him the Miranda warning.…

    • 1682 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Search And Seizure
    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Essay On Search And Seizure

    The basis of the Miranda rights is that coerced confessions are unconstitutional and there might be a chance that they are not true. TO avoid these types of confessions officers are encouraged to follow specific steps prior to an interrogation. Police must explain to each suspect the right they have to not incriminate themselves under the Fifth Amendment, as well as the right to counsel under the Sixth Amendment. Even though many of these suspects will waive their rights and comply with the officers they must be knowing and it must be voluntary. If the suspects request to have a lawyer present the officers must then stop questioning the suspect until there is…

    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More