Federalism is basically a system adopted by a nation that allows two or more levels of government to have power over the same people and area. This, however, can lead to conflicts since the two governments might try to assert power over the same issue. This can be clearly seen in the Gibbons v. Ogden case. In this case, Chief Marshall was able to use the Commerce Clause of the Constitution to make clear that Congress, and not the states, has the power to regulate commerce between the states. Therefore, this conflict between the two levels of government was resolved by this court decision. If the United States had a unitary government, where all power resided the central government, this issue would not have…
The South did have some advantages though. Several Indian tribes joined the Confederacy, and the Union troops would have to move in and conquer the land, then force it to be a part of the Union again. They also had more talented military leaders than the North. But the North had more men, most of the railroads, and they controlled the sea. The government of the North was well established, and functioned with little difficulty in comparison to the new and hastily made government in the South. Both sides had disadvantages as well. The South began to run out of supplies, they did not have a major transportation system, and they had a weak economy. Some of their troops refused to fight outside their own states. The North’s disadvantages were the men being unprepared for military life, and poor choice of commanders.…
A Unitary, Confederate, and Federal System go hand-in-hand. As they are continuances of a unitary type, to a Confederacy with Federalism sitting in the middle. There are advantages and disadvantages of each system.…
One government can collect and avail itself of the talents and experience of the ablest men, in whatever part of the Union they may be found. It can move on uniform principles of policy. It can harmonize, assimilate, and protect the several parts and members, and extend the benefit of its foresight and precautions to each. In the formation of treaties, it will regard the interest of the whole, and the particular interests of the parts as connected with that of the whole. It can apply the resources and power of the whole to the defense of any particular part, and that more easily and expeditiously than State governments or separate confederacies can possibly do, for want of concert and unity of system. It can place the militia under one plan of discipline, and, by putting their officers in a proper line of subordination to the Chief Magistrate, will, as it were, consolidate them into one corps, and thereby render them more efficient than if divided into thirteen or into three or four distinct independent companies. If we entered battle what exactly would happen? How, and when, and in what proportion shall aids of men and money be afforded? Who shall command the allied armies, and from which of them shall he receive his orders? Who…
At the beginning of the Civil War the Union and Confederacy both had their own advantages and disadvantages. Neither the Union nor the Confederacy were prepared for war, however the North had a few advantages the South did not. The Union had more soldiers, more factories, and better railroads than the Confederacy. On the other hand, they were defending their homeland, the Confederacy had better morale and drive (Stewart). The higher levels of morale in the South, however, did not make up for their disadvantages in the beginning of the war.…
The Civil War ended in April of 1865, and it left many things behind to be dealt with. There were many issues, and in a lot of them the North and South had different point of views. Although the North was very rich, the South was tremendously poor. Despite the result of the Civil War, the Union acted like they were in control, and the South couldn’t do anything about it. One controversy that the North had was if they should allow the Southern states govern themselves. The North should not let the states in the South lead their own government. It would be too dangerous and would be a major setback toward the North.…
Federalism has been renovated to meet modern stability and progress. An advantage for the establishment of federalism include the closer ties between people and government…
The challenges that the Union and the Confederacy faced during the Civil War were very different. Critical weaknesses that seemed unfit for war, plagued the opposing American forces, and would serve to be a continuous obstacle that would need to be conquered by patriotism of the people, for their opposing views. To allow for both sides to be competitive, the efforts put forth had to mold to the varied needs of the armies by both the civilian population and their militaries. To the people in the south the similarity to the colonists in the Revolutionary War, was assimilated to their separatist cause in the Civil War and would be their drive to compete with the dominating Northern states. This mindset started the Confederacy in the Civil War, despite many disadvantages, with the confidence in defeating Union forces, before becoming overwhelmed and being defeated after four well fought years.…
The Union had a significantly larger population than the Confederacy. The Union had a population over 22 million people while the Confederacy had 9 million. The Union had a well organized government. The government was already establishment and experienced. They had an easier…
The Union and Confederacy both had advantages and disadvantages. The North had better advantages because they had a higher populace, more industry, and better assets than the South. It had a better banking system that they could rely upon to help them raise money for the fight. Furthermore, the North had more ships and a had a proficient and larger railroad framework. On the other hand, the South had the benefit of fighting in a familiar region protecting their property, homes, and families. Another favorable position that the South had was having that military training background on the battle field. The disadvantage that happened in the North were attempting to take the Southerners back to the Union, and by doing that they would need to attack and hold the South in their intimidating populace. The South faced material disadvantages. They had a smaller population of free man to manufacture an armed force. It had a couple of facilities to help distribute weapons, food, and other supplies. The South experienced issues conveying food, weapons, and supplies to…
A federal system checks the growth of tyranny, allows unity without uniformity, encourages experimentation, and keeps government closer to the people. In this system, the people are one with the government so the people like the government and it prevents chaos. In the twenty-first century,…
2. Federalism: Simultaneous federal/national and state/local governments; 2 levels of sovereignty operating at the same time over the people (viable national government that can behave effectively for all of the people, yet the benefits of diversity and decentralization).…
Looking back in history, America has always been under the federal government system. The federal government was establish by the Founding Fathers in order to create balance between the national government and the state government. Before a federal government in the United State, it was only two types of government; unitary and confederate. Looking at history, I agree that the federal structure fits the United States better than any other structure. What is a unitary and federal government? A federal government is when the power is divided between national and state. However, unitary government is when the national government controls the entire state. There are other types of government such as oligarchy, anarchy, democracy and more.…
They believed that the central government should not be able to make laws that affect every state. Each state should have be able to make their own laws and be able to govern themselves, in the opinion of the Confederacy. This is why when they thought their constitutional rights were being violated and slavery was coming to an end, they decided to secede from the union. They believed that if they seceded that they could govern themselves and the state would have control. This can be seen in that after they seceded each state had its own standing army rather than one with contributions from each state (Conradofontanilla. "Political and Economic Causes of the American Civil War."). On the opposite side were those in the Union. They believed that there should be a strong centralized government to keep the Union together and in sync. They viewed the nation as one big state rather than a bunch of states forced to cooperate under one leader as the south did. Due to this fact, Abraham Lincoln had never originally planned to end slavery. He believed that the Constitution did not provide the federal government with the authority to end slavery (05/31/13, Eric Black). He…
The president had the opportunity to serve a single six year term, and was given no permission on the power of the budget, he and his cabinet would also be awarded seats in Congress. In order to guarantee Southerners their much-desired states’ rights, “the federal government had no right to levy protective tariffs, make international improvements, or over-rule state court decisions. The states had the right to sustain their own armies and enter into separate agreements with one another as well as having the power to amend the constitution. Although there was a requirement for a federal Supreme Court, the southern legislators could never agree on its arrangement or its establishment, so the Confederacy lacked a high court throughout its existence.”#…