Both the article and the lecture discuss the unrealistic expectations for the “perfect” body that are created by the media and both sources cite individual studies that support the claim that the media profoundly affects how girls see themselves. The lecture cites the Fuji study which surveyed young girls after exposure to the media about how they saw themselves and most of the girls were more self-conscious of their bodies after seeing the images in the media. The article cites a study in which both males and females would take laxatives and hormones to be what the article referred to as “gender conforming” (Klass, 2016). In other words, they were trying to conform to the images seen in the media (Klass, 2016). The most pronounced difference between the article and the lecture were the main methods that were used to achieve this “perfect” body type; in the lecture, we discussed mainly anorexia and bulimia and the article mainly discussed laxatives and hormones. Also, though we did cover anorexia and bulimia extensively in class, I did not realize the number of adolescents who use laxatives and hormones to change their body and the study cited in the article by Dr. Klass that suggests more than one-tenth of both males and females have abused these substances is …show more content…
The article is written by a pediatrician who would certainly be considered a reputable source. The article itself cites a study with a very large sample size. The large sample size would ensure accurate results due to inability to bias and creating results that exclude unnecessary outliers. All the sources in the article are also doctors and, though the author is definitely a strong believer that the abuse of these substances has a high prevalence amongst adolescents, she backs up her belief with a study and facts. Overall, the article is trustworthy and it can be concluded that the approach the article takes (backing all claims with evidence) makes it a good choice for readers seeking accurate