Preview

Admin Law

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
44587 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Admin Law
ADMIN LAW

1. ANTONIO H. NOBLEJAS, as Commissioner of Land Registration, petitioner, vs. CLAUDIO TEEHANKEE, as Secretary of Justice, and RAFAEL M. SALAS, as Executive Secretary,respondents.
Petition for a writ of prohibition with preliminary injunction to restrain the Secretary of Justice from investigating the official actuations of the Commissioner of Land Registration, and to declare inoperative his suspension by the Executive Secretary pending investigation.
The facts are not in dispute. Petitioner Antonio H. Noblejas is the duly appointed, confirmed and qualified Commissioner of Land Registration, a position created by Republic Act No. 1151. By the terms of section 2 of said Act, the said Commissioner is declared "entitled to the same compensation, emoluments and privileges as those of a Judge of the Court of First Instance." The appropriation laws (Rep. Acts 4642, 4856 and 5170) in the item setting forth the salary of said officer, use the following expression: 1. One Land Registration Commissioner with the rank and privileges of district judge — P19,000.00.
On March 7, 1968, respondent Secretary of Justice coursed to the petitioner a letter requiring him to explain in writing not later than March 9, 1968 why no disciplinary action should be taken against petitioner for "approving or recommending approval of subdivision, consolidation and consolidated-subdivision plans covering areas greatly in excess of the areas covered by the original titles." Noblejas answered and apprised the Secretary of Justice that, as he enjoyed the rank, privileges, emoluments and compensation of a Judge of the Court of First Instance, he could only be suspended and investigated in the same manner as a Judge of the Courts of First Instance, and, therefore, the papers relative to his case should be submitted to the Supreme Court, for action thereon conformably to section 67 of the Judiciary Act (R. A. No. 296) and Revised Rule 140 of the Rules of Court.
On March 17,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Administrative Law

    • 9596 Words
    • 39 Pages

    Jeremy Waldron, Are Constitutional Norms Legal Norms?, 75 Fordham L. Rev. 1697 (2006). Available at: http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol75/iss3/24…

    • 9596 Words
    • 39 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Administrative Liability

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Ombudsman argued – in both the present petition and in the petition it filed with the CA – that Andutan’s retirement from office does not render moot any administrative case, as long as he is charged with an offense he committed while in office. It is irrelevant, according to the Ombudsman, that Andutan had already resigned prior to the filing of the administrative case since the operative fact that determines its jurisdiction is the commission of an offense while in the public service.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ← If you CANNOT succeed in an action under the ADJR Act by order of review (Statute), then look to s.39B of the Judiciary Act (CL).…

    • 8809 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Procedure

    • 4032 Words
    • 17 Pages

    • ex parte Island Records Ltd [1978] 3 WLR 23: If a without notice injunction is sought, the applicant must depose to damage and urgency in the supporting affidavits…

    • 4032 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Land Act Mauritius

    • 9559 Words
    • 39 Pages

    Act 46 of 1984 – 16 July 1984 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I – PRELIMINARY Short title Interpretation PART II – REGISTRATION DUTY 3 Duty leviable PART III – LAND TRANSFER TAX 4 Levy of land transfer tax 5 Exemption 6 Declaration by transferor 7 Penalty for incorrect declaration PART IV – CAPITAL GAINS 8 Interpretation 9 Levy of capital gains tax 10 Sale price and cost of infrastructure works 11 Contents of deed PART V – 12-15 PART VI – CAMPEMENT SITE TAX 16 Interpretation 17 Plan 18 Register 19 Declaration 20 Powers of authorised officer 21 Notice of entry on register 22 Removal of entry on register 23 Campement site tax 24 Appeal to Minister 25 Service of notice 26 Burden of proof PART VIA – TAX ON TRANSFER OF 26A Tax on transfer of leasehold rights in State PART VII – GENERAL 27 Assessment of cost of infrastructure works 27A Assessment of land and building 28 Valuation of property 29 Transfer of immovable property between 30-33 34 Amendment of tax and duty 35 Penalty for undervaluation 36 Payment of duty and tax 37 Inscription of privilege 38 Abatement or deferment of duty or tax 39 Payment of one tax only 40 – 41 Validity of notice by post 42 Recovery of duty 43 Refund of duty 44 Time limit for claims or refunds 45 Payment to be in multiples of 5 rupees 45A Derogation 46 Remission 47 Regulations 1 2 48-49 50 Application 51-52 FIRST SCHEDULE SECOND SCHEDULE THIRD SCHEDULE FOURTH SCHEDULE FIFTH SCHEDULE SIXTH SCHEDULE SEVENTH SCHEDULE (MORCELLEMENT) TAX – –…

    • 9559 Words
    • 39 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    First Regulation dealt with Revenue Administration and it was introduced on 8th June 1787. Second Regulation dealt with administration of justice and it was enacted on 27 June 1787. In each district a company’s English covenanted servant was appointed as collector who will collect revenue as well as will decide the all cases relating to revenue. Collector also worked as Judge in the district Mofussil Diwani Adalat to decide civil cases, succession cases and land related cases like boundaries etc.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tio V Abayata

    • 513 Words
    • 2 Pages

    FACTS: This is an action for annulment of mortgage, mortgage sale, a subsequent sale and certificates of title, filed by the successors-in-interest of Celedonio Abayata. It was respondents' contention that they are the absolute owners of the property in dispute, a 1,868-square meter parcel of land located in Lapu-Lapu City, Cebu, by virtue of a final Decision dated November 26, 1986, rendered by the RTC of Lapu-lapu City. Respondents alleged that through machinations, defendant Benjamin Lasola (Lasola) was able to register the property in his name under TCT No. 11428 and mortgage it to secure a loan from the Commercial Rural Bank of Tabogon (Cebu), Inc. (Rural Bank). In turn, the Rural Bank foreclosed the mortgage and sold the property to petitioners who registered the property under TCT No. 20006.…

    • 513 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DISCUSSION English Law

    • 219 Words
    • 2 Pages

     In this case, we can use Companies Act 1965 (Malaysia own statutes of Company…

    • 219 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The main issues presented for resolution in this petition for review on certiorari of the judgment of respondent Court of appeals, dated April 6, 1993, in CA-G.R. CV No. 34767 1 are (1) whether of not the "Exclusive Option to Purchase" executed between petitioner Adelfa Properties, Inc. and private respondents Rosario Jimenez-Castañeda and Salud Jimenez is an option contract; and (2) whether or not there was a valid suspension of payment of the purchase price by said petitioner, and the legal effects thereof on the contractual relations of the parties.…

    • 37874 Words
    • 152 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    SALES CASES

    • 65323 Words
    • 156 Pages

    The petition before us has its roots in a complaint for specific performance to compel herein petitioners (except the last named, Catalina Balais Mabanag) to consummate the sale of a parcel of land with its improvements located along Roosevelt Avenue in Quezon City entered into by the parties sometime in January 1985 for the price of P1,240,000.00.The undisputed facts of the case were summarized by respondent court in this wise:On January 19, 1985, defendants-appellants Romulo Coronel, et. al. (hereinafter referred to as Coronels) executed a document entitled “Receipt of Down Payment” (Exh. “A”) in favor of plaintiff Ramona Patricia Alcaraz (hereinafter referred to as Ramona) which is reproduced hereunder:…

    • 65323 Words
    • 156 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Digest Pale

    • 9375 Words
    • 38 Pages

    Lawyer was suspended for 1 year or until he has paid his IBP dues, whichever is later.…

    • 9375 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Suit House Case Study

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The plaintiffs claimed that they are lawful owners and possessors of the suit houses. Bhaskar (PW No.01) in his affidavit of examination-in-chief categorically stated that he and other plaintiffs have purchased the suit houses from their respective predecessor in title under the registered sale-deeds. Thereafter, they have obtained the building construction permission from defendant no. 04 and raised construction of the suit houses. The plaintiffs in support of the above oral evidence placed on the record the certified copies of the tax assessment list (Exh.No.20 to 24). On perusal of the certified copies of the tax assessment list (Exh.No.20 to 24), it is clearly seen that the plaintiffs are in possession of the suit houses. The oral…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    f. Los Subdirectores generales (Sub-Delegados del Gobierno) At this level authorities are not qualified as “Altos Cargos”.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Administrative Law

    • 42593 Words
    • 171 Pages

    Simeon Igbinedion, LL.B., LL.M., B.L., PH.D., Faculty of Law, University of Lagos. Professor Animi Awah Ifidon Oyakhiromen, LL.B, LLM, M.Phil, Ph.D, BL…

    • 42593 Words
    • 171 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    About Indian Army

    • 5410 Words
    • 22 Pages

    PB-1 – Rs 520020200/OBC – 02 GP - Rs 1900/General Central (01 post is Services, Group reserved for ‘C’, Ex-Ser) Non-Gazetted, Ministerial Gen – 08 SC – 01 ST – 01 OBC – 03 (02 posts are reserved for Ex-Ser) PB-1 – Rs 520020200/GP - Rs 1900/General Central Services, Group ‘C’, Non-Gazetted, Ministerial…

    • 5410 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays