Preview

Absolutism Pros And Cons

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
869 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Absolutism Pros And Cons
Pros and Cons of Absolutism

The history of Absolutism began during the seventeen century during the transition from

Feudalism to Capitalism in England and was known as “The Divine Right of Kings” England

was experiencing a complete overthrow of their monarchy and its replacement was first by a

Republic and then by a new and weakened monarchy. For England, at the end of the seventeen

century they would see the erosion of the monarch’s powers in the “Glorious Revolution”.

Absolutism was a form of government where the ruling monarchs were responsible for God and

sovereignty was embodied in the King only. Despite the attempts by the Kings in England their

idea of Absolutism didn’t hit its full power like it did when King Louis XIV of France took the

throne.

I believe I share the same opinion of the majority of people throughout this country and even

worldwide that there are more cons and weaknesses of Absolutism than there are pros and

strengths. I will start out with the cons and weaknesses. In all reality the notion that one man, a

single “leader” could have all this power invested into him with a single view on the entire

country’s personal choices, religious beliefs, lifestyle choices, culture and moral values is

beyond insane and a form of slavery if you ask me. His views are not shared with the entire

country and for a single person to be in control of them all is disturbing beyond belief.

These monarchs were recognized as France’s supreme legislators, executors, judicators and

ruler of the entire country. In other words, the judge, lawyers and jury! I would say that is a

major “con” right there! Absolutism doesn’t take into account and even refuted any historical

developments during the scientific revolution during the Enlightenment era. It also debunks

science theories, new ideas on creation,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    “With power comes great responsibility.” This quote perfectly describes the future of not just world leaders, but any leader. Power is a great chance for a good world change, but it can also be manipulated for selfish reasons. If lured to the dark side, control can be one of the most dangerous and horrifying things in the universe. Considering that, power is a negative trait, not just for the user, but also for its victims and the effects power has.…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    England’s choice of limited government had positives and negatives. In England before the bill of rights they had a monarchy. James I wrote that “for kings are not only Gods lieutenants upon earth and sit upon…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Modern capitalism’s history revolves are the freeing of land, labor and capital from the nepotistic values of traditional medieval society…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism Dbq Analysis

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During the 16th and 17th century Europe, political views on the government varied in Europe. After the Catholic Church’s downfall, absolute monarchs dominated Europe. An analysis of the documents clearly shows that mostly kings favored absolutism and have superiority over their people. On the other hand, some viewed absolutism as a power that made people inferior to the government.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In England, during the first half of the 17th century, two monarchs came to power that attempted to develop royal absolutism in that country. Both James I (James VI of Scotland) and Charles I tried to rule without consenting Parliament, but Parliament had so much control at the time that neither James nor Charles successfully decreased the role of Parliament in English government. The English had been under the combined rule of both the king and the assembly for so long that they weren't ready to give all the power of government to a single person. The merchants and land-owning nobles supported Parliament, where members could be elected and changed in necessary, rather than an absolute monarch with no restraints. In 1642, differences between…

    • 751 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism was very prominent in Europe during the 16th century. Absolutism is a basic historical term meaning monarchial power that is unaffected by other bodies of power. This can include churches, legislatures, or social elites. This was brought up from the assumption of power. This also brings in the term of the belief of the "Divine Right". This power was very strong and meant that a certain person was chosen by God to be a King, Queen, or any position in high power. Both Eastern and Western Europe were very similar and contrasted in the way they used absolutism. In the body paragraphs below, it will be explained why they are similar and differ.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Louis XIV had complete absolutism because he had the divine right to rule. He thought god single handedly chose him to rule over france.Every finance,graces of any type,ect had to go thru him and had to get his approval and so he knew everything that was going on. He also had no checks and balances…

    • 104 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries there were two forms of government. The two forms of government were democracy and absolutism. Both of these forms of government were effective in there own ways. Absolutism though was the most effective during this time. Absolutism is when the ruler has unlimited power. Many rulers had a democracy government but absolutism was more effective because the rulers had all the power and it was hard to take advantage of them rather then a democracy were many rulers can get over thrown by the people of that country.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many monarchs, particularly those of European descent, employed the flourishing absolutist philosophy during their reign in the seventeenth century. Defined as the "absolute or unlimited rule usually by one man," absolutism is virtually equivalent to the philosophy of despotism. A ruler incorporating the absolutist philosophy has complete control of his subjects and the highest authority with which to govern. With origins dating back to the Ancient Greeks, absolutism found root in some of Aristotle's theories: "Aristotle despotic government (nearly convertible with tyrannical) is that of a single ruler that rules, not for the public good but for his own." And from Roman political theory "regarding the power of the monarch, there had survived, particularly, a legacy of ideas associated with the position and prestige of a ruler which greatly strengthened the power of a dynasty.” Based on this Greek foundation in Aristotelian thought and Roman political theory, absolutism rose in other schools of philosophy as it gained prominence in the political world.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before underlining the differences in economic growth and treatment of labour between capitalism and the earlier feudal system, it is necessary to understand the meaning of capitalism and feudalism separately.…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Controlling people with power and peace are two very different things from a leadership perspective. A leader…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Absolutism Monarchy

    • 83 Words
    • 1 Page

    Absolutism never worked in england because the English Kings never ruled with absolute authority. Even during Anglo-Saxon times, the powers of the king were limited.…

    • 83 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Absolutism is the belief that there is one and only one truth. Those who espouse absolutism usually also believe that they know what this absolute truth is. Ethical norms or precepts exist independent of human experience are objective and universally applicable.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism is someone having complete power and control over something, while The Enlightenment is time where people thought more about everything and questioned things…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leadership through the ages has been typically hierarchical where one individual is at the top of the figurative pyramid, leading the rest of the collective people, but like everything else in life, this too changed with time and is still busy changing. In recent years Leadership has become more collective in nature, allowing more than just one person the power and authority to make big decisions that affects many lives. This lessens chances of corruption and subjective decision making that could potentially have a negative effect on the people not in power. The collective leading way has been adopted by many, from countries like China, Vietnam and the Soviet Union to some major corporate companies. Some countries have even introduced collective…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays