When looking at abortion as an ethical issue, the argument is usually whether the fetus has moral status or not. Pro-choice supporters believe a fetus does not have moral status until it is viable outside of the mother’s womb. Pro-life supporters believe the fetus has moral status at conception. If the fetus has moral status, then it is immoral to kill the fetus (Jones & Chaloner, 2007). Some believe when the heart beats, that signifies life. Therefore, when a fetus’ heart starts to beat at eight weeks gestation (Parker, 2007), it has life. If the fetus has life at eight weeks gestation, it should be considered to have moral status as well. Therefore, it would be immoral to have an abortion after the eighth week. With all the options available to prevent an unwanted pregnancy, there should be no need to use abortion as a form of birth control.
Various abortion procedures are available depending on how far along the pregnancy is. In the first trimester, there are four procedures available. Methotrexate and Misoprostol (MTX) is a procedure used within the first seven weeks of pregnancy. MTX is a two-part medication combination taken within five to seven days of each other and it is over 90% effective with the effectiveness rate going to 96% if done within the first seven weeks. …show more content…
If something is keeping you from your goals, then it is wrong. If it is helping with your desires and goals, it is right (Mosser, 2010). The ethical egoist would argue against the fact that abortion is wrong and say it is okay to have the abortion if it is keeping the woman from doing what she wants to do in life. An unwanted pregnancy would certainly keep a woman from her goals. Maybe she is not done with school or is not financially stable enough to raise a child. Therefore, the ethical egoist would say it is in her best interest to abort the