Preview

Abilene Paradox Critique

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2155 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Abilene Paradox Critique
Critique of The Abilene Paradox: The Management of Agreement

Biography Written by Jerry B. Harvey, The Abilene Paradox: The Management of Agreement discusses how organizations and leadership teams plan projects, events, and/or research studies and these projects can gather momentum and take on a life of their own, despite the face that no body wants to take part in them or claim responsibility for them when they fail (Understanding the Abilene, 1991). While it is difficult to find information regarding the author’s childhood, according to Wikipedia, the author, a native of Texas, is currently Professor Emeritus of Management at The George Washington University (2010). Jerry B. Harvey has served as a consultant to a wide variety of industries including industrial, government, religious, educational, and voluntary organizations, is the author of approximately fifty professional articles and two books: The Abilene Paradox and Other Mediations on Management and How Come Every Time I Get Stabbed in the Back, My Fingerprints Are on the Knife?, and is also featured in several videos focusing on organizational behavior (Wikipedia, 2010). Harvey is known for his for atypical management books. “He intentionally strays from mainstream bottom-line and worker satisfaction obsessions, drawing instead on children’s fables, mythological characters, and Biblical parables to deliver his management messages” (Sonnesyn, 1989, p. 76). According to the Susan Sonnesyn, author of Fly- Flicking Phrogs in the Organizational Pond, readers of Harvey’s work should be prepared to chuckle as Harvey “blends conventional OD wisdom, a knack for exposing organizational oxymorons, and a quirky tongue in check humor” (1989).
Critique
The Abilene Paradox begins with a personal narrative story. One hot summer afternoon in Coleman, Texas, the author, was visiting his in-laws with his wife. Although they were comfortable at home, sipping lemonade, playing dominos,



References: Choi, J., & Kim, M. (1999). The organizational application of groupthink and its limitations in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(2), 297-306. Retrieved September 18, 2010 from PsycARTICLES: doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.2.297. Lister, G. (2006). Has your board ever been to Abilene?. American School Board Journal, 193(10), 56-57 Wikipedia (2010, September, 26). Jerry B. Harvey. Retrieved September, 26, 2010 from Web site: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerry_B._Harvey

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Callaway , M. R. , & Esser, J. K. . (1984). Groupthink: effects of cohesiveness and problem-solving procedures on group decision making. Social Behavior and Personality, 12(2), 157-164.…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case Study

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pierce, J. L., & Newstrom, J. W. (2011). The manager 's bookshelf: A mosaic of contemporary views. (9th ed.). NJ: Prentice Hall…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Groupthink is everywhere. It’s in school, companies, fashion and religions places. The benefit from groupthinks in these places to share ideas and to know what everyone thinks about. People who like to sit in group for example, in school or in meeting to solve a problem or to share ideas about some homework or brainstorming, Groupthink will be the best idea for that. Not only in school or company business, but also in fashion and artistic, now many of them like…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The negative production of this type of Group Think can be confirmed through the Milgram Obedience study. This test was a series of social psychology experiments organized by psychologist Stanley Milgram that measured the willingness of participants to obey an authority figure that directed them to execute acts conflicting with their conscience. In the study, the experimenter orders the teacher (the subject of the experiment) to give painful electric shocks to a learner, who is actually an actor/tape. The teacher believes that for every wrong answer, the learner was undergoing painful electric shocks, although there were no real punishments. After a number of voltage shocks, the actor starts to pretend to be in extreme pain as he bangs on the wall that separates him from the teacher/subject.…

    • 1814 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to study.com website (2015), a groupthink can simply be defined as an occurrence that gives a group of people a fault verdict or a conclusion a that a group has made that is an ineffective decision whereby it was reached just to appease the spirit of harmony among group members than allowing individuals to act independently and creatively. As alluded on, groupthink blocks individual creativity by ignoring alternatives allowing irrational actions to tale precedence. It happens most when individuals have similar background and the group is refusing external opinions. The result are that the decisions are flawed and they often come at a cost.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bcom 230 Dq

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The term group think is a negative form of group decision-making event. It influences members in a group to base decision-making on bringing harmony to the group rather than making realistic decisions to bring forth issues to the table. As members of a group, we…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Groupthink- A phenomenon that occurs in decision making when group members avoid disagreement as they strive for consensus.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One setting in which groupthink occurs in the movie 12 Angry Men. The movie is about a jury who must reach a verdict of guilty or not guilty on a murder case. 11 out of the 12 jurors vote “guilty”, while one votes “not guilty.” The lonely juror proves his case, and slowly gains alliance. The more people that change the verdict to not guilty, an increase of stress is put on the other jurors. They all end up changing vote to not guilty in the end to gain conformity. Groupthink…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Groupthink Analysis

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Superficially the ideas promoted through groupthink often result in decisions appearing well founded and heavily supported, however the outcomes of such decisions are most frequently detrimental. Factors of cognitive dissonance are quite often evident in members of groupthink decisions, with individuals finding in reflection that they generally possessed ideas starkly contrasting the concepts which they just publically supported. Such incongruity in beliefs and decisions according to Hackman and Johnson arise when groups “put unanimous agreement above all other considerations” (Hackman Johnson 214). Personally through my participation in my local caving club, the Paha Sapa Grotto, I have witnessed and fallen victim to groupthink, the ramifications of which are still negatively effecting the grotto today.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Groupthink Examples

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I have always had a different idea of what groupthink really means, to me I thought of it as a bad idea from someone amongst a group of people that had not been voiced seemingly because the person having this thought lacks confidence or backing. More like trying to proof to your business partners that an idea of using an outdated tactic to target a young crowd is not the best idea In its own definition Wikipedia(2013) describes groupthink as a psychological phenomenon that occurs within a group of people, in which the desire for harmony or conformity in the group results in an incorrect or deviant decision- making outcome, whereas it can also be viewed as the practice of thinking or making decisions as a group…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Role Conflicts Within Groups

    • 2902 Words
    • 12 Pages

    References: Losh, S. (2011). Group behavior in organizations. San Diego: Bridgepoint Education Inc. Retrieved from http://content/ashford.edu/books/AUMGT415 Retrieved on September 14, 2012…

    • 2902 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Groupthink

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The second example of Groupthink as Irving Janus identified it is Illusions of Unanimity. In the meeting we all kept silent and in doing so gave Susan the impression that we agreed with her. This is particularly dangerous in some respects because it causes each person to suppress their feelings and to go along with the status quo. We don’t think about the cost of going along with Susan, we only worry about the here and now of arguing with her or disagreeing with her opinion. As Ben Carlson wrote “Be aware of the consequences if/when the group is wrong.” We can’t worry about the consequences if we don’t state our…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Pressure is more powerful than many people think: it influences school classes, people’s fashion, and even the workplace. Similar to other phenomenons, it can have positive and negative effects, and groupthink is an example of the latter: Groupthink can lead to faulty decision making, ignored crucial alternatives, and varied ideas left behind. Furthermore, groupthink occurs when a group is highly cohesive, and the group members share strong relationships. Fortunately, there are many ways to avoid it, two of them are bringing people from the outside and letting people know that the leader of the group isn't autocratic.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Groupthink

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Even though when we work in groups we usually strive for a harmonious and cooperative environment, this does not mean that an environment in which all members are in total agreement is desirable. The phenomenon termed groupthink describes the kind of situations in which each member of a group attempts to conform his/her opinion to what they believe to be the consensus of the group. Whereas this might be seen by some as a way of keeping the peace among group members, it is a rather negative attitude to have, as concentrating on "playing nice" usually detracts from the process of actually tackling the issues and exploring creative solutions. Thus, it becomes imperative to identify the symptoms of groupthink in order to correct it.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Groupthink: Pros And Cons

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Groupthink is a practice of making decisions within a group that values unity rather than accuracy and discourages personal responsibility. In other words, groupthink is agreeing with a group out loud, although you may not agree with the group inside your mind. There are eight different symptoms that are involved with groupthink. The symptoms include the illusion of invulnerability, rationalization, inherent morality, stereotyped views, direct pressure, self-censorship, the illusion of unanimity, and mind guards, Groupthink has benefits, but it also has downsides.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays