8th Amendment

Only available on StudyMode
  • Download(s) : 910
  • Published : October 8, 1999
Open Document
Text Preview
The Eighth Amendment
The 8th Amendment to the Constitution of the United
States prohibits cruel and unusual punishment, as well
as the setting of excessive bail or the imposition of
excessive fines. However, it has also been deemed
unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of the United
States (according to the Eighth Amendment)to inflict
physical damage on students in a school environment for
the purpose of discipline in most circumstances.
The 8th Amendment stipulates that bail shall not be
excessive. This is unclear as to whether or not there
is a constitutional right to bail, or only prohibits
excessive bail, if it is to be granted. The Supreme
Court has never directly addressed this interpretation
problem, because federal law has always guaranteed that
privilege in all non-capital cases (Compton's).
Bail furthers the presumption of innocence until
guilt is absolutely proven, beyond the shadow of a
doubt. If it weren't for bail, the accused suspect
would virtually be serving a sentence for a crime he or
she has not been convicted of committing. Excessive
bail has the same effect. The idea behind bail is to
make sure the accused is present during the trial. If
one's bail is , in fact, excessive, the amount is set
higher than is reasonable. Logically, bail is usually
not set for an amount greater than the maximum monetary
sentence for the crime with which the defendant is being
charged.(Draper 80)
The most widely known aspect of the eighth
amendment is the fact that it prohibits cruel and
unusual punishment. The stand for "cruel and unusual"
fluctuates, because it all is dependent upon social
issues, standards, and personal beliefs. However, there
are many generalizations that remain very clear, no
matter what the situation. Cruel and unusual punishment
is perceived as punishment that causes "an unnecessary
and wanton infliction of pain". Punishments that have
been declared entirely unconstitutional without question
by the US Supreme Court include torture and loss of
citizenship. (Garraty 155) This interpretation is
demonstrated by the Supreme Court's rulings in the case
of Gregg vs. Georgia, in 1976. In this case the court
upheld the constitutionality of the death penalty,
defending statutes that guide judges and juries in the
decision to issue the death sentence. The Court did,
however, state that the mandatory use of the death
penalty would be prohibited under the Eighth Amendment
as cruel and unusual punishment. The defendant in this
case, Gregg, had been convicted on two counts of armed
robbery and two counts of murder. The jury was
instructed by the trial judge, who was following Georgia
state law, to return with either a decision of life
imprisonment or the death penalty. Justice Byron stated
in his opinion that Gregg had failed in his burden of
showing that the Georgia Supreme Court had not done all
it could to prevent discriminatory practices in the
forming of his sentence. This decision became the first
time the Court stated that "punishment of death does not
invariably violate the Constitution." (Bernstein 21)
The punishment also cannot be "grossly out of
proportion to the severity of the crime charged, nor can
it violate the convicted individual's dignity. In
Rummell vs. Estelle, it was upheld that it did not
constitute "cruel and unusual punishment" to impose a
life sentence, under a recidivist statute, upon a
defendant who had been convicted, successively, of
fraudulent use of a credit card to obtain $80 worth of
goods or services, passing a forged check in the amount
of $28.36, and obtaining $120.75 by false pretenses. We
said that "one could argue without fear of contradiction
by any decision of this Court that for crimes concededly
classified as felonies, that is, as punishable by
significant terms of imprisonment in a state
penitentiary, the length of the sentence actually
imposed is purely a matter of legislative...
tracking img