After taking the personality test I have come to the conclusion that while the test does do a decent job of describing the Big Five traits of human personality, which are Openness to Experience/Intellect, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism, it does generalize them and classify personality traits rather vaguely. Humans are so complex and can exude many different types of personalities on a daily basis. But none the less, in terms of a basic guideline to go off of, the Big Five can serve as that.
In terms of how well the test results describe my particular personality I feel that it does not describe the core of who I am, but rather a slight glimpse of my personality. There are a lot of layers to a person’s personality and it is hard to judge based on questions formulated by strong disagree to strongly agree. The test results revealed that I relatively open to new experiences, that I am neither organized nor disorganized, that I am extremely outgoing , social, and energetic, that I tend to consider the feelings of others, and that I tend to become anxious and nervous. All of which are personality traits that one might find out by just simply having a conversation with me. These are not traits that I did not already know about myself when describing the type of person I am.
While I do think that this is a valid personality assessment, I feel that it could go further in depth to better improve the results of the test. It only gives a small amount of insight into my personality and I think that if the question were more personal or detailed then maybe the results would be interpreted differently. An aspect in which the test might be improved could be by giving scenarios of specific situations and having the tester answer with more detail. By knowing how a person would react in certain situations it could give better insight towards that person’s true personality. Aside from this I felt that the test was general in giving a...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document