Preview

1784 General Election

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
836 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
1784 General Election
In December 1783, George III engineered the dismissal of the Fox-North Coalition, which he hated, and appointed William Pitt the Younger as Prime Minister. Pitt had very little personal support in the House of Commons and the supporters of Charles James Fox and Lord North felt that the constitution of the country had been violated. The doctrine that the government must always have a majority in the House of Commons was not yet established and Fox knew he had to be careful.

On 2 February 1784 Fox carried a motion of no confidence which declared "That it is the Opinion of this House, That the Continuance of the present Ministers in their Offices is an Obstacle to the Formation of such an Administration as may enjoy the Confidence of this House, and tend to put an End to the unfortunate Divisions and Distractions of the Country" by 223 to 204. Pitt remained in office, and government supporters ensured petitions and resolutions of borough corporations were presented to Parliament to encourage members to back Pitt, and slowly Members changed sides.

By 1 March, Fox's motion which concluded by "beseech[ing] His Majesty, that He would be graciously pleased to lay the Foundation of a strong and stable Government, by the previous Removal of His present Ministers" was carried but only by 201 to 189. A week later, a more strongly worded motion threatening the withholding of supply was also passed – but only by 191 to 190. Fox thereafter declined to push motions, as his base continued to crumble. Pitt meanwhile decided to go to the country and on 24 March, Parliament was prorogued and on the following day the Parliament first elected in 1780 was dissolved.

The election was fought very much as a national campaign around the questions of the fall of the Fox-North government and whether or not Pitt should continue in office, rather than a series of local campaigns, which was more common for 18th century British elections.

Thanks to a combination of patronage and bribes

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Even though by this decade the Monarchy did not have the feudal power it had held in the 16th century, King George III was crucial in creating Pitt’s dominance. For any government to be successful it needed the backing of the King. This had been shown by the failure of the Fox-North coalition due to the King refusing to use royal patronage during the period. Royal influence created and maintained much of Pitt’s support. In 1784 alone, the King created 119 new peerages. He tactically gave titles to men who had influence over men in the Commons. For example, he gave a peerage to the second son of the Duke of Northumberland, leading to six of the Duke’s seven loyalists becoming supporters of the new government. All this led to Pitt having an ever increasing majority in Parliament, making it easier and easier for him to carry out his plans.…

    • 2172 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pitt gained support in and outside the commons separately. Pitt’s idea was to delay an immediate election in order for him to tackle his opposition head on. He though that this demonstrate his ability to independent MPs who would then support him in the long-term. ‘Pitt was determined to face his critics in the Commons, and events showed that his judgement was sound. It needed considerable nerve and courage to defy the coalitionists in the Commons. Pitt calculated that if he could impress the House he would set in train a shift of opinion away from the opposition and towards himself. This meant that when the Election took place the morale of the opposition would already be low. He knew that many of North’s followers had been reconciled to the coalition with Fox only because it held out the prospect of a stable ministry. Now that this expectation had been…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The time for a new government came about in times of fear, many men such as William Livingston wondered “if the republic could even survive another decade” for Henry Knox made an excellent point in declaring “Our present federal government is a name, a shadow, without power, or effect”. Meantime the relationship between the states was poor and there was an uncertainty if they would even remain united what with the debts, the economic turmoil, and the slow realization that without England they had no protection from the outside world. The question on everyone’s mind was, is there anything that can be done to save their country? 55 delegates gathered in hopes of answering this question with a brilliant solution of their own.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    * Prominent Issues of the 2nd Election: (1793- 1797) Establishing a National Sovereignty Neutrality Opponents for Office…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When William Pitt came to be prime minister in 1783, Britain was in a state of serious depression after the American War, and therefore needed reform and change. Pitt recognized the countries requirements and attempted to bring about several different types of reforms to all aspects of British life. His reforms had varied success due to many different factors, such as the public opinion, the desires of members in parliament, and also the king. Some of Pitt’s reforms proved very successful in bringing Britain back in to a prosperous position after the American war, while others lacked popularity and failed. The reasons for these varied successes are vast and there are many different aspects as to why some succeeded while others failed.…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the main reasons why Charles and Parliament failed to reach a settlement was due to religion, especially with the division between the Political Presbyterians and Political Independents. The differences between the two were that Political Presbyterians favoured a negotiated peace with Charles and did not approve of the New Model Army, and were also drawn more closely to the Presbyterian Scots whereas the Political Independents were in favour of a more considerable measure of religious toleration and disliked the authoritarianism of Scottish Presbyterianism. This division throughout Parliament meant that they had failed to reach a settlement negotiating peace terms that was to be decided upon them. In July 1646, the Political Presbyterians had presented Charles with the Newcastle Propositions as their plan for settlement which consisted of severe terms such as Charles was to accept Presbyterianism for three years in England, Parliament was to have control of the militia for 20 years, and the Triennial Act was not to be abolished and to have regular parliaments. Charles rejected these terms of the Newcastle Propositions and instead offered counter-proposals suggesting that the…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Buckingham formed a very close relationship with Charles which many MP’s feared. This close relationship and the amount of power that Buckingham possessed, often led to arguments between the King and Parliament, which eventually led to the king adopting personal rule. Buckingham monopolised Patronage at court, and advancement in Office was only approved with Buckingham support. Many MP’s were suspicious of his close relationship with both Charles 1 and James 1, and despised the fact that they could only gain advancement in the career with his consent. Furthermore Buckingham had arranged the marriage of Charles and Henrietta Maria who was Catholic. Many MP’s thought Buckingham was trying to introduce Catholicism in England, which they thought would threaten the ancient liberties of the Church of England. The king’s protection of Buckingham led to Parliament being dissolved which angered many MPs. In 1626 Parliament attempted to Impeach Buckingham, however the King stopped this by dissolving Parliament which prevented them from passing the subsidies which the King needed. These show how Buckingham’s action caused disputes between the King and Parliament, which eventually led to the king adopting Personal Rule as he thought he could manage without Parliament. However…

    • 1197 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dividing a Nation The period of 1820-1840 was a very exciting time of growth in America. America was becoming more independent in its thinking and also in the way that its politics worked. There were many things that contributed to the reemergence of a two party system in the period of 1820-1840. The major political personalities were a major contributor. By using their influence on the people and their influence in the government, many men were able to help bring about the two different parties and to influence the views of each party. States rights was another major issue that helped to establish a two party system. Conflicts and disputes over the rights of the states ultimately brought about the rise of political parties by creating a division in the views of states and their people.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Of course Pitt’s early political career was very important, as it is essential to recognise that he achieved his post as Prime Minister only by cleverly and politically climbing up the political ladder. During the 1780 elections, Pitt contested the “University of Cambridge” seat, but unfortunately lost. However during the next year of 1781, Pitt entered the House of Commons, within a year of entering the House of Commons, Pitt was appointed Chancellor of the Exchequer. The Death of Lord Rockingham was also very important for Pitt’s rise to power. Many Whigs who had formed a part of the Rockingham ministry, including Charles James Fox, now refused to serve under the new Prime Minister. Pitt, however, was comfortable joining the Shelburne Government; he was appointed Chancellor of the Exchequer (making use of his mathematics education).…

    • 716 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The political participation of voters, campaigners, and elections in general changed drastically between the periods of 1815 and 1840, events such as the aftermath of the war of 1812, the age of reform, and political campaign styles were incredibly important in the changes of political participation.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William Pitt's Success

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The French Revolution had shown that this typica aristocratic behaviour could have catastrophic results, and so caused fear for the monarchy despite the heavy loyalism in Britain. The crisis showed the weakness of Pitt's position, as with the King no longer in the political equation, Pitt's grasp on his position rapidly declined. It was essential for Pitt that he held the kings support. Had the Kings sudden incapability been permanent then a regency, headed by the Prince of Wales would have gone ahead and either Fox himself, or a Foxite would have been instated in Pitt's position. It was Fox's intention to restrict the monarchys influence, as this was the easiest solution to overcome Pitt. Pitt was unable to tsand y himself as an 'independent whig,' without the general support given to Pitt for having the Kings backing, the few supporters Pitt could trust and rely on would have been unable to uphold Pitt's rational ideas. Fox's popularity with the Prince of Wales, and the Pince's dislike for Pitt wouldve meant that had the King not recovered, Pitt would not have held his position at all. Though the fact that Fox was desperate for the support of the Prince of Wales it shows that it was not possile at all to hold a position of power without…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    During the 18th Century, precisely from the years 1754 to 1776, the colonists progressively became dissatisfied with the poor treatment that they were exposed to from Britain. When the colonies finally wrote the Declaration of Independence in 1776 as a reason for rebellion, they put the accusations for all they had complications with on King George III. However, the constant injuries and confiscations were sometimes the fault of Parliament, not King George III. The colonists’ assertions that blamed him was for a large part incorrect. And although the colonists were extremely taxed and had their natural rights imposed upon, the king was not always at fault. The king may have been the head of the British government, but Parliament was the prime…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although they were working out the issues, the colonists had some democratic features that were set and working. The rule of law describes that no person is above the supreme law. Everyone must obey laws; there is no supreme leader that can do anything they want. In document 3: The Fundamental Orders of Connecticut, it states “they shall have the power to call public officials or any other person into question for any…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    <br>"Whereas several of the houses of representatives in his Majesty's colonies and plantations in America, have of late, against law, or to the general assemblies of the same, the sole and…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 1772, groups of colonists began to create Committees of Correspondence, which would lead to their own Provincial Congresses in most of the colonies. In the course of two years, the Provincial Congresses or their equivalents rejected the Parliament and effectively replaced the British ruling apparatus in the former colonies, culminating in 1774 with the coordinating First Continental Congress.[4] In response to protests in Boston over Parliament's attempts to assert authority, the British sent combat troops, dissolved local governments, and imposed direct rule by Royal officials.…

    • 1884 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays