Preview

Colonial America Dbq Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
459 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Colonial America Dbq Analysis
In colonial America, the citizens did not know exactly what they wanted for their government. The colonists knew they didn’t want their lives to be like they had been in England. They were open to ideas; they did not know what would work and what wouldn’t. The colonists knew that trial and error was the best idea at the time. The democratic and undemocratic features of colonial America were very apparent in that democracy as it was a work in progress. Although they were working out the issues, the colonists had some democratic features that were set and working. The rule of law describes that no person is above the supreme law. Everyone must obey laws; there is no supreme leader that can do anything they want. In document 3: The Fundamental Orders of Connecticut, it states “they shall have the power to call public officials or any other person into question for any …show more content…
They did not understand individual or human rights. Individual or human rights states that all people are born with some natural rights because they are human. Document 5: Plan of a Slave Ship describes what the slave ships looked like ,and how the slaves were treated. The document reads, “Slaves had no legal rights and were forbidden to read or write.” They were treated worse than animals. They were not given their human rights. They were in no way treated as a human with individual rights. During trial and error, they had a few features that were works in progress. Regular free and fair elections is an example of this. In regular free and fair elections, people get to have a voice in elections. Citizens elected representatives for their colony. During this time, it was a work in progress because the House of Burgesses was the first legislature for the colonies. This was in Virginia. The House of Burgesses led to all colonies eventually having their own

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The thirteen colonies in America began early on to develop democratic features. The democracy in colonial America was a work in progress with democratic and undemocratic features. There were undemocratic features in the way people were living. These laws were made to make this world stay at peace together.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Democracy has little to no meaning in the colonial era, but you have to understand the subtle ways this was a moment of defining terms and transformation.” (Freeman). In greater detail Joanne tells the students to think about the meaning of words, not to just read the definitions, but also to not assume about the words and how they describe the event because they could’ve meant something completely different now than what they did back then. An example of one of the many words that were brought up around the American Revolution era is democracy. The professor says that “democracy is a good thing to us now, but not back then.” Especially Alexander Hamilton, she reads a quote from him and he states democracy as chaos, a disease in fact, and being a Founder it was part of the status…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    affairs. But Britain did not enforce its power until the colonies began to become stronger.…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During Colonial America, features of democratic and undemocratic was a work in progress for democracy.…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Still, however, in 1770, the colonists were continuing to show loyalty to the king, (document C). By this time, one main question arose in the colonial mind: Which body of government, the colonial legislature, or the British Parliament, was the supreme source of authority? Although loyalty to King George III was taught in schools, colonists began to question his authority, especially after the Boston Massacre, on March 5, 1770. The incident aroused much questioning and hatred towards the British soldiers, known as 'lobster backs' who were quartered in Boston. By 1772, a Boston town meeting responded to the Quartering Act, (document D), stating their dissatisfaction with it, and that it was an unconstitutional law. America saw itself as having its own constitution, and that it was their right to disobey any laws that went against it. This type of relationship became more and more clear as time went by, however loyalty to the king remained. Then, by July of 1774, the Intolerable Acts had taken effect, closing down Boston's port to trade, and affecting the trial process in America. As a result, the Bostonians became very angry at parliament, and friction became even more intense. Thomas Jefferson responded blatantly to it, saying that Parliament had finally gone too far when it disallowed Boston to trade. He then turned to the king, as the last hope, saying that it was the king's duty to protect them, (document…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Us History Dbq

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1.) American society wasn’t that democratic during the colonial days. Although it was much more democratic than England, it still wasn’t quite there yet. The constitution wasn’t signed and agreed upon until 1787, and before the turn of the 18th century, the colonies were a big mess. Most cities had an oligarchy, meaning a religious leader was in charge, making everyone abide by their rules, although it was often less religious and more on the tyrannical side. There wasn’t much separation of church and state. The only people who could vote were members of the church in most colonies, although some colonies allowed white men who owned property to have the right of franchise. People were hung, flogged, and exiled. Indentured servants had it bad,…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Also, Plymouth founded a government whose main law was majority rule, which is also a huge concept of the voting system currently. The New England Confederation allowed for the settlers to fight off the indigenous people, allowing them to exist. In addition, the contributions from the Dominion of New England were the people first becoming angry over not being able to hold a part in their government, which created the seeds for the later fight for independence and the government we know today. The Glorious Revolution free the people from the Dominion of New England, which allowed them to then rule as they wished.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Democracy which plays a vital role in modern day politics was not present in the 17th century new England settlements. This is obvious when they chose 7 men to have control over almost all of the town affairs. In our modern minds this seems like a bizarre thing to do as it takes away many people’s freedom of choice and doesn’t comply with our understanding of good politics. On the other hand, among the members if the community, perhaps based on their previous political experiences in England, this was…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Colonial America played a major role in the way America is run today. In this particular time period, America was just beginning to be its own country. Now that America was finally free from British rule it needed a government of its own. Democracy seemed to be the best option for the new government, but it was a little hard to switch to all things democratic immediately. Democracy was a work in progress in colonial America with democratic and undemocratic features.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Additionally, in the colonies, there was a policy of states’ rights which also played a role in giving power to the people.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The colonies had united for the first time during the French and Indian War, so they already had experience fighting for a common cause. Before the revolution against Great Britain, the colonists knew who they were and what they stood for. Although Great Britain and the colonies both spoke English, each had their own vocabulary. Great Britain's was more cultured and civilized and the colonies' vocabulary was more rugged. It was this rugged vocabulary that helped the colonies shape a new identity. Sometimes words were the same in the two regions but had different interpretations. The word "constitution" to the Englishmen explained all the laws that had existed since the start of their kingdom. To the colonists this meant a document that gave the colonists different rights and powers. The different interpretations and variations of the words and vocabulary helped the colonists create their own unique…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Colonial America’s democracy was a work in progress with democratic and undemocratic features. With features like Individual and Human Rights, Equality, and Limited Government, colonial America was continuously finding new ways to govern a new society. While, some of their strategies were undemocratic and cruel, they realized and fixed it with democratic solutions. Their efforts were enormous, and created the free land of colonial America.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By the 1720s in most colonies, eligible voters were defined as white Christian males who owned land and were over the age of 21. In other colonies, only Protestants or members of a particular church could vote. All voters had to own land because colonial leaders believed that only property owners could know what was best for a colony. This automatically excludes women, slaves, and men without enough money to own land (which made up more than half of the population) from electing representatives. Since democracy is based on the idea that the majority of the people should hold power in government, this proves that the colonies were not truly democratic. The majority of the population was excluded from the election process, making democracy impossible to achieve. Moreover, it was only in two colonies, Rhode Island and Connecticut, that the actual government was elected by the people. In the other colonies, the governor was appointed by the king or by the colony’s proprietor.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There was discussion about the proper form of government in Common Sense. Paine argued that government was "a necessary evil" (p74) that "[supplied] the defect of moral virtue" (p75) in even the best circumstances. The important thing to remember was that it was necessary, but had to be tightly controlled by the people being governed. Another point was that the closer a country got to being a republic, the less need there was for a king. After all, "[i]n England, a king hath little more to do than to make war and give away places...[a] pretty business indeed!" (p86) Hereditary succession was no better. Even if a certain man was a genius at leading a country, there was no guarantee that his descendents would be any better than a "rouge or a fool." (p83) If the colonies were independent, though, they would have the chance to "begin government at the right end" (p105), properly, without a king, without hereditary succession, but with the "charter of government...formed first, and the men delegated to execute them afterward." (p105) The entire setup, from the concept to the bold words he used, was designed to get Americans thinking about their current system of government and how intolerable it was. It called for all lovers of mankind to do…

    • 625 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Importance of Voting

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As the fledgling nation began to revise its government after the Revolutionary War, the protection of democracy was of the utmost importance and became the infrastructure the new nation was built upon. Although democratic government was not a new idea, the population and size of the Confederation posed a problem for the founding fathers (Greenberg & Page, p.1). Unlike ancient Rome, which modeled direct democracy, the founding fathers instead created a representative democracy in which the people would rule through elected officials. This allowed for a democratic nation based on popular sovereignty created through competitive elections and eliminated the threat of a tyrannical government. “The election of representatives… would keep potentially tyrannical kings and aristocratic factions from power while ensuring popular consent” (Greenberg & Page, p.31). To create a truly democratic society, it was essential to ensure a government that followed the will of the people and not one that forced the people to follow it. The Declaration of Independence states, “That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed” (http://usconstitution.net/declar.html). This is achieved through the use of…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays