Preview

12 Angry Men Certainty Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
478 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
12 Angry Men Certainty Analysis
¬¬‘In 12 Angry Men, Rose shows that doubt is an easier state of mind than certainty’ Discuss.
In the play 12 Angry Men, Reginald Rose uses comparisons between the characters to show that doubt can be an easier stance, then to be certain. At the beginning Rose uses the alienation of juror 8 to depict certainty to be an easier state of mind but as the story progresses the readers are shown negative changes in attitude for the jurors that are certain therefore showing doubt is an easier state of mind in the long run. Juror 3’s certainty is quickly dismissed by the others when they see flaws in his arguments as it makes him seem foolish as he has no intention of changing his opinion.
In the beginning the author makes use of the alienation of
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men: Film Analysis
    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page

    Twelve Angry Men: Film Analysis

    Twelve angry men is a 1957 American Film that originated from a play of Reginald Rose and has been directed to a film by Sidney Lumet. The movie is not just about the outcome of the trial of a Puerto Rican youth who has been accused of murdering his father, but also shows how the beliefs and attitudes of the twelve jurors lead to his acquittal. Aside from that, this movie also shows Leadership traits that can help every individual on developing their leadership capabilities. The story started when the twelve jurors were put together in a sweltering deliberation room somewhere in America where they have been asked for their verdicts whether to put the child on chair or not. Eleven of them unanimously voted that the youth is guilty and must be…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Juror 4 In Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men
    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Juror 4 In Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men

    In the play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, Juror 4 undergoes a series of questions regarding his confidence that a young man is guilty of murder. From the beginning to the end of the play, Juror 4 gradually changes his mind about his initial vote, through the constructive discussions lead by Juror 8. Juror 4 moves from a belief that all legal witnesses are faultless to truly experiencing some sort of “reasonable doubt.” He is left with a clearer picture of the case, looking beyond his personal prejudices and biases.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Henry Fonda's Use Of Groupthink In 12 Angry Men
    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Henry Fonda's Use Of Groupthink In 12 Angry Men

    The movie 12 Angry Men depicts a typical scene today: twelve jury members meeting to discuss a case presented to them and determine guilt or innocence of a young man accused of killing his own father. Usually the jury room is a place for discussion and debate, but the evidence has swayed all but one of the jurors into voting guilty. The group in the movie is a jury of 12 men with various backgrounds and age groups. They were placed in a deliberation room where the entire move took place.…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    12 Angry Men: Overview
    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages

    12 Angry Men: Overview

    1. Each Act takes happens in the same place. The entire play takes place in the jury room of a New York City court of law in 1957 during a very hot summer afternoon. It is a large, dull, minimalistic room with three windows in the brick wall which the skyline of New York City can be seen. There is also a wash room and lavatory off the jury room. There is a large, scarred table in the centre with twelve chairs around it. There are pencils pads and an ashtray on the table. There is also a water cooler in the room with plastic cups. The dullness of the room may signify and provide a mood for the act and is evident in the interactions between the jurors. The Twelve jurors are all seemingly awkward and uneasy towards each other once they enter the room.…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men Analysis
    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Twelve Angry Men Analysis

    In the movie twelve angry man, after the twelve jurors listened to the facts in the trail, the judge gives her instructions to them. The judge told them that the man could face the death penalty if he found guilty. The 12 man gather in a stifling hot room to have a concluding about the case. They start arguing and adding their own experience, culture, and understanding of people's motives as a way of reconsidering the facts. Although all the jurors had listened to the same stated facts and they were in the same situation, each one of them interprets the facts differently. This reflects the differences in people and the different ways that we view the same things.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Flaws
    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages

    12 Angry Men Flaws

    Throughout the years of America, we had many juries during criminal trials to decide if the defendant guilty or not guilty. In the 1957 movie, 12 Angry Men shows the best representation of American jury system and how people change their minds. 12 Angry Men shows that personal feeling get in the way in their votes. The movie is about how 12 jurors decide the fate of young boy that persumed he killed his father, while during the initial vote only Juror 8 raised his hand not guilty. Then throughout the movie and script each of the 11 jurors for various reason change their votes to not guilty. The 12 jurors change their votes from guilty to not guilty through character flaws, positive personality traits, expertise on the evidence, and pattern of behavior.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Agression Analysis
    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages

    12 Angry Men Agression Analysis

    The trial takes place on the ‘hottest day of the year’. This inevitable heat sets the stage for the aggression that arises in the most of the men hence the title ‘12 Angry Men’. Aggression can be described as any form of behavior that is intended to injure someone physically or psychologically. This suggest that aggression like any other behavior is provoked by many internal as well as external factors. Heat produces an uncomfortable arousal that may facilitate aggression. This is further defined in the revised frustration- aggression hypothesis (Dobbs et.al., 1939), which states that factors like heat contribute to the building up of negative feelings that produce aggression. Aggression can also be explained in terms of internal factors. The biological factors that contribute…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Contraversy in Play Doubt
    • 754 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Contraversy in Play Doubt

    In an immoral place such as that presented in John Patrick Shanleys’ award-winning playwright Doubt, it would be unwise to assume the architect of the play would honor and comfort us with a greater and certain ending of the masterpiece. This brings us to the obvious question of what is certainty and how we can be certain of anything. According to Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, “There are various kinds of certainty. A belief is psychologically certain when the subject who has it is supremely convinced of its truth. Certainty in this sense is similar to incorrigibility, which is the property a belief has of being such that the subject is incapable of giving it up.” If we are directed and instructed by this statement, a reader cannot have a firm grasp on whether Father Flynn did in fact physically abuse the vulnerable, colored character of Donald Muller, living in 1964, surrounded by a rising discontent of the white privileged working class society (also responsible of the death of Martin Luther King Jr. that same year). However I afforded to be unwise, biased, and by my best judgment, decide (without evidence) Father Flynn did in fact harass Donald. This decision was obvious to me by three subliminal pieces of evidences awarded by the author.…

    • 754 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of 12 Angry Men
    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Analysis Of 12 Angry Men

    For fans of courtroom dramas and crime television, these court case movies all revolve around the courtroom. Unlike the orderly process of a real courtroom, the stories are filled with drama, intrigue and corruption. Getting to the truth is seldom as straightforward as it appears within these hit movies.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men and Pessimistic Views
    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Twelve Angry Men and Pessimistic Views

    Pessimism? Depending on the definition that you give to this your answer might be different ... Pessimism infers negativity of some degree. If there is "pessimism" in Rose's message (and I think there is not!), it could be seen in the uncertainty that his description of the jury room process involves - it is not perfect and open to prejudiced manipulation, poor governance and apathy, but concurrently it is also open to a positive dissent that evokes the values that any civilized society governed by democratic processes and laws strives to achieve - a balance between individual and societal justice that allows for difference and for doubt, where the pragmatist might desire expedience and a retributive justice (revenge) as against a restorative justice dependent on a burden of proof provided by the prosecution and the presumption of innocence of the accused.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Paper on "Doubt"
    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analysis Paper on "Doubt"

    In the movie Doubt, the idea of certainty versus doubt is a central theme to the story. Doubt and certainty are prominent themes due to the fact that the character of Sister Aloysius does not have enough evidence to prove that Father Flynn is guilty. However, Sister Aloysius is confident that Father Flynn is guilty even though she has no evidence. The concept of doubt is first shown at the beginning of the story at Father Flynn’s sermon. Father Flynn says at his sermon, “What do you do when you’re not sure?” and “No one knows I’ve done something wrong.” (Shanley pg 5) Shanley uses irony to show how Sister Aloysius becomes doubtful over Father Flynn because of his sermon on doubt. The sermon is important because it is the event in which Sister Aloysius starts to become skeptical of Father Flynn. This is relevant when Sister Aloysius asks Sister James, “Well, sermons come from somewhere, don’t they? Is Father Flynn in Doubt? Is he concerned that someone else is in Doubt?” (Shanley pg 14) This indicates that Sister Aloysius doubts Father Flynn’s credibility as a pastor. Sister Aloysius becomes certain that Father Flynn is abusing his right as a pastor when Sister James sees Father Flynn put Donald’s shirt back in his locker and when she smelled alcohol on Donald’s breath. Sister James sees first hand that Father Flynn might be abusing his position,…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Certainty Is Not A Bad Thing
    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Certainty Is Not A Bad Thing

    Certainty is not a bad thing because it makes a person passionate and confident. During this scene,Jurors 3 and 4 were trying to convince 8 how the defendant was guilty. Juror 8 was the only juror to vote not guilty initially. As jurors 3 and 4 were explaining how clear it was that the defendant was guilty, juror 3 stated, “They proved it in a dozen ways. Do you want me to list them?”(556)This shows how much evidence there actually is, Rose intended to do this to show certainty in the jurors. This presents the theme of certainty, because it now shows that juror 3 and 4 are certain that the defendant is guilty. Although this is not a bad thing , rose will eventually make some jurors stubborn. Later in the play, Juror 3 has now changed his verdict…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Analysis
    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages

    12 Angry Men Analysis

    In analyzing 12 Angry Men the first theory that came to mind is the Universal Theory of Leadership. The theory is defined as the belief that certain personal characteristics and skills contribute to leadership effectiveness in many situations. This shows true with Juror #8. Juror #8 was the architect who emerged as a real effective leader. The architect showed self-confidence and assertiveness. He convinced the jury that once all thought the young man was guilty to believing he was innocent due to the lack of proof and questionable assumptions. He showed himself as respectable, knowledgeable, and authentic. The architect rose question as to whether or not the circumstances could be possible by re-enacting the situation. He challenged the process completely by doing this. He was also a leader of integrity because he was loyal to rational principles, practiced what he preached, and did this regardless of the social pressure from fellow jurors’. With these characteristic traits the architect proves to be an charismatic and effective leader.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Response
    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages

    12 Angry Men Response

    English 2010 focuses on critical thinking, argumentation, persuasion, and analytical arguments. After viewing the film, 12 Angry Men, and reading Chapter 1, it is evident that the struggles of these jurors demonstrate much what the author presents in critical thinking. As the jurors arrived they were aware of the stifling heat and one open window. One juror had tickets to a baseball game that was to begin in one hour. All but one man was quite willing to move “Toward the views that seem obviously right,” (pg. 9). The boy was obviously guilty. The group agreed to talk it over for an hour as putting a boy to death is not an easy decision. They began to look at thoughts and observations and attempt to “Eliminate snap judgments” (pg. 3). One man clearly expressed prejudice against “Them”, the people who live in the slums. He said, “This kid don’t even know how to speak good English.” Another young man said he had also grown up in the slums and questioned the evidence of the stabbing. A switchblade knife is not used…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    In Twelve Angry Men Rose Shows That Doubt Is an Easier State of Mind Than Certainty
    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Twelve Angry Men Rose Shows That Doubt Is an Easier State of Mind Than Certainty

    At the conception of Twelve Angry Men, Rose exposes the audience to the devastating heat in the jury room which over looks the "New York sky line" on what is described as "the hottest day of the the year". At this stage it is revealed to the audience the apathetic nature of jury members, uninterested in the "grave responsibility" they have in deciding the fate of the "16 year old boys life" and more interested with the goal of escaping the plain, oven like jury room. With each juror being blinded by the thick glaze of heat In front of them a verdict of guilty becomes the instinctive state of mind and the room for reasonable doubt is eliminated from all but one. The author, Reginald Rose displays through juror 8 that to be doubtful when challenging a majority becomes a harder state of mind, "as it's not easy to stand alone against the ridicule of other" at this moment juror 8 initiates his campaign that we can never be certain about anything, we can only make assumptions based on the information provided.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics