Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

An Analysis of When the Wind Blows

Better Essays
1401 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
An Analysis of When the Wind Blows
Focus Questions on Related Material

Title of the text: When The Wind Blows
Composer: Raymond Briggs
Date: 1982

a) A summary of the text
When The Wind Blows is an anti-nuclear Graphic Novel depicting a retired couple through the preparations for and the aftermath of a nuclear attack on the United Kingdom. The couples’ mannerisms such as the necessity for a cup of tea stereotypically reflect their nationality. Their attitude to the war mirrors their generational experience of being brought up during the air raids of World War II; as they are unable to comprehend any enemy other than the 'Jerries ' (Germans), and have a naive confidence that the leaflets issued by the local government can protect them from the inevitable.

b) Context for the text (history, feminist movements, time period, culture, literary period etc)
When the Wind Blows reflects the fear of nuclear warfare and the average persons response to the ‘Bomb’.

c) Influences upon author
Raymond Briggs was born in London in 1934. His father, was a co-op milkman and his mother was ‘in service’ for over twenty years. The two main characters in the story; James and Hilda Bloggs are closely based on his parents. This is represented for example by Hilda’s clothes representing a uniform, a link to Briggs’s mother being ‘in service’. 1. Many texts use the dropping of the bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki as a catalyst for re-evaluation our dominant ways of thinking. To what extent does the text use the dropping of the bomb as focal point in the text and how is it portrayed? What tone is established in the text?

Although the text doesn’t use the dropping of the bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki as a catalyst for re-evaluation of our dominant ways of thinking it does use the dropping of ficticious bomb by the Russians on the United Kingdom as a vehicle to change the readers perspective on nuclear war. The text revolves around preparing for the imminent attack and the effects of the bomb on the average person. An atmosphere of isolation and the significant fear of the unknown is established in the text.

2. Explain how the content and concepts in the text demonstrate the composer’s response to the use, or potential use, of the atomic bomb and its effect on the human condition in a post-apocalyptic era.
The author has a negative view of the use of nuclear warfare; this notion is depicted in his text through the author educating people on both the effects of the bomb and the effects of being naïve about the damage the bomb can cause. This is reflected in the effects of radiation exposure that the incurred by the Bloggs.

3. Explain how the text has been shaped by the ideas and values underpinning the text. What choices has the composer made? Why? Consider; form, genre, style, setting, plot, characters, point of view, narrative/dramatic/poetic/visual devices and language.

The ideas and values underpinning the text explore the horrendously destructive effects of nuclear warfare. The story demonstrates how nuclear warfare can effect anyone. The story highlights to the reader how imperative it is to all civilization that nuclear warfare comes to an end.
• Genre: By the story being in the form of a graphic novel, the story is accessible to a broader range of people, therefore allowing numerous people to learn about the effects and dangers of nuclear warfare.
• Style/ Setting: The picturesque, storybook setting of the story and sweet language used between James and Hilda such as: ‘Ducks’ allows the reader to develop a connection to the couple and allows the effects of the bomb to be significant due to disbelief that such disaster could occur in this setting.
• Characters: Compassion, sympathy and worry are developed for James and Hilda on account of their characterisation. The simplemindedness of the pair in their naievity of the effects of the bomb coupled with their old age is endearing to the reader. The characters represent an everyman. Demonstrated by Their surname; ‘Bloggs’. Through the use of this technique the relisation that the reader to could be affected by a bomb highlights the significance of both the bomb’s effects and the need to end nuclear warfare.
• Point of view/narrative: The story is narrated in majority from the perspective of James and Hilda Bloggs. Due to them being ill-informed on the significance of the bombs effects a lot of their dialogue alludes to side-effects of the bomb occurring, without their knowledge. For instance: When blue spots appear on the Bloggs James states: “Various veins- that’s what that is. A common complaint amongst the middle-aged segment of the populace.” When evidently it is a side effect of radiation exposure. Again due to the story being from their perspective there reader develops a deeper connection with the character, promoting them to think about nuclear warfare.
• Visual devices: The use of colours in the panels of the story act as a visual cue, assisting the reader in depicting the couples moods in reaction to the bomb. For example when the couple is happy this is demonstrated by bright yellows. However when they are unwell and slowly dying; the panels change into darker greens and sickly browns. These additional visual cues allow the reader to further understand the negative effects of the bomb.
• Language: The use of Language in the story assists in establishing the characters naivety. Such as through James and Hilda using old-fashioned terms such as 'ducks ' and 'dear ' their sheltered position in society is demonstrated to the reader. This again encourages the reader to develop sympathy for the couple, therefore when they are suffering the effects of the bomb the reader is promoted to think about nuclear warfare.

4. Paradigms (identify the particular paradigms which are applicable to the text)
a) What philosophical and/or religious ideas underpin the text’s approach to the After the Bomb period?
The religious idea reflected in the text is that people turn to religion in times of need. For example towards the end of the book when James and Hilda are experiencing the physical effects of the bomb and are going to sleep, resolving that the Emergency services will arrive soon to assist them Hilda suggests to James that they pray. James’s lack of knowledge on how to ‘address God’ and what to say in his prayer demonstrates his out of practice and they don’t typically practice religion; this highlights that they are turning to god because they are in an emergency.
b) How does the text position the responder politically and/or ideologically?
In regards to ideology, the view that nuclear warfare is a negative practice that is unnecessary is presented to the reader. This view is reflected in James’s dialogue: “they kill more people then they really need to.”

C) What view of scientific developments does the text imply/explore?
The text implies that Briggs’ view is that scientific developments in regards to nuclear weapons is unnecessary, due to the massive amounts of destruction these weapons can impose. d) What economic framework underpins the text?
Dialogue in the text infers that at present the world is in a poor state economically. For example: “Its triffically wasteful of energy in the present economic climate.”

5. a) How does the text represent politics and power relationships? How does the represent the perpetuation of fear and anxiety?
The text represents the notion that common citizens don’t have a lot of say in both their future and the future of their country; that the government ‘the authorities’ make drastically significant decisions, without considering the effects they may have on their people. This notion promotes fear and anxiety as the general population have no control over their futures.

6. How is this text valued in its own right for the literary and philosophical qualities?

The text is valued for its literary and philosophical qualities as it presents the ideas, values and perspectives of Briggs’ in a subtle fashion which leaves the reader in deep thought on the concept of nuclear warfare long after completing the story.

Bibliography:

• When the Wind Blows, GROVEL.ORG.UK,http://www.grovel.org.uk/reviews/whenth01/whenth01.htm, /01/2013.
• Lisa Jeffrey, Graphic Novel Review: ‘When the Wind Blows’, Suite 101, http://suite101.com/article/graphic-novel-review-when-the-wind-blows-a210186, 29/01/2013



Bibliography: • When the Wind Blows, GROVEL.ORG.UK,http://www.grovel.org.uk/reviews/whenth01/whenth01.htm, /01/2013. • Lisa Jeffrey, Graphic Novel Review: ‘When the Wind Blows’, Suite 101, http://suite101.com/article/graphic-novel-review-when-the-wind-blows-a210186, 29/01/2013 • •

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As World War II was coming to an end during 1945, the creation of one of the most destructive weapons known to humanity occurred within the United States. This weapon, known as “the atomic bomb,” was used on the two Japanese cities: Hiroshima and Nagasaki, resulting in a death toll unprecedented by any military weapon used before and an immediate, unconditional surrender. Some historians believe President Truman decided to drop the atomic bomb in order to intimidate the Soviet Union whereas others believe it was a strictly military measure designed to force Japan’s unconditional surrender. In the Report of a Scientific Panel of nuclear physicists, some scientific colleagues believed the atomic bomb was a “purely technical demonstration” to induce surrender. Other scientists believed that the use of the atomic bomb will improve international prospects in that they are more concerned with the prevention of war than with the elimination of this special weapon (Doc G). Thus, the United States dropped the atomic bomb to both force Japan’s unconditional surrender and to intimidate the Soviet Union.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this essay I will discuss the reasons for and against whether America was right to drop the two atomic bombs. These two bombs were unloaded on Hiroshima, 6th August 1945, and attempted to hit Nagasaki, 9th August 1945. America gave the two bombs code names, the one that was dropped on Hiroshima was called ‘Little Boy’. This bomb was made of uranium. The final death toll added up to 135,000. The nuclear bomb that fell on Nagasaki was called ‘Fat Man’. This bomb was made of plutonium. The final death toll was about 70,000. This was because the bomb had missed its allocated target and instead fell into a valley.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    BREAKING NEWS- President Truman had been warned about invading Japan, and the terrific casualties they were capable off. However since they were afraid of attacking our soil, he ordered for a weapon large enough and powerful enough in hopes of bringing this all to an end. On August 6th, 1945 a five ton-bomb was dropped in the city of Hiroshima, Japan. The bombing killed 80,000 people; the city wasn’t left in great shape as well. Although the devastating outcome, we believe that this is the last of the feuding between them and us. (P.2, http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/atomic-bomb-dropped-on-hiroshima). The atomic bombs are scary, and threating to all nations. Sadly we believe this has both ended problems we have been facing, but also…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twenty years after Harry Truman ordered the dropping of the atomic bomb, scholars and citizens subscribed to the original version of the story: the President acted to avoid the invasion of Japan and lose anywhere from 200,000 to 500,000 American lives. Then in 1965, Gar Alperovitz published a the book “Atomic Diplomacy: Hiroshima and Potsdam”. He argues that the dropping of the atomic bomb “was not needed to end the war or to save lives” but was a message to the Soviet Union. Fifty years after the atomic bomb was dropped, Alperovitz said that the final answer to why the atomic bomb was dropped is “neither essential nor possible”. He also said,”What is important is whether, when the bomb was used, the President and his top advisers understood that it wa not required to avoid a long and costly invasion, as they later claimed and as most Americans still believe.” Alperovitz believes that if the bomb was not used, Japan might still have been made to surrender before the first American landing on the island of Kyushu.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “On the morning of August 6, 1945, the American B-29 Enola Gay dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. Three days later another B-29, Bock’s Car, released one over Nagasaki. Both caused enormous casualties and physical destruction.” (Maddox 1). These disastrous events have weighted upon the American conscience ever since that day in history. Even though there are some people that disagree with the dropping of the atomic bomb, President Truman’s decision was very critical because he prevented the loss of many American lives, Japanese soldiers fought with no notion of ever surrendering, and it brought an end to a bloody war.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In august of 1945, the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were a questionable decision by Harry Truman, the president of The United States of America. Throughout the years, it has been a heated debate in terms of whether the decision was morally correct and justified. Historians have analyzed and presented many arguments. In this short essay, I will attempt to expand on how historians feel about the decision by Truman to use atomic bombs. The revisionists bring into perspective and question the motivations of Harry Truman claiming he had more on his agenda than just the war. In my opinion, the decision to use atomic bombs was somewhat justified because if looked at statistically, the death toll with an invasion would have been higher and Truman…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most significant theme in John Hersey's book "Hiroshima" are the long- term effects of war, confusion about what happened, long term mental and physical scars, short term mental and physical scars, and people being killed.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Inherit the Wind is written by Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee. Bertram Cates is an evolutionist who plays a big part in the story. He and I have many similarities and differences.…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1945 began as a year of increasing tensions between countries as the war extended onto its sixth year. Military groups of the various countries involved were now beginning to seriously consider the conclusion of the war in terms of how the global ceasefire would be carried out and frankly, who would win. After the defeat of the Axis Powers in Europe, the focus had been turned towards the war in Asia and the Pacific Regions in which the Allied Forces of Great Britain, Australia and the USA were in conflict with the Axis power of Japan and her partners. Following the urge to end the war, the ‘Big Three’ made up of the three leaders of the major Allied Forces; Churchill, Stalin and Truman met for what is known as the Potsdam Conference to discuss ‘post-war world’ and as a result, the Potsdam Declaration was written giving the Japanese an opportunity to surrender or face “prompt and utter destruction”. Despite this opportunity, the Japanese chose to ignore the warning, thus, the US decided to administer the use of their newly developed nuclear weapons and drop the atomic bombs on Japan with both hope and belief that the Japanese would be forced to surrender and thus, ending the war on American terms. At the time, there was massive speculation surrounding the attack. However, the USA had entirely justifiable reasons behind the attack; therefore, they should have dropped the bombs on Japan. Firstly, Japan had been given the opportunity to surrender on peaceful terms but refused due to military being in control of the nation. Secondly, the only alternative was an invasion on Japan; however this action would not end lightly with predictions of huge casualties on the Americans’ part. Furthermore, the Japanese surrendered within a week of the dropping of the bombs proving the effectiveness of the USA’s actions.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both ‘’Hiroshima’’ and The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb’’ were interesting works to read because they discuss two different views upon World War II. However, both works correlate to each other because at the end their message is simple: war inevitably causes death. Upon reading these works, I thought to myself how World War II is taught in the simplest form during history class in middle school. I never had a professor who explicitly went into detail of the horrors of World War II, therefore taking the time out to educate myself in depth was a decision I chose to make on my own. I enjoyed reading both works because they brought insight into the opinions and experiences of others who were directly linked to the atomic bombs.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ronald Takaki's Hiroshima

    • 2131 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Although WW II ended over 50 years ago there is still much discussion as to the events which ended the War in the Pacific. The primary event which historians attribute to this end are the use of atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Although the bombing of these cities did force the Japanese to surrender, many people today ask "Was the use of the atomic bomb necessary to end the war?" and more importantly "Why was the decision to use the bomb made?" Ronald Takaki examines these questions in his book Hiroshima.…

    • 2131 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The infamous bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima is a highly controversial subject and many continue to debate about the event, over half a century after it occurred. In August of 1945, near the end of World War II, the US military dropped two atomic bombs over Japan, not only causing a mass of death and devastation, but it also induced the question- were dropping the bombs necessary and justified? Due to exaggerated statistics, and what students learn in textbooks, Americans are socialized into believing that dropping the bombs were necessary to ending the war. However, in reality, several reasons ranging from the fact that civilians outnumbered troops in the cities in which the bombs were dropped, to how Japan was willing to surrender to the US under conditions prove that to be untrue. The nuclear bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima was both unjustified and unnecessary.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Towards the end of World War II, Japan had already been weakened by the battle of coral sea, but on August 6, 1945 an American B-29 bomber dropped a first hand developed atomic bomb on the civilian and military inhabited city of Hiroshima. 70,000 people were killed instantly. Thousands were left heavily injured and sick. The United States had many different reasons to be justified to have dropped the bomb. Nevertheless, the bomb was ‘a weapon of mass description, a weapon of terror’.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are primary and secondary documents which support both sides of this very controversial issue. Throughout doing this research I have found it incredibly hard to take a one-sided approach to this essay and therefore have decided to remain neutral. I will present my conclusions of both perspectives on the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Hopefully by acknowledging the conflicting views, it will assist in further analyzing and understanding the motives responsible for the bombing.…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Some people are under the belief that Harry Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was because of the nature of the war against Japan. During this time of conflict, Americans believed that the war, itself, was a racial war and the war was also a campaign for revenge because of the attack on Pearl Harbor. In the article “Hiroshima: Why America Dropped the Bomb,” the author Marc Rothenberg…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays