Preview

What Is Tribunal?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3038 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is Tribunal?
WHAT IS TRIBUNAL ?
Tribunal is a board established under the law to adjudicate in a certain matter such as claims by an individual.
In Malaysia, there is the Tribunal for consumer claims.
The Tribunal for consumer claims is established under Part XII of the Consumer Protection Act 1999.
It is an independent body and its primary function is to hear and determine claims lodged by consumers for losses suffered in respect of any goods or services acquired.
It provides a speedy manner for the settlement of dispute between consumers and suppliers or manufacturers.
Tribunal is much like court litigation, except it is less formal and much less expensive.
Your claim can be filed under the Tribunal for consumer claims if the amount in dispute or the value of the subject-matter of the claim does not exceed RM$10,000.00.
CAN I BE REPRESENTED BY AN ADVOCATE OR SOLICITOR ?
No.
No party in this proceedings can be represented by an advocate or solicitor.
Each party must conduct its own case at a hearing.
IS IT COMPLICATED TO TAKE A CASE TO TRIBUNAL ?
Tribunal procedure is a very simplified procedure.
Nevertheless, those who are unfamiliar with the process may find it a bit complicated.
This topic will provide you with a step-by-step guide to Tribunal proceedings.

CHAPTER 3

THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ISLAMIC SOCIETY
AND THE CORRECT METHOD FOR ITS FORMATION

The message of Islam brought by the Messenger of God, Muhammad - peace be on him -was the last link in the long chain of invitations toward God by the noble Prophets. Throughout history, this message has remained the same: that human beings should recognise that their true Sustainer and Lord is One God, that they should submit to Him Alone, and that the lordship of man be eliminated. Except for a few people here and there in history, mankind as a whole has never denied the existence of God and His sovereignty over the universe; it has rather erred in comprehending the real attributes of God, or in taking

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Quiz 1

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A brief description of the steps and judgments made by each court that has heard a case is called:…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bus Law 531 Week 1

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) over the years has grown in popularity with over 90% of all cases resolved through some form of ADR. The advantages of ADR over trial include such things, as it is less formal and less intimidating. ADR has a more rapid resolution and is less expensive and is normally heard by an arbitrator or mediator. ADR enables parties to address underlying issues and interests. It permits more creative and flexible solutions. Trial by comparison is a more formal process. Traditional litigation requires that a complaint is filed in the court and the plaintiff most respond. This is followed by a pre-trial and a trial in which each party is allowed to present their case and it is settled either by jury or a judge. Trials are also a slower process and require a higher amount of time, more expensive, and as well as stress and emotional disarray. In traditional litigation businesses may get certain documents, testimony, and other evidence, which may not apply to ADR…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law/531 Adr Analysis

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The benefit of ADR, allows a legal issue to be resolved without having to spend as much money and time as a traditional means. Arbitration, collaborative law, mediation and negotiation are a few of the alternative means to resolve disputes. For the majority of the ADR process, there is no need for a judge or jury. Initially, an ADR method should be chosen, with a neutral individual in charge of facilitation. For the benefit of avoiding a public trial, a…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many of the comm’s or tribunal were never intended to be permanent but there were exceptions such as the Court of Gen Surveyors…

    • 1900 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Step 4: If parties cannot agree on a mutually acceptable name, tribunal will make an administrative appointment…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Legal

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Additionally, the National Native Title Tribunal shows the effectiveness of the government in attempting to aid the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth). It was established to mediate native title claims under the direction of the Federal Court of Australia and resolve native title issues. The National Native Title Tribunal can also act as an arbitrator and help negotiate land use agreements.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    k.bjbh

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “Tribunals’ procedures and approach to overseeing the preparation of cases and their hearing can be simpler and more informal than the courts.”…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Goods or Services

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The plaintiff, Mr Gulash, brought suit against Stylarama Inc(the defendant) for breach of an implied warranty of merchantability under the provision of Article 2 of UCC.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Social Media

    • 2155 Words
    • 9 Pages

    (B2B), in the public sphere to resolve government and citizen (G2C) disputes, and in the resolution of disputes related to intellectual property. A consumer transaction (B2C), akin to a consumer dispute, will be one where an individual,…

    • 2155 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federal Court System

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Instead, parties have to wait for the case to be closed in the District Court, and afterwards raise all the appeals at a single time.…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Trial courts and appellate courts have differences not only in their functions but also in what and who are involved in the proceedings.…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    An Appeals Process

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages

    University of Phoenix. (2011). The Appeals Process. Retrieved September 21, 2012, from CJi Interactive: http://media.pearsoncmg.com/pcp/pcp_94869_mutchnick_cj_uop/learning_modules/chapter10/10.5theappealsprocess/index.html…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Arbitration is a simplified version of a trial involving limited discovery and simplified rules of evidence. The arbitration is headed and decided by an arbitral panel. To comprise a panel, either both sides agree on one arbitrator, or each side selects one arbitrator and the two arbitrators elect the third. Arbitration hearings usually last between a few days to a week, and the panel only meets for a few hours per day. The panel then deliberates and issues a written decision, or arbitral award. Opinions are not public record. Arbitration has long been used in labor, construction, and securities…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Force Majeure Case Study

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages

    law to be applied by the arbitral tribunal to the merits of the dispute. In the absence of any such agreement, the arbitral tribunal shall apply the rules of law which it determines to be appropriate.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Judiciary of Pakistan

    • 9693 Words
    • 39 Pages

    Court n. any official tribunal (court) presided over by a judge or judges in which legal issues and claims are heard and determined. Judicial courts are created by the government through the enactment of statutes or by constitutional provisions for the purpose of enforcing the law for the public good. They are impartial forums for the resolution of controversies between parties who seek redress from a violation of a legal right. In a broader sense, the term may also refer to a legislative assembly; a deliberative body. The public has a right to attend judicial proceedings. This right ensures that the proceedings will be conducted in a fair and unbiased manner. Most courts have a multilevel structure. A few states have a two-tiered system, but the federal government and most states use a three-tiered model. All litigants have an opportunity to argue cases before a trial-level court, and subsequently to pursue the matter further through two levels of appeals courts.…

    • 9693 Words
    • 39 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics