Preview

unification of italy

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
5306 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
unification of italy
UNIFICATION OF ITALY
The unification of Italy in the 19th century was one of the most significant events in the history of the peninsula and of Europe as well. Not only did it alter the European balance of power but it also paved the way for the future. Unification was achieved through the interplay of complex factors: ideology, war, diplomacy, personalities and European politics.
There were a number of factors that created obstacles in the unification of Italy. The mountainous nature of central Italy created two distinct civilisations on either side. While North Italy was fertile, prosperous & cosmopolitan; Southern Italy was arid, with a tremendous polarisation between absentee landlords and the poverty stricken peasantry, low rate of illiteracy and a culture dominated by religion. Further Italy displayed a unique range of constitutions. It was characterised by local customs and traditions, which prevented the growth of a national culture. The numerous dialects of Italy prevented language from being a unifying factor. Thus, Derek Biels has argued that in the late 18th century and beginning of 19th century the patriotism of the people were focussed on their cities or villages and this is what came to be known as ‘campanilismo’.
Moreover, the foreign powers also had a vested interest in keeping this region divided. This was due to the fact that different regions of Italy were under the control of different leaders. For instance, south Italy was under the Spanish king; North and Lombardy under Austria and the Pope had authority over Rome. Moreover, Italy herself was fragmented into smaller principalities under different rulers and princes, who had no concept of nationality as they were interested in extending their influence outside of Italy as well. The pope’s influence over all Italian states and temporal control over Rome posed yet another barrier to Italian unification. Finally, these structural barriers to unification were accompanied by disagreement

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Italy, the Northern League’s desire for independence was based on the economic difference between the northern Po region and the southern Mezzogiorno. These differences are attributed to core-periphery processes…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Euro Study Guide

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Italian unification: Savoy- ruled Piedmont in N Italy = best hope for unification when lead by Count Camillo di Cavour prime minister to Victor Emmanuel II.…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    - Italy faces serious devolutionary forces on its mainland peninsula as well one is the growing regional disparity between north and south. The wealthier north stands in sharp contrast to the poorer south.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the period 1896 – 1915, the condition of Italy was relatively in a terrible state in many ways with various political, economic and social problems that hindered the country’s progress. Italy’s Liberal Governments during this period were generally very unsuccessful in dealing with these inherited and growing problems clearly contributing to the end of Liberalism in Italy. More so, the Liberal Government under the rule of Giolitti saw Italy progressing in some circumstances regarding the socio-economic concerns. Nonetheless, it is very comprehensible that the Liberal Governments lacked solving the problems that they faced.…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1815, Italy had just emerged from Napoleonic rule and was completely divided into nine separate states; with different rulers and different cultures. By 1848, these states had progressed towards, albeit merely to a limited extent, some kind of national unity – national unity meaning the feeling of being united and together as one country. It could be argued that the lack of success in the reception of Giuseppe Mazzini’s ideas was the most substantial reason explaining this slow progress; though some would say that it was mostly down to factors such as the power and influence of Austria, poor communication within Italy, or its weak military. Through analysing the evidence, it would appear that the main reason for the slow progress of national unity within this time frame was poor communication.…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ccot Essay

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During the 1800’s Europe went through a time where countries started wanting become united. These countries were Italy, Germany, Ottoman Empire, and Austria. The purpose for this was that Napoleon was constantly invading these countries and easily defeating them. This sparked the need and wants to become one unified country. In the case of Germany unifying their country lead to becoming one strengthened nation. In the situation of the Ottomans unification seemed to weaken and eventually destroy them. European unification proven to empower as well as weaken and destroy nations.…

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Susan Muthan1

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The debates over Italian national identity and unification in the period circa 1830-1870 were controversial. The ideas of the unification of Italy were preferential to those who wanted it to become a republic, but to others, they favored a separated monarchy of kingdoms and territories because a republic may be pernicious and consisted of mixed opinions.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The north of Italy was largely controlled by Austria, and their military prowess allowed them to greatly dominate the north and quickly stop any revolts…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin, differences such as in religion, ideals, and sometimes even reason of existence were evident between the two Renaissances. These differences were as a matter of fact evident based on the diverse roots of the two Renaissances. "The Northern Renaissance was distinct from the Italian Renaissance in its centralization of political power. While Italy was dominated by independent city-states, countries in central and western Europe began emerging as nation-states" ("Northern Renaissance"). These differences were crucial regarding the development of the Renaissance and the branches that got out of it, making the two Renaissances as much different as they were similar.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    based in Rome, losing influence over much of Northern Europe. Weakened, the various Italian city-states became vulnerable to conquest by Spain, France, and Austria. Italy remained a patchwork of principalities controlled through proxy by various European powers until the 19th century, when the French leader Napoleon supported the unification of Italy as a way of creating a buffer state against his many enemies. With the backing of France, Italian nationalist Giuseppe Garibaldi led a popular movement that took over much of Italy in 1861 and would be ending in 1870 with the fall of Rome and complete unification of the…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nationalism Dbq

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nationalism was a key factor in building nations. Throughout the years Italians were growing impatient and dissatisfied under foreign rule. Count Cavour was responsible for the brains behind the unification of Italy. He believed that releasing the Italians from foreign rule would not only leave the country authoritative and superb but also supply the people with intelligence and knowledge (Doc. 3). Italian Nationalists looked up to the Kingdom of Piedmont-Sardinia because of their power over the Italian states. In 1848, the kingdom had adopted a liberal constitution. So to the middle class liberals, unification under Piedmont Sardinia was appealing. Giuseppe Garibaldi, the leader of army of nationalists, captured Sicily. After marching across the Italian mainland their was an agreement to let the Sardinian king rule. Like Italy, Germany achieved national unity around the same time. The Austrian Empire took over the German confederation; however, Prussia was prepared to unify them. Prussia had a mainly German empire. Therefore, nationalism truly unified Prussia. When Bismarck took control, he was a master of realpolitik. Bismarck’s method for uniting Germany was through blood and iron (Doc 5). He believed that the power of Germany should be allocated over all German People. In his eyes, war was the only option to achieving success.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Only recently, Italy can be considered a homogenous country. As a matter of fact Italy, as a single country, is much younger than the United States. The unified…

    • 2228 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When Benito Mussolini concluded his violent and semi-legal seizure of power in Italy on the 29th October 1922, the Fascist era began in victory as crowds of Blackshirts rushed to the capital to celebrate their leader. The aim of this essay is to explain the Fascists’ rise to power in Italy. Thus, whilst the highly repressive nature of Fascism cannot be understated, this essay will focus solely on Italy before Mussolini seized control. Why was Italy the first European country to succumb to Fascism? What factors in her development meant that people were willing to toss aside liberal parliamentary democracy…

    • 2729 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The unification of both Germany and Italy brought great change in these countries. This process resulted in these countries to focus on for their independence, economic growth, and a strong nationalism. Also, there is another role of the unification and it is an occurrence of war, separation and controlling politics. War is a natural force which leads to unite some nations as wells as divide others. In the unification process, it is essential to have a confident and courageous leader. Bismarck was a leader in Germany while Cavour was a leader in Italy. Bismarck’s ideas were based on the pure survival. He insisted to work hard in a forceful way thought it might be brutal, to unify the Germany and therefore he was recognized as “Bloddy Iron”. The leadership of Italy was primarily based on the political issues.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Italian Unification

    • 250 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Sonya Black, Sidney Frey, Diana Zuniga The Italian Unification The Italian Unification was the political and social movement that consolidated different states of the Italian peninsula into the single state of the Kingdom of Italy in the 19th century. Young Italy is a nationalist group created to fight for unification of the separate Italian states. The two prominent figures in the unification were Giuseppe Mazzini and Giuseppe Garibaldi.…

    • 250 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics