Preview

Study Guide for Law and Justice

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2624 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Study Guide for Law and Justice
LAJ 102 MIDTERM REVIEW
Law- a written body of general rules of conduct applicable to all members of a defined community, society, or culture, which emanate from a governing authority and which are enforced by its agents by the imposition of penalties for their violations.
Culture- the totality of learned socially transmitted behaviors, ideas, values, customs, artifacts, and technology of groups of people living in a common society. It is the transmission of all sorts of information from generation to generation.
Beliefs #1- ideas that we have about how the world operates and what it is true and false.
Values #2- normative standards shared by the culture about what is good and bad, correct or incorrect, moral and immoral, and normal and deviant.
Norm’s #3- the action component of a value or a belief patterning social behavior in ways consistent with values and beliefs.
Symbols #4- concrete physical signs that “stand for” and signify abstractions that range from the mundane and specific to those that are suffused with meaning and can evoke the deepest of feelings.
Technology #5- the totality of the knowledge and techniques people employ to create the material objects of their sustenance and comfort.
Risk Society- a society “increasingly preoccupied” by the future & also with safety which generates the notion of risk.
Mores- more formal with serious implications for violations.
Folkways- less formal with lower implications for violations.
Natural Law- a system of law that is determined by nature, and thus universal. Used to analyze human nature both social and personal- and deduce binding rules of moral behavior from it.
Positive Law- used to describe man-made laws which oblige or specify an action. It also describes the establishment of specific rights for an individual or group.
Legal Positivism- is the thesis that the existence and content of law on social facts and not on its merits.
The code of Hammurabi- the oldest known written code of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Law Quiz

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Law is a body of enforceable rules governing relationships among individuals and between individuals and their society.…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Final Exam Study guide

    • 2001 Words
    • 9 Pages

    -A philosophy that views the law solely as a human creation rather than as an attempt to discover, confirm, or enforce higher moral standards.…

    • 2001 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Osha

    • 2407 Words
    • 10 Pages

    A. A law is defined as a rule of conduct or action prescribed or formally recognized as binding or enforced by a controlling authority.…

    • 2407 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Organizational Theory

    • 1547 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Norms are known as the common beliefs of a require character for all role incumbents of a system or subsystem" (Katz and Kahn p. 43) and Values are more generalized ideological justifications for norms, and express the aspirations that allegedly inform the required activities" (Katz and Kahn p. 43).…

    • 1547 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Values and norms are internal and external criteria for evaluation (Hechter and Horne, 2003), individuals use them to judge which actions are good or bad, appropriate or not and hence regulate behaviour. Therefore it could be assumed that if people share the same values and norms they act in a predictable and cooperative manner which leads to the establishment of social order. The processes that could be responsible for the development of these phenomena will be discussed below.…

    • 1983 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethics virtual

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages

    LAW: Body of rules of conduct bind by legal force and effect, prescribe, recognized and enforced by controlled authority.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    * They are ideals and beliefs shared by members of a culture about what is good or bad, desirable or undesirable.…

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The End

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Nature law is said to be from a higher being (God) and deals with things that morally wrong. Man-made laws are made by man does not have to be morally wrong like a parking in a no parking zone.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Law is the body of rules made by government that can be enforced by the courts or by other government agencies…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Austin vs Hart

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Legal positivism is the thesis that the existence and content of law depends on social facts and not on its merits. The English jurist John Austin (1790-1859) formulated it thus: “The existence of law is one thing; its merit and demerit another. Whether it be or be not is one enquiry; whether it be or be not conformable to an assumed standard, is a different enquiry.” (1832, p. 157) The positivist thesis does not say that law's merits are unintelligible, unimportant, or peripheral to the philosophy of law. It says that they do not determine whether laws or legal systems exist. Whether a society has a legal system depends on the presence of certain structures of governance, not on the extent to which it satisfies ideals of justice, democracy, or the rule of law. What laws are in force in that system depends on what social standards its officials recognize as authoritative; for example, legislative enactments, judicial decisions, or social customs. The fact that a policy would be just, wise, efficient, or prudent is never sufficient reason for thinking that it is actually the law, and the fact that it is unjust, unwise, inefficient or imprudent is never sufficient reason for doubting it. According to positivism, law is a matter of what has been posited (ordered, decided, practiced, tolerated, etc.); as we might say in a more modern idiom, positivism is the view that law is a social construction. Austin thought the thesis “simple and glaring.” While it is probably the dominant view among analytically inclined philosophers of law, it is also the subject of competing interpretations together with persistent criticisms and…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Law is invariably constructed as a response to conflict or, specifically, to a given social problem; it is a mechanism that attempts to control certain kinds of activities or behaviours” (Boyd, 2007, p.45). Every citizen in our society is affected by the law in one shape or the other. As such, this paper will examine that as students and analysts of law’s evolution we should accept both natural law and positivism. Consequently, this essay will gauge the strengths and weaknesses of this claim. Indeed, this is paramount as our beliefs and values in relation to law define us as citizens within our given society, they are shaped and influenced by economics, morals and politics (Boyd, 2007, p.5). Subsequently, this essay will examine natural law to determine its strengths and weaknesses and then juxtapose positivism’s strengths and weaknesses by using the same examples in both perspectives to produce a clear and coherent examination of natural law and positivism to analysis the pros and cons regarding both perspectives. This paper is by no means an in depth examination of natural law and positivism due to time and space, but a brief synopsis of the strengths and weaknesses of embracing both natural law and positivism.…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    What Law Is

    • 1736 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It is possible to capture what law is from a standpoint independent of its content by positing a descriptive account of its characteristic features. In response to the limitations of early empirical positivism propounding the command theory, the conventional positivists put forth the separability thesis, by which law can be described distinct from any morally laden propositions. However, the value of such a purely descriptive account of what law is remains fundamentally limited. In contrast, natural law theory emphasizes the link between law and morality. Although relevant, this is not pertinent to capturing what law is. Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law attempts to provide a middle ground through elucidating the hierarchical structure of law and its validity as derived from the Basic Norm of the historically first constitution. While the form of law can be captured in a value free manner, it is inherently normative and a meaningful standpoint of what law is requires considering what law is for and what law should be.…

    • 1736 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal Positivism

    • 877 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There are a lot of theorists who pioneered in the concept of Legal Positivism.But among them are two leading theorists who mainly contributed on this idea and further argued on each other’s respective opposite views. One of which is John Austin, who holds that legal positivism is the nature of law which deals with the existence and contents of law based on social facts and not on its merits. He also established the command theory of law which maintains that all laws are but commands. Another positivist in the name of H.L.A Hart, who seems to be in contradiction of Austin’s concept of Legal Positivism, included in one of his writings entitled The Concept of Law argues that there is no logical necessary connection between law and coercion, or between law and morality.…

    • 877 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Components of Culture

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    • Not understanding the symbols of a culture leaves a person feeling lost and isolated…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to positivism, there is nothing intrinsically moral about the law. A law enacted by a legislature can be evil and immoral; there is no fundamental connection between the two. Whether what they did was right or wrong is not a matter for a judge. A judge is educated and skilled to discern legality from morality. According to John Austin, legal positivism is the actual continuation and content of the law depending on its social criteria and not its merits. The law is a matter of what has been ordered or decided. It’s referred to as a social construction. Legal Positivists believe that: (1). there is no necessary connection between the law and morality. They do acknowledge that moral norms and standards exist however, the law overpowers morality. (2). Argue that the only valid law is the written law and that those laws are correctly passed by parliament. Judges have no right to impose laws as they are not elected in office to do so. The law has to be written down so we know the standards to be held. (3). the content of the law does not depend on its merits, it is valid irrespective of it being good or bad law. Legal Positivists are only interested in its existence.…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays