Preview

History Notes

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1162 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
History Notes
March 26th 2013
Homework:
Questions Chapter 12 (1, 2, 3, 9 and 10)
1. How did reform affect each of the three estates?

The reform affected each and every state because it made them equal in rights. It ended the labour and taxes due to the church from the peasants – They became free persons and the privileges of the nobility were ended. This was all because they wrote the constitution which abolished feudalism.
2. How could the perceived success of violent action, such as the fall of the Bastille, result in more violence by the mob?
It shows that with violence, they get what they want. They were rioting and committing this act for the reasons of the unjust class system known as the three estates. Not only were the mob backed as well by women and most of the third estate but they became aware of something that could be very much of use, knowing how to make the King cower. People had a suspicion of Louis 8th being a woos and this did not at all work in his favor. This could give the mob ideas of how much of a fear they are or how much of a force they could become and what the potential results could be from overthrowing an authoritative power even.

3. Explain why the Constitution of 1791 included a veto for the king?

I do not entirely know why the veto was included but most likely it was included to be a power he could use in the case or scenario where he may be in a jeopardized situation and possibly near the end of his rule, the idea that there could be a law about to be put into place that he may not deem fit and requires time to asses things before the complete clearance of the legislation, or the veto was included for the king for his ability to delay law if there was a matter to do with the people and their rights, he could void the rights in the possible accordance of the law.

9. What do you think was the legacy of the Revolution” Was it a success? Justify your opinion

The legacy of the Revolution: a reminder of something that was

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Restate the question in the response; answer each question with 1 – 3 complete sentences. Refer to your textbook for help.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    William Doyle writes in his book that the reason of the revolution being violent is resistance. The understanding of resistance could go two ways. There was the resistance of the king, Louis XVI, where he thought that he should be the absolute monarch and where he believes that he is the one to be ruling over France and no one else. On the other hand, there also was the resistance of the common people that had enough of the king’s and queen’s poor ruling over them. They wanted a change.…

    • 1610 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This revolutionary event in history is most noted for the execution of thousands of citizens under the influence of other rebellious acts that grew popularity at the time. Famously, Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette were included under the list as these were important figures that were deeply involved in French revolutions. Despite this tragedy, this event is often times considered a momentous occasion in French history as it exemplifies the claim that this became the turning point for the outspoken France citizens. In order to acknowledge components of the French Revolution, it is essential to recognize the involvements of previous revolutionary acts, main causes, significant outcomes, recovery or possible solutions, and impacts on modern society.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reign Of Terror Dbq

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Reign Of Terror was an unjustified part of the French Revolution. These hateful and vengeful acts led to an outburst of fear amongst the french people. What once started as a start to a new government led to an unexpected ruling of Maximilien Robespierre. Robespierre was the leader of the Public Safety Committee, and the reason king Louis XVI and many others were executed. He wanted to lead the french people to victory during this revolution, but the power corrupted him. Thus leading to the reign of terror and later his own death by the people.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under the rules of 17th century siege warfare the New Model Army were allowed to kill the townspeople, however this right was rarely if ever exercised. The attitude was that revenge could be taken upon a town that took so much effort to besiege. Even during many of the brutal wars in Europe at the time much of the violence, such as those that took place during the French Wars of Religion were in fact conducted by angry mobs. This piece of parliamentary brutality was different and was much more reflective of the state organized violence that followed the French Revolution 140 years later. The only civilian account we have was written by Dean Barnard, a Royalist and Protestant cleric tells is that people were slaughtered in their own homes. This style of violence was conducted by an army directed by a parliament that was willing to hold on to power at all costs.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Revolutions of 1848 were the measures that the people believe they had to take in order to achieve what they wanted. The people had nothing to lose but the bondages that held them back from earning that prize of freedom (#1). When the revolutions were successful, the people rejoiced and were once again united. Even students were excited to hear that there will be a new republic. The people were happy to know that there was a new form of government, new order and authority, and did not have to worry about another forming of a monarchy. Finally the people could share the symbols of equality, liberty, and fraternity. (# 3, 6, and 9)…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judging by how the filmmakers oriented the visuals throughout the movie, it was clear that they depicted the French as having some sort of counterinsurgency tactic such as torture that might have won them the Battle of Algiers, but it unexpectedly backfired on them causing the French to be unable to maintain their control over Algeria . Pontecorvo’s film focused on the anti-imperialistic resistance that occurred during the Algerian Revolution. The Battle of Algiers wanted to portray the struggle that the National Liberation Front or the FLN had to endure during their fight for independence and free the people from their oppression. A goal for the film was to present the FLN as freedom fighters that resorted to terroristic attacks as a last resort in order to combat the French colonizers. As preparation for the masses and to get them ready for the struggle the French, the FLN began a program to that would start to eat away at the French. They began clear the out the accumulation of drugs and prostitution, that the French had encouraged and tolerated. Following this campaign, the FLN also resorted to assassinating French police officers that they found roaming the streets If they were going to take back their city they were going to need to start somewhere and taking out the local authority was going to get their attention that this was a real resistance. However, not much animosity was aimed towards the French citizens. As a countermeasure, the French placed bombs in the Casbah, indiscriminately taking with them Algerian families that were sleeping. This in turn anger the FLN and in retaliation sent three women dressed in European clothing to three separate locations that were frequented by young people. Another retaliation was enacted by the…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    By the late 1440s, national anger at the loss of the empire in France fused with growing discontent over internal abuses within the country. Ross [25] describes this scene, “For most Englishmen the chief social evil of the day was the ability of powerful men to defy the law, to bend or pervert the course of justice and to use violence in pursuit of their own interests or those of their followers. Records of the time abound with murders, beatings, destruction of manor houses, and the carrying away of livestock, performed by large gangs of men.”…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One reason the Spanish conquistadors were able to conquer the Aztec and Inca Empire rapidly is that…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite the small impact of this law, the petits blancs tried to refuse the gens de coleur their rights. In response, the gens de coleur staged armed demonstrations. The leaders of this demonstration were executed by the colonial government, which ultimately led to a series of class and racial…

    • 1947 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tocqueville was able to sense the February Revolution of 1848 beginning by the way the people were acting: he writes, “as soon as I had set foot in the street I could for the first time scent revolution in the air: the middle of the street was empty; the shops were not open; there were no carriages, or people walking; one heard none of the vendors’ cries; little frightened groups of neighbors talked by the doors in lowered voices; anxiety or anger disfigured every face” (Tocqueville 36). It was quiet, too quiet, and the atmosphere was too tense. The nearly silent streets of Paris became a representation of the Parisians’ apprehension. When Tocqueville was walking through the streets and saw the barricades, fallen trees, and the other acts of destruction, he found himself “saying what had long been on the tip of [his] tongue: ‘Believe me this time it is not another riot, but a revolution.’” (Tocqueville 38). The manner in which the Parisians had transformed the city physically in addition to the incorporeal manner made it doubly obvious what was happening even though it was not quite like the last revolution that had occurred. Tocqueville comments on this, saying, “Nowhere did I see the seething unrest I had witnessed in 1830, when the whole city reminded me of one vast, boiling cauldron. This time it was not a matter of overthrowing the government, but simply of letting it fall”, implying this revolution did not require much effort and therefore there was no need for all the energetic shouting and violence that had happened in 1830 (Tocqueville 39). This time, the Parisians had transformed Paris into a quiet, but tense entity rather than one raging in civil…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nationalism has the ability to drive groups of people to use force when needed to protect it. In the first source, a Paris mob of about a thousand people are breaking into the Bastille to get weapons to protect the National Assembly. They are doing this because they were incited by news that the king had ordered troops to break up the Assembly. By protecting the Assembly, the French people were essentially protecting their voice from being dismissed in the decision making of their country. This voice would aid them in bringing about change within the nation, which the people in the Third Estate saw that they needed.…

    • 108 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    History HL Paper 3 Europe

    • 6124 Words
    • 22 Pages

    system and as a cause of the revolution, as well as of the actions of Louis. It could be relevant to…

    • 6124 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Disturbance, anarchy, disorder in france for long time. Reign of terror shook france and many innocent people were guillotined.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The date of the event (4 September, 1557) is significant in understanding how and why a collective of discontented Catholic clergy and citizens assaulted French Protestants due to two important factors preceding the event which exemplifies the period of unrest in Paris: the Edict of Compiegne (July); and the Battle of Saint-Quentin (August). The Edict of Compiegne issued just over a month prior to the Saint-Jacques event on 24 July 1557 by the French Catholic monarch Henry II stipulated that punishments for ‘heresy’ were to be meted out with increased severity , thus, continuing the pursuit of all suspected Protestant conspirators against the kingdom. Consequently, the content of the edict and its close-proximity to the night of 4 September explains one reason why a violent pursuit of Huguenots took…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays