Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Fall of Rome

Good Essays
859 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Fall of Rome
There were many issues that brought about the fall of Rome, but they are primarily considered to be political, military and economic.

-------------------------Political Problems--------------------------------…

1. The senate became extremely corrupt and political instability came into existance. Consuls and officials would offer positions in office for those who could pay a lump sum of denarii (currency). Furthermore, they accepted bribes in exchange for favours of a wide assortment. A series of very incompetent, rather crazy Emperors were elected and the Plebians suffered as a result. Civil revolts sprung up, lead by rebellious citizens.

2. Emperor Constantine divided the empire into two halves. He declared Constantinople the new capital of Roman society, claiming rule over all Eastern provinces. The Western Roman Empire lost its power over towns in the East, causing a great reduction in profits from the treasury and weakening them dramatically in warfare. Now their strength had been dwindled.

-----------------------------Military Problems------------------------

1. By 300 AD the majority of the Roman army was comprised of barbarian trained soldiers- much less effective than the superior infantry that Rome had in previous centuries. This made the battles against enemies very difficult, Rome no longer had a firm grip or control over military situations.

2. Well at least Rome still had new recruits enlisting....Not! Another problem was that many of the Roman citizens who were expected to enlist in the legions refused and sneakily signed their slaves in their position. As you can imagine, the new forces were very sluggish, had low morale, didn't fight with courage and really, they couldn't care less about the development of Rome, after all they were servants to them!

3. Ok, Rome's been run down a lot in warfare.. but we can still rely on the older, more experienced troops to back us up, right? Unfortunately for the Romans, many of the men who had gallantly served their nation years ago had retired to estates or farms and simply did not want to be bothered with government affairs.

4. In remote locations under lenient Roman governing, it was common for soldiers to marry and adopt local customs, attitudes, values and beliefs, instead of keeping their original Italian heritage. This caused disloyalty, hesitation and disillusion worldwide among legions facing the same problems. Southern Britain is a great example. Oak tablets found by archaeologists show how most of the Roman army deserted or refused to carry out orders when fighting Pictish tribes in Scotland. They didn't want to destroy the culture they had integrated with. When Emperor Trajan requested the remaining men to campaign in Dacia, no one was eager to participate. This was a big issue because it accounts for a decline in moral obligations.

5. Barbaric hordes of fearsome warriors gathered in the North/East of Europe in large groups, slowly gaining huge influence (Vandals, Goths, Huns). After Emperor Trajan's death in 117 AD, Hadrian took his place and adopted a defensive stance. He realised that Rome was no longer in the position to continue their expansion, and so he ordered the construction of thick stone walls bordering Roman land. The legionaries could barely hold their ground, having to defend such a wide, vast area. In fact, it was literally impossible to do so, as constant waves of barbarians aimed to break down the fortifications. Again, England is a good instance. Rome paid the Pictish tribes large sums of tribute so that they didn't attack. It was however, inevitable, and these nomadic tribes would soon occupy dominions within the Roman Empire, slowly breaking down the money within coffers and Roman authority itself.

----------------------Economic Problems--------------------------------

1. Rome depended on its empire for funds, (farming practices and mining) it became very poor and had trouble coping economically. Rome had nothing to trade, and couldn't rebuild itself. In any war you need money to be victorious. Soon enough, other cities within the Empire stopped sending funds to Rome.

2. During certain Imperators regimes, they debased the currency. This meant that a coin didn't have a default value. Instead, it was represented by the amount of silver it contained. When Emperor Claudius was in power, coinage wasn't even made up of 1% actual silver. As a result, severe inflation occured.

3. High taxes was another issue which wasn't resolved easily. It caused distress and anxiousness among many classes in Ancient Rome.

4. Disease most likely had a massive impact. Malaria and other plagues became regular occurences, killing up to 20% of Rome's population in 150 years. This meant significantly reduced numbers when it came to running all aspects of society, such as education, warfare training and the economy.

------------------The Official end to Rome's rule-----------------------

1. The deciding factor. All this pressure was to much for Rome to handle, it had struggled endlessly with immense problems for hundreds of years. Alaric, leader of the Visigoths sacks Rome in 410 AD. Later, Rome is spared from being pillaged again - Attila the hun, another barbaric warlord decides to retire his reign in 452 AD but destroys many cities in Italy. 3 years after Rome is looted by Geiseric, King of the Vandals. So Rome endured a lot of economic damage and infrastructure demolishment

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    APWH Rome and China Notes

    • 1379 Words
    • 5 Pages

    d The roman army started recruiting people and pay them for their service. This is when the Roman army shifts from a citizenship army to a Professional army. This change = very important. The USA is now a professional army too and we also have a wealth gap. We are the modern day Rome.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How Did Rome Fell Dbq

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rome had made advancements: roads made of rocks, arches, and aqueducts. They were huge accomplishments that improved the quality of life. As word spread about their advancements, Rome became a beacon for invaders. While Rome possessed an extremely strong army, the city was weakened by the greedy rulers who controlled the political system. Without strong leadership the Roman army was no match for invading barbarian forces.…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fall Of Rome DBQ Essay

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I observed from document A that there were 13 assassinations during the 50-year period of 235 CE to 285 CE. This statistic shows that many civilians were hungry for the throne. Therefore, they assassinated the emperors, and that resulted with many emperors in one period of time. Like a wobbling chair unstable because of too many people leaning on it, Rome fell from an overwhelming amount of emperors. Another piece of supporting evidence comes from document B, “Hosts of senators, bureaucrats, and clergymen were entitled to avoid the draft.” This quote from the excerpt suggests that the nobles were corrupt. If there are not a lot of soldiers, then shouldn't everyone be required to join the army? Also, a quote from document E reads,“a wealthy lawbreaker is not punished for his injustice…”. This shows that the bottom line to success in Rome was being wealthy, and just for being wealthy, you are automatically free from all charges. This evidently suggests that the government was…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Spartacus Film Analysis

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    First lets talk about the Roman army and how it was structured and organized. The Roman army was divided up into legions; with the soldiers being know as legionaries. Each legion was made up of 10 cohorts, with a normal cohort contained 480 soldiers. The first cohort in every legion was larger than the other coherts, which was made up of…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, the fall of Rome should be thanked to weak militaries and unpredictable occurrences in nature. To recall, natural disasters had no warning signs, killing thousands of unknowing people, and reducing resources. In addition to an arrogant army that soon grew lazy, leading to loss of land, and spirit. From the start of Rome to its end, over a million people were killed because of these issues. No people means no…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Romans were great diplomats. They were firm when necessary and smart about granting citizenship. They also let citizens participate in domestic affairs. Their military was made up of strong, persistent soldiers. If a substantial amount of men were lost in battle they wouldn’t just surrender, but instead recruit new soldiers. They would build up new armies so that they could keep fighting. The Romans were also good strategists. By the year 264 BCE Rome had established colonies in strategic spots throughout Italy. By connecting these settlements with roads, they built a military and communication network that helped them rule more effectively. By getting military help from allies, they mobilized Italy’s military…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fall Of Rome Dbq Essay

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One reason why western Rome collapsed is because of the military as seen in documents 1 and 4. These documents show that Rome’s military was weak, drafted more people, had loyalty problems, and hired mercenaries. First, the lack of breastplates and helmets(document 1) made the Roman…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome before 264BC

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Roman army before 264BC was a citizens’ army, comprised of farmers and the population, with very little to no full time soldiers. Every man was expected to provide his own gear, and as such it was very difficult to recruit the poor or slaves to fight, and when they were recruited, it was at the expense of the state. Another problem with a citizens’ army is that they are not full time soldiers, and many are often inexperienced in combat, and lacked the training necessary to be truly superior to any opponent.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roman Empire DBQ

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page

    To begin with, military weakness was a big factor in the fall of Rome. According to Document B, “...armor began to seem heavy since the soldiers rarely ever wore it.” This shows that the soldiers were very lethargic and couldn’t protect the empire effectively. They stopped doing their ground drills and never wore the breastplates. When war came to Rome they weren’t prepared to wear the armor, so instead they fought with…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the third century C.E., Rome faced many problems and was weakened by barbaric invasions from 100-500 C.E. Around 476 C.E, most of the Eastern Roman Empire was still intact, but the Western Roman Empire was covered by barbarians. External enemies, such as the Saxons, Vandals, and Ostrogoths engaged with Rome, which enabled the empire to wear out slowly. On the other hand, this powerful empire was not only weakened by external rivals but by internal decay as well. The increase of enemies contributed to the problematic issue of recruiting soldiers. Rome had difficulty recruiting male boys from Rome into their military, which resulted in the government to promptly pay German foreigners to join the army. Low funding from citizens did not give the military supplies or resources they needed to protect Rome. Consequently, citizens rarely paid for the army, even though Rome kept on paying German foreigners for their army. This caused a major conflict. Lastly, many foolish decisions made by the emperors and government caused the aspects of the military to slowly…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman Empire was one of the most advanced and largest civilizations with their amazing architecture, astonishing inventions and many more. But Nothing can last forever. The fall of the roman empire was caused by four main reasons. Political issues or an unstable government, Economic problems, Diseases could have played a part and lastly, foreign invaders.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One of the main reasons Rome fell was because of military weaknesses. The military was weak because of the army’s laziness. The excerpt from the ancient book ‘Concerning Military Matters’ by the historian Vegetius, states “Parade ground drills were abandoned, the customary armor began to seem heavy since the soldiers rarely ever wore it...So our soldiers fought the Goths without any protection for chest ad head and were often beaten by archers.” Since the army was too weak to wear the armor,…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Did you know that Rome was one of the biggest empires of all time? By the 5th century AD, Rome was starting to fall. An empire can fall by having a bad economy, military, and/or government. These were the reasons that Rome fell. The most important reason, however, was the military.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were many factors that led to the decline of both the Roman and the…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fall Of Rome Dbq

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A colossal factor that contributed to the fall of Rome is political instability and political corruption. Holding a political office in ancient Rome was said to pay very well. Politicians were not only running for government positions for power reasons, but also for money purposes. This skewed the validity of government leaders, often leading to officials focusing on themselves and their wealth and title, instead of what is best for the people of Rome. The validity of government leaders can be related back to present day America. Government officials now are not always qualified for their job. Instead, one might say they are running for their own gain, or to achieve a certain title, not really caring about the good of America.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics