Preview

Business Law Chapter 3 and 4 Outline

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1076 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Business Law Chapter 3 and 4 Outline
Chapter 3 & 4 Outline:

Chapter 3: Jurisdiction
Chapter 4: Alternative Dispute Resolution

Chapter 3: Jurisdiction

Equal Protection
14th Amendment of US Constitution
Nor deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws

2009 Iowa Supreme Court Case
Matter of equal protection under the law
Check & Balances of 3 branches of government
Judiciary checking legislative’s power
ISSUE: State statues definition of “marriage” -limiting it to man & woman. Unconstitutional as it bars equal protection
PROCEDURAL HISTORY: Plaintiff filed motion for summary judgment and district court affirmed, finding state statue unconstitutional. Defendant appealed

Equal Protection…, (cont’d from above)
The law must treat equally all similarly situated people.
Heterosexuals and homosexuals - “similarly situated?” = committed, loving relationships
Rational basis test: - plaintiff has the burden to prove that it is unconstitutional
Defendant’s “rational basis”: Man - woman marriage definition is constitutional & best for society because:
Provides stable child-rearing
Conserves states resources - state taxing returns
Promotes concept/integrity of traditional nation of marriage
Plaintiff’s rebuttal:
Same-sex couples provide stable child-rearing
Many married heterosexuals file separate tax returns…so state will not be “robbed”
Cannot use religion to justify law
Protect free exercise of religion
**Supreme Court affirmed lower courts holding that this is unconstitutional. Defendants can still appeal from state to supreme court.

Jurisdiction
A courts power and authority over a matter
Two types required before court can hear case:
Personal (power over the people/property)
Subject matter (power over dispute)
“Personal jurisdiction”
Power over person
Obtained through personal service of summons upon him/her while in state where lawsuit is commenced.
Substituted service for corporations
Registered agent; International Shoe

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Business Law Ch11-15

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Dorris Reed, the plaintiff, purchased a home from Robert King. Robert King and his real estate agent did not tell Dorris Reed that a woman and her four children were murdered 10 years ago, because the murder would affect the value of the home. Dorris Reed, however, did find out about the murder from a neighbor and sued Robert King and his real estate agent for rescission and damages. Dorris Reed paid $76,000 for the home but the value of the house, once the murder was taken into consideration, was only worth $65,000. Due to Dorris Reed failing to state a cause of action, the trial court sided with Robert King and his real estate agent. Dorris Reed appealed. Fraud is being looked at in the case of Reed vs. King. There are five elements to proving fraud, 1) material misrepresentation, 2) facts/knowledge, 3) intent, 4) reliance, and 5) damage (quoted from text book). Robert King and his real estate agent hid the first and second element of fraud. They knew about the murders and did not present Dorris Reed with this information, which would have affected Dorris Reed decision to buy the house. However, when dealing with the selling of real property, the question of materially is the main issue. Materiality is based on three conditions, 1) the gravity of the harm inflicted by nondisclosure, 2) the fairness of imposing a duty of discovery on the buyer as an alternative to compelling disclosure, and 3) the impact on the stability of contracts if rescission is permitted (citation from text book). Even though murder is horrible and it would affect a person’s judgment on buying that particulate house, there is no evidence to support Dorris Reed claim that the murder would in fact affect the market value of the house. The judgment was later reversed because Dorris Reed was able to present enough evidence to show that history can affect the value of property.…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: Groups of the same sex couples sued their relevant state agencies in Ohio, Kentucky, Michigan, and Tennessee to challenge the constitutionality of those states bans on the same sex marriage or refusal to recognize legal same sex marriages that occurred in jurisdiction that provide for such marriages. James Obergefell (plaintiffs) in each case argued that the states statutes violated Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause of the fourteenth Amendment, and one group of plaintiffs also brought claims under the Civil Rights act. In all the cases, the trial court found in favor of the plaintiffs. The U.S Courts of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reverse and held that the states bans on same sex marriage and refusal to recognize marriages performed in other states did not violated the couples fourteenth amendment rights to equal protection and due process.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Law Chapter 5 6

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages

    No, Emerson is not liable. Emerson clearly stated that children should be kept away. In the owner’s…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    BRANDENBURG brief

    • 331 Words
    • 1 Page

    The appellant was convicted by the Ohio criminal syndicalism for statue Ohio Rev. Code Ann. 2923.13. The appellant challenged the constitutionalism of his conviction in intermediate appellate court of Ohio, but the affirmed his conviction. The supreme court of Ohio dismissed his appeal.…

    • 331 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What is the basic argument given by Justice Powell on why the University of California’s admission policy was wrong?…

    • 118 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ginsburg Summary

    • 12620 Words
    • 51 Pages

    ON WRITS OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT [June 29, 2009]…

    • 12620 Words
    • 51 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law Chapter 5

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    • ensured any judicial decision with respect to such property rights will be honored and enforced in all states…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    14th Amendment Definition

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A provision on equal protection in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution looks towards protecting the civil rights of people living in the United States and has been used in defining the right of individuals and groups living in the country. In analyzing the provision of equal protection in the 14th amendment, the courts consider three aspects. First is the type of classification that a particular group falls through, for example, suspect classification or any other classification that the court can create and interpret. After determining the classification, the courts will determine the level of scrutiny applied to the identified class, whether it is a strict scrutiny or an intermediate scrutiny. Lastly is the determination of the kind of action that…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Student

    • 2030 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In that calculation, the Court is charged with determining whether the defendant is entitled to any…

    • 2030 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Business Law Midterm

    • 4536 Words
    • 19 Pages

    Be signed by the issuer (the maker in the case of a person undertaking to pay ot the drawer in the case of a person giving an order or instrument to pay)…

    • 4536 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A very big topic that lingers on the hearts and minds of so many Americans today, on the desks of so many politicians and in so many courtrooms around the country today is gay marriage. There are two very identifiable sides to this debate and both sides have very defendable points of view, which are constantly being publically expressed by radicals and extremist from both sides of the spectrum. My point of views differ from those who believe that gay marriage should remain illegal however, I am going to look at both sides of this huge debate and argue the point that homosexuals should be granted the right to marry whomever they please because it is not only unconstitutional, but unjust and logically improper to forfeit to this group of people the same, equal rights to marriage as heterosexuals simply because of their sexual orientation.…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to (Anderson, 2013) being created equal does not entail or require redefining marriage. Every marriage policy draws lines, leaving out some types of relationships. It is true that “marriage equality” makes a good slogan for activists and politicians, but true equality forbids arbitrary line-drawing. It requires that the state get marriage right. To do so we need to answer two questions: What is marriage? Why does it matter for policy?…

    • 1529 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gay Marriage in America

    • 1844 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In the United States, marriage has always played a crucial role in the lives of its citizens. Known to some as a lifetime commitment of devotion, to others a promise to reside with a stranger, or even a matter arranged by parents, marriage is widely practiced and celebrated all over the world. Marriage can be said to be the ultimate act of love, supported with benefits and privileges from the government. The right to marry and love whoever you want has been an corner stone in culture for centuries. It has naturally left such an impact on the development of our country that it has been integrated into the parameters of the law. However, out-dated traditions dictate that marriage must be between a man and a woman, a notion that has sparked much debate in a society where the battle for equal opportunity and freedom of expression run rampant. The institution of marriage is only as strong as those who are in it, and it is weakened, by definition, when it arbitrarily excludes any class of couples. Moreover, to outlaw same-sex marriage is to deny equal-individual’s rights and freedoms under the first amendment, and a clear discrimination against one of our founding principles that is held dear by many.…

    • 1844 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Doma Debate

    • 2390 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In this paper, we are going to outline the two major provisions of DOMA. We will explore the federal definition of marriage and whether this is justified. We will further discuss the rights granted to the states and their ability to decline same sex marriage from other states. We will discuss both pros and cons of each part of DOMA, and then provide our teams determination on which is the more persuasive argument.…

    • 2390 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Literal Construction

    • 9642 Words
    • 39 Pages

    The petitioners in this case filed the herein petition for certiorari, assailing as they do the decision of the Court of Appeals which held:[1]…

    • 9642 Words
    • 39 Pages
    Powerful Essays