Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Gay Marriage in America

Powerful Essays
1844 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gay Marriage in America
American government Research Paper
On gay marriage
10/2/12

In the United States, marriage has always played a crucial role in the lives of its citizens. Known to some as a lifetime commitment of devotion, to others a promise to reside with a stranger, or even a matter arranged by parents, marriage is widely practiced and celebrated all over the world. Marriage can be said to be the ultimate act of love, supported with benefits and privileges from the government. The right to marry and love whoever you want has been an corner stone in culture for centuries. It has naturally left such an impact on the development of our country that it has been integrated into the parameters of the law. However, out-dated traditions dictate that marriage must be between a man and a woman, a notion that has sparked much debate in a society where the battle for equal opportunity and freedom of expression run rampant. The institution of marriage is only as strong as those who are in it, and it is weakened, by definition, when it arbitrarily excludes any class of couples. Moreover, to outlaw same-sex marriage is to deny equal-individual’s rights and freedoms under the first amendment, and a clear discrimination against one of our founding principles that is held dear by many.

There has been a notable decline in the opposition of gay marriage. In 1996, three years after Bill Clinton’s “Don’t ask don’t tell” policy took effect, 68% of American’s opposed gay marriage. In 2012, after Obama publicly stated that he supported gay marriage, the disapproval drops down to 48% of opposition.[1] The ideal of gay liberty is a dividing factor among our political parties. 65% of Democrats and 24% of republican’s advocate the issue. Although only 3.5% of Americans accounts for the “outted” LGB community[2], it’s support has gain mainstream attention through pop-culture and mass media, and has become a keystone in the debates of many religious and political figures.
Like other issues that has drawn into question the confines of the first amendment (such as slavery and immigration) the effort to win equal marriage rights and benefits for same-sex couples has seen a tremendous increase of attention in recent years. Throughout early American history, homosexuality was considered taboo and criminal, which were punishable even by death; a clear violation and disregard for “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” as stated in the declaration. Prior to 1962, it was considered a felony in every state to perform any form of sodomy. In June of that year, Illinois become the first state to decriminalize homosexual sodomy between two adults in consensual acts in private. This set the profound benchmark for several other states to follow, initiating the drawn-out legal processes which eventually led the Supreme Court’s findings in Lawrence v. Texas to deem all sodomy laws to be unconditional, abolishing the laws in remaining states (Which contradicts a previous verdict in Bowers v. Hardwick). Thus, the frame work is set for the debate of equality in marriage for homosexuals. The first formal organization to advocate homosexuality was in 1951 when the Mattachine Society was formed by Harry Hay, which fought against issues of forced assimilation of gays . Police offices regally enforced laws against homosexuality in public . One of the most notorious events leading to their equal rights started with the stonewall riots in 1969. While police were conducting a regular raid of a gay bar, a argument broke out that infuriated those in attendance. In response to the brutality, they preformed random acts of violence against the police, which sent repercussions across the nation, bringing homosexuality into the realm of political discussion. In 1993 bill Clinton enacted the “don’t ask don’t tell” policy, which forbid the sexual preference of soldiers in the military to be questioned, while still maintaining the right to ban same-sex relationships and sexual acts. Much debate has arisen between the federal government and the states over national ban on homosexuality. In 1996, Bill Clinton signed into law The Defense of Marriage Act, which defines marriage as the union between a man and a woman. Under this law, no state is required to recognize a same-sex marriage from another state. However, an amendment to the constitution is required for the federal government to ban same-sex marriages throughout America, leaving room for state-to-state interpretation of their own constitutions. In 2000, Vermont became the first state to permit gay marriage, with several other states following suit. Other states, such as New Jersey, implemented a middle ground known as civil unions, which are a separate but equal approach to gay marriage. They allow for the same benefits of marriage, but have certain limitations. Many LGB advocates argue that such laws are discrimination, and point to the separate but equal Jim Crow laws which mandated segregation of blacks and whites.

Mit Romney has stood firm on his belief regarding gay marriage. He has stated on many occasions that “marriage itself is a relationship between a man and a woman” and that his personal belief in god and preference of his own sexuality has played a crucial rule in his political stance on the issue, displaying the quintessential Christian value in his justifications of heterosexual-only marriage. However, In his campaign against Ted Kennedy, he insists to the gay-rights community that even though his opponent, Ted Kennedy, was an ardent supporter of gay rights, he would be more effective in moving the issue into the main stream of American concern, interjecting that he supported the Federal Employee Nondiscrimination Act and Clinton 's "don 't ask, don 't tell" policy.[3] He also asserts that civil unions are an acceptable alternative in the battle for equal rights and has also openly stated that he supports laws established in regards to equality for homosexuals in the workplace, while rejecting the notion of marriage status for homosexual couples, right is a core belief of the majority of the conservative republicans.
Obama has recently flip-flopped on the issue of gay marriage. During his run for the Illinois senate in 1996, he endorsed gay marriage, only to retract his opinion on the matter when running for the U.S senate and for president. While in office, Obama made a statement that he, in fact, does support gay marriage and all the freedoms that come along with heterosexual marriage, and that homosexuals have the same right to love whomever they chose just as straight couples do. [4]
The Catholic Church has played a major role in the fight against gay-marriage rights. Its remains firm on Homosexual relationships as an intrinsic evil, which tares at the moral fiber of the sanctity of marriage. Using the bible as a reference, the church states that marriage’s purpose is to procreate a family in the eyes of god. Pope Benedict XVI strongly reasserts this age old passion in the opposition of gay marriage by saying “These values are non-negotiable and consequently, catholic politicians and legislators, conscious of their grave responsibilities before society, must feel particularly bound, on the basis of properly formed conscience, to introduce laws inspired by values grounded in human nature”[5] He has also warned American Catholic’s against voting outside the whelm of faith, and urges that the U.S. votes in favor of faith and morality.[6]

PFLAG, an interest group lobbying for the reform of marriage laws, holds bold beliefs that the fight for gay marriage won’t stop at laws being passed. The LGB movement greatly strives for acceptance and equal opportunities in every aspect of day to day life. They continue an active roll in lobbying for gay-marriage, and openly endorse Obama in the up-coming election. As we look forward to tomorrow, what can we predict for the gay marriage movement? Surely, if we were to look to the past through the eyes of the present, we could shed some knowledge to how we, as American’s, have found it to be held true, that we are enabled by our creator with certain inalienable rights, among which are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. As we treated the rights of African Americans before us, as well as to protect personal liberties under the constitution, should we not also protect any and all men, equally? Should that not also, extend to our person beliefs, and rights to love and marriage, regardless of gender? Marriage has and always will be, one of the most fundamental principles in our nation. Without marriage, we have no sense of love towards ourselves, without love towards ourselves, we have no sense of patriotism. And without patriotism, we have no basis in this country. As The Roman thinker once said “To not know the history of the world before you were born, causes you to forever remain, a child.”

Bibliography

(1) Crary, David ,“Gay marriage backed by 65 percent of Democrats in poll”, Associated Press 07/31/201 http://www.twincities.com/news/ci_21201372/gay-marriage-backed-by-65-percent-democrats-poll?source=rss

(2) Stark, Caitlin, “By the numbers: Same-sex marriage”, CNN Library, 5/12/12 http://www.cnn.com/2012/05/11/politics/btn-same-sex-marriage/index.html

(3) Jacobson, Louis. "MITT ROMNEY HAS MAINTAINED CONSISTENT STANCE ON SAME-SEX MARRIAGE." Tampa Bay Times [St. Petersburg, FL] 5/15/12, Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 2 Oct. 2012. Document URL http://skynet.ccm.edu:2121/ic/ovic/NewsDetailsPage/NewsDetailsWindow?failOverType=&query=&prodId=OVIC&windowstate=normal&contentModules=&mode=view&displayGroupName=News&limiter=&currPage=&disableHighlighting=false&source=&sortBy=&displayGroups=&action=e&catId=&activityType=&scanId=&documentId=GALE%7CA289822436&userGroupName=ccmorris&jsid=7d436f465f58f9c603d09a7772b249a6 (3) Sullivan, Amy. "Obama 's Case for Gay Marriage Shows That Invoking Faith Isn 't Just for Conservatives Anymore." Washington Post 5/15/12. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 2 Oct. 2012. Document URL http://skynet.ccm.edu:2121/ic/ovic/NewsDetailsPage/NewsDetailsWindow?failOverType=&query=&prodId=OVIC&windowstate=normal&contentModules=&mode=view&displayGroupName=News&limiter=&currPage=&disableHighlighting=false&source=&sortBy=&displayGroups=&action=e&catId=&activityType=&scanId=&documentId=GALE%7CA289754871&userGroupName=ccmorris&jsid=15226e8e8b5063b703d82404617a2a7d (4) Reinhard, Beth. "Gay Marriage: An Evolutionary War?" National Journal (2012). Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 2 Oct. 2012.Document URL http://ic.galegroup.com/ic/ovic/AcademicJournalsDetailsPage/AcademicJournalsDetailsWindow?failOverType=&query=&prodId=OVIC&windowstate=normal&contentModules=&mode=view&displayGroupName=Journals&limiter=&currPage=&disableHighlighting=false&source=&sortBy=&displayGroups=&action=e&catId=&activityType=&scanId=&documentId=GALE%7CA295772591&userGroupName=ccmorris&jsid=1d6a6d6f2d8a55dab9d1090b8978f0af

(5) Fisher, Ian. "Pope Reaffirms View Opposing Gay Marriage And Abortion." New York Times 14 Mar. 2007: A13(L). Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 2 Oct. 2012.Document URL http://skynet.ccm.edu:2121/ic/ovic/NewsDetailsPage/NewsDetailsWindow?failOverType=&query=&prodId=OVIC&windowstate=normal&contentModules=&mode=view&displayGroupName=News&limiter=&currPage=&disableHighlighting=false&source=&sortBy=&displayGroups=&action=e&catId=&activityType=&scanId=&documentId=GALE%7CA160509892&userGroupName=ccmorris&jsid=7bee25b1a97c41d95b686628be9a167c (6) “Gay Marriage Is a Human Right, Law Professor Says “, 04/13/2012 Mary J. Loftus, Associate Editor, 'Emory Magazine http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mary-j-loftus/catholic-church-and-gay-marriage

Bibliography: (1) Crary, David ,“Gay marriage backed by 65 percent of Democrats in poll”, Associated Press 07/31/201 http://www.twincities.com/news/ci_21201372/gay-marriage-backed-by-65-percent-democrats-poll?source=rss (2) Stark, Caitlin, “By the numbers: Same-sex marriage”, CNN Library, 5/12/12 http://www.cnn.com/2012/05/11/politics/btn-same-sex-marriage/index.html (3) Jacobson, Louis. "MITT ROMNEY HAS MAINTAINED CONSISTENT STANCE ON SAME-SEX MARRIAGE." Tampa Bay Times [St. Petersburg, FL] 5/15/12, Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 2 Oct. 2012. Document URL http://skynet.ccm.edu:2121/ic/ovic/NewsDetailsPage/NewsDetailsWindow?failOverType=&query=&prodId=OVIC&windowstate=normal&contentModules=&mode=view&displayGroupName=News&limiter=&currPage=&disableHighlighting=false&source=&sortBy=&displayGroups=&action=e&catId=&activityType=&scanId=&documentId=GALE%7CA289822436&userGroupName=ccmorris&jsid=7d436f465f58f9c603d09a7772b249a6 (3) Sullivan, Amy. "Obama 's Case for Gay Marriage Shows That Invoking Faith Isn 't Just for Conservatives Anymore." Washington Post 5/15/12. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 2 Oct. 2012. Document URL http://skynet.ccm.edu:2121/ic/ovic/NewsDetailsPage/NewsDetailsWindow?failOverType=&query=&prodId=OVIC&windowstate=normal&contentModules=&mode=view&displayGroupName=News&limiter=&currPage=&disableHighlighting=false&source=&sortBy=&displayGroups=&action=e&catId=&activityType=&scanId=&documentId=GALE%7CA289754871&userGroupName=ccmorris&jsid=15226e8e8b5063b703d82404617a2a7d (4) Reinhard, Beth. "Gay Marriage: An Evolutionary War?" National Journal (2012). Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 2 Oct. 2012.Document URL http://ic.galegroup.com/ic/ovic/AcademicJournalsDetailsPage/AcademicJournalsDetailsWindow?failOverType=&query=&prodId=OVIC&windowstate=normal&contentModules=&mode=view&displayGroupName=Journals&limiter=&currPage=&disableHighlighting=false&source=&sortBy=&displayGroups=&action=e&catId=&activityType=&scanId=&documentId=GALE%7CA295772591&userGroupName=ccmorris&jsid=1d6a6d6f2d8a55dab9d1090b8978f0af (5) Fisher, Ian. "Pope Reaffirms View Opposing Gay Marriage And Abortion." New York Times 14 Mar. 2007: A13(L). Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 2 Oct. 2012.Document URL http://skynet.ccm.edu:2121/ic/ovic/NewsDetailsPage/NewsDetailsWindow?failOverType=&query=&prodId=OVIC&windowstate=normal&contentModules=&mode=view&displayGroupName=News&limiter=&currPage=&disableHighlighting=false&source=&sortBy=&displayGroups=&action=e&catId=&activityType=&scanId=&documentId=GALE%7CA160509892&userGroupName=ccmorris&jsid=7bee25b1a97c41d95b686628be9a167c (6) “Gay Marriage Is a Human Right, Law Professor Says “, 04/13/2012 Mary J. Loftus, Associate Editor, 'Emory Magazine http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mary-j-loftus/catholic-church-and-gay-marriage

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    William J. Bennett, a great spokesman for American conservatives, has powerfully argued as the title indicates in his article "Against Gay Marriage." One does not have to agree with Bennett to appreciate the strength and goodness of his mind. Still, although he raises serious objections to same-sex marriage, his argument overall reads more like an outline, lacking specifics and expert opinions, referring to only one organized, careful study, and committing a number of logical fallacies which muddy and weaken his argument.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the world has developed-and is still developing- controversial topics like gay marriage are still prominent is today’s society. William J. Bennett, an influential figure in America, strongly voiced out his standpoint on the topic of same-sex marriage through his article “Against Gay Marriage.” His concerns persistently argue that the rights for gay marriages are “pointless and even oxymoronic” (Bennett, 2011, p.409). One does not need to fully agree with his assertions to acknowledge the intensity and goodness of his mind. Although Bennett’s stance constructs serious opposition and serves as a valuable argument, committing numerous logical fallacies in his text weaken his argument and made his overall reasoning less credible.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes on Prop 8

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages

    References: Farrell, M. (2010, January 25). Prop. 8 trial: defenders of gay-marriage ban make their…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first debate is a normative debate concerning “What relationships are intrinsically valuable. The second debate is an administrative debate concerning “What relationships between persons ought to be given legal recognition.” Koppelman’s second premise is that those opposed to gay-marriage cannot be sustained on moral ground claiming that “Homosexual relations are intrinsically wrong.” Koppelman’s third premise is that marriage law should be constructed to accommodate everyone, he claims that the state has enacted a “One size fits all default rules,” making it difficult for every different outcome to succeed. Koppelman’s forth premises is that the most successful heterosexual couples and their gay counterparts, claiming that homosexual’s love different from a heterosexual couple having their children inferior.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Doug Mainwaring’s September 21 editorial for the Washington Post, entitled “Why I oppose Gay Marriage” is a gay marriage opinion piece unlike many others. Mainwaring opens his piece explaining how a past Maryland petition opposing gay marriage has recently been brought back into the spotlight. The names of the people who had signed said petition were released, much to the shock of the general public, who were in awe to see the names of friends, neighbors, and family members in opposition of gay marriage. Mainwaring goes on to argue that because “Only a little more than 53%” of the signers were Republican, and the rest an assortment of parties, gay marriage is a “common, mainstream concern”, to be shared among citizens of all backgrounds.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Williams, Daniel. “New Rules Affirm Pope Benedict’s Stance Against Gays” The Washington Post 8 Oct. 2005. www.thewashingtonpost.com 29 Nov. 2009 <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/07/AR2005100701844.html>.…

    • 3778 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    WGU GLT1

    • 878 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There is growing attention to the issue of marriage equality for gay people in this country. As of the writing of this paper, 16 of the 50 states in the United States of America have legalized gay marriage, either by legislation or by popular vote (Wisniewski, 2013). The discourse regarding the issue becomes quite contentious largely because of non-secular ideology that has demonized the concept of homosexuality for many years. As a sociological issue, the conflict has become a divisive force for many, from political powers as far down to the family level. The constitution guarantees equal rights for all in this country; freedom of religion, speech, etc. yet appears to stall when equal rights for the gay community are involved. There has been significantly more popular support for the cause recently, but the stigma and prejudice continue to linger. Is this a moral debate or has an outdated ideology become so embraced by many that the battle has only just begun?…

    • 878 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gay marriages have been one of the hottest and controversial topics in our society. There are still problems concerning this issue of homosexuality and gay marriages. Same sex marriages are legal in Hawaii, but in all other states couples must be of the opposite sex to form a marriage. Hawaii’s decision to legalize same sex marriages is considered a milestone victory for gays and may cause a ripple affect for similar action in other states. Those who support gay marriages justify their position by the concept of love. These supporters of gay marriages feel as though gay people are being deprived of their right to love. Many people believe that gay people deserve the right to love and to take that love and form a marriage. These people believe that gays want to feel justified, meaning that as a couple they should be able to define their own marriage for themselves and make their own set of rules. Supports of same-sex marriages feel as though homosexuals are being deprived of their God given right to get married. They believe that arguments against same sex marriages are unconstitutional, and they simply do not justify a ban on same sex marriages. It is not the idea of two people of the same sex getting married that frightens people so much, but it is the thought of change and the fact that the federal government will redefine marriage to allow same sex unions. When people picture the results of same sex marriages, they see images of unstable homes. Everyone would probably agree that homosexuality has changed our society, and legalizing same sex marriages is not likely to be an exception. It would be an injustice to discriminate against a person if he or she were…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gay Marriage and Conflict

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Myers, D. G., & Scanzoni, L. D. (2005). A Christian Case for Gay Marriage: What Gad has Joined Together. New York:…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gay marriage has been the cause of intense debate in the United States for years. Sexual activity within the same gender was something that was considered normal in Greek and Roman times but in today’s society, there is a great amount of controversy concerning sexual activity between homosexuals and same-sex marriage. A couple of reasons why gay marriage has become so controversial is because of religion, the issue of procreation, and the concern for children who are raised in same sex house-holds. Although there are a great deal of people who find gay marriage to be considered a negative idea, there is also a significant amount of people who are for gay marriage and would like gay marriage to be legal in the United States. According to The Associated Press 3/27/13, a “Pew Research Center poll” that took place in March shows that the number of people in America who approve gay marriage are up to forty-nine percent and there is forty-four percent of people who do not approve (par.6). These percentages show that both sides of opinion come close in number and when there is a great amount of differences in opinion on one given subject, conflict will certainly arise.…

    • 1599 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People often wonder why same-sex couples can’t be satisfied with just civil union. They said this because they don’t really understand the difference. Gay marriage and civil unions differ in various ways. To start off, civil union lacks the automatic protections and peace of mind that marriage confers. Secondly, marriages are recognized worldwide, while civil union exists only in the state that the couple resides. The significant difference between gay marriage and civil unions is that only marriage offers federal benefits and protections. Marriages are far more beneficial than civil unions.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gay Marriage Rebuttal

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The article I read was an interview of a reverend by a radio talk show host regarding gay marriage rights. In this interview there was much discussed but only one argument that clearly defined the reverends position on gay marriage. In reference to the topic of gay marriage the reverend, an opponent of gay marriage was asked why he did not feel that gays should be allowed to marry. The conversation is as follows.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Writing Project three

    • 1642 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The legalization of same-sex marriage is fought strongly by both sides. Those against same-sex marriages fear legalizing them would diminish traditional marriages, along with having other concerns. The main view of those for same-sex marriage legalization is that they see it as a right to gays and lesbians. The question is which side is right? Would the legalization of same-sex marriages take away from traditional marriages or is it a right not being honored? The question of same-sex marriage brings with it the question why. Is it important for same-sex marriages to be legalized considering that same-sex couples can live in cohabitation even in the states where same-sex marriages are illegal? These are a few of the age old questions pertaining to the issue of same-sex marriage legalization. While many American’s view on marriage is that they are between a man and a woman, there are still several who believe same-sex marriages should be legalized.…

    • 1642 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most controversial topics of today’s matter is whether gay marriage should be legalized or not. There are numerous reactions when this subject comes to discussion and can sometimes lead to a heated debate. Some individuals believe that homosexuality is unethical while people who agree with gay marriage believe to put in consideration that the sexual preference of another human being is necessary. With every conflict comes pros and cons and this topic is like pulling a tight-rope if ever brought up in a debate because you never know who will pull the rope tighter. Gay marriage has a vast influence on the society today, relevant to it becoming legalized, it is bound to impact future generations, and will affect the establishment of marriage later in life.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pro Gay Marriage

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When you think of gays or lesbians does it really bother you? Think to yourself, what are they doing to affect your life? Most of you would most likely say nothing at all. There is not a single piece of history that determines whether or not same sex marriage is right or wrong. There is absolutely no legal, logical, or governing reason that same sex couples cannot be married and it 's extremely unconstitutional in every way to tell them they can 't. Same sex marriage should be legal for a number of reasons, a few being, it 's no one else 's business if two men or two women want to get married, not allowing them to marry makes them seem inferior, and it rids them of their civil rights. Everyone is entitled to their constitutional rights: Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics