Preview

Business Ethic

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
14871 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Business Ethic
Mergers & Acquisitions:
Hostile takeovers and defense strategies against them

Bachelor thesis
Samim Zarin 880825-5171
Erik Yang 890422-1176
Tutor:
Harald Dolles
Department of Business & Administration
International Business
Spring 2011

1

Bachelor’s Thesis in International Business
Title:

Mergers & Acquisitions - Hostile takeovers and defense strategies against them

Author:

Erik Yang and Samim Zarin

Tutor:

Harald Dolles

Date:

[2011-07]

Keywords: Hostile takeover, merger & acquisitions, defense strategies

Abstract
Mergers and acquisitions is a way for companies to grow, establish and gain entry to new markets. They can be categorized as either friendly or hostile. A hostile takeover occurs when a company gains control over a targeted company without the consent from either the board of directors or the management of the target company. Instead the aim of the acquirer is to persuade and charm the shareholders of the targeted company to sell their stock. Since every publicly listed company faces the risk of being a target for a hostile takeover, many companies protect themselves by implementing various defense measurements and strategies.
These strategies could be either pro-active, such as the poison pill and staggered board defense strategy or re-active, such as the crown jewel and white knight defense strategy. The purpose of this thesis is to describe and explain which defense strategies are the most effective and easiest to implement when facing a hostile takeover.
Based on our researches and analyzes, we believe and argue that the most easiest and effective way of fending off a hostile bid, is to implement both the poison pill and staggered board defense measurements combined. By doing this, the acquirer is not able to gain immediate control over the target company and the poison pill defense measurement help stagger and make the bid more expensive for the bidder.

2

Acknowledgements
We would

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    finance manamgement

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The hostility is between managements and boards of directors. The target's stockholders are generally only interested in the return on their investments. Therefore if an acquiring company offers a hefty premium, they're nothing but pleased.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Corp 2

    • 3330 Words
    • 14 Pages

    * B the acquisition by a corporation of another using solely stock of each corp…

    • 3330 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Which of the following is NOT normally regarded as being a barrier to hostile takeovers? (Points : 5)…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Elecriccity and Magnatism

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A hostile takeover defense wherein the target firm makes its stock less attractive to a potential acquirer is called…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    M&a Exam Review

    • 2985 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Either another corporation or group of individuals can acquire the target firm, or the target firm can merge with another firm.…

    • 2985 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The firm is considering takeover offers assumingly because the competition is attempting to gain market share. There is no evidence in the case which…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hello World

    • 18274 Words
    • 74 Pages

    Keywords: Mergers, acquisitions, signaling, material adverse change clauses and exclusions JEL classification: D86, G14, G32, G34 This draft: April 2013…

    • 18274 Words
    • 74 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the contrary, hostile takeover means company A forces to "takeover" company B in such ways like mandatorily buying a lot of company B's stock, even though the board of directors of B are not willing to be bought. It reminds me of something I knew when I was in college. In last April, 2012, there was a company called Coty wanted to buy Avon, offering a $10 billion buyout bid. "The Coty all-cash bid values New York-based Avon at $23.25 a share, representing 20.1% premium on its friday closing price." (FOX) Avon even stated "Coty's indication of interest substantially undervalues Avon and is opportunistically timed." Even though Coty considered it was not a hostile takeover and was trying to up the price, I still think it is a hostile takeover action. As a commenter Ronald Barusch said: "Nevertheless, just because there is no hostile tender offer does not make this anything like a friendly deal." (WSJ), I think coty adds pressure with other competitors about the price war. So I still think it acts like hostile takeover.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Geographic Isolationism

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    ____________ is defined as the development and maintenance of military strength as a means of discouraging attack. Deterrence…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Friendly Takeover

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This is a research assignment regarding the analysis of a friendly takeover example and a hostile takeover example in the year 2010 to 2011. As for the friendly takeover acquisition, it is still in process with a vertical business combination of building materials supper and peat moss distributor. As for the hostile takeover acquisition, this is a Horizontal Business Combination of two mineral mining companies.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reverse takeovers, when a smaller company acquires a larger one, are even worse. Like Tata Steel buying Corus or Tata Motors buying Jaguar-Land Rover. In both cases, the ambition was to become global companies in quick time. But the prices paid in both cases were too high, and the timing was wrong. The shares of both companies tanked while they scrambled to raise money to cover the huge acquisition debt.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hostile Takeover and Ethics

    • 6769 Words
    • 28 Pages

    A Hostile Takeover is an acquisition in which the company being purchased doesn't want to be purchased, or doesn't want to be purchased by the particular buyer that is making a bid. Members of management might want to avoid acquisition because they are often replaced in the aftermath of a buyout. They are simply protecting their jobs. The board of directors or the shareholders might feel that the deal would reduce the value of the company, or put it in danger of going out of business. Then, how can someone buy something that's not for sale? Hostile takeovers only work with publicly traded companies. That is, they have issued stock that can be bought and sold on public stock markets. A stock confers a share of ownership in the company that issued it. If a company issued 1,000 shares, and say Mr. X owns 100 of them, then he owns a tenth of that company. If he owns more than 500 shares, he owns a majority or controlling interest in that company. When the company makes major decisions, the shareholders must vote on them. The more shares you have, the more votes you get. If you own more than half of the shares, you always have a majority of the votes. In many respects, you can control the company. So a hostile takeover boils down to this: The buyer has to gain control of the target company and force them to agree to the sale.…

    • 6769 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mergers

    • 3420 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Fundamentals of Financial Management, 12e Chapter 23: Mergers and Other Forms of Corporate Restructuring After studying Chapter 23, you should be able to: Chapter 23 Explain why a company might decide to engage in corporate restructuring. Understand and calculate the impact on earnings and on market value of companies involved in mergers. Describe what benefits, if any, accrue to acquiring company shareholders and to selling company shareholders. Analyze a proposed merger as a capital budgeting problem.…

    • 3420 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Conrail

    • 1461 Words
    • 24 Pages

    Acquisition Wars Prof. Ian Giddy New York University Mergers and Acquisitions Mergers & Acquisitions  Valuation  Divestitures  Concept: Is a division or firm worth more within the company, or outside it? Copyright ©2002…

    • 1461 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mergers and Acquisitions

    • 11574 Words
    • 47 Pages

    MERGER & ACQUISITION IN INDIA MERGER & ACQUISITION IN INDIA Page 1 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.…

    • 11574 Words
    • 47 Pages
    Powerful Essays