Preview

British West Indies- Amelioration Proposals

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1313 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
British West Indies- Amelioration Proposals
Amelioration refers to the act of relieving ills, and changing for the better.

The West India Interest was made up of planters who lived in the colonies and those in the mother colonies. The London Society for the gradual abolition of slavery was formed in 1823. The society wanted amelioration to be made a part of the government’s policy, to be enforced by law and to be followed by abolition (at an early date). Thomas Fowell Buxton, the chief parliamentary spokesman on slavery introduced in 1823 his famous resolution that slavery “ought to be gradually abolished throughout the British colonies”. However, the West India Interest was determined to undermine the activities of the anti-slavery society. In order to prevent the abolition of slavery, they decided to draft their own amelioration proposals. The proposals seemed reasonable so Buxton, not knowing the true intentions of the West India Interest, withdrew his resolution. The amelioration proposals put forward by the West India Interest were accepted and George Canning the foreign minister put forward the Amelioration bill based on these proposals.

Reasons for the West India Interest Amelioration Proposals. 1. They wanted to appease the humanitarians. 2. Undermine the efforts of the abolitionists. 3. Forestall the abolition of slavery. 4. Improve the conditions under which the slaves lived.
Responses to the Amelioration Proposals.
PLANTERS.
They fiercely resisted and rejected the amelioration proposals in all colonies. For example: 1. The assembly in Barbados arrayed that the slave laws were already lenient. 2. Trinidad planters asked that the proposals be withdrawn. 3. The 1820 revised slave code in Jamaica violated the proposals: slaves could not receive religious instruction, church services were forbidden and slaves could not preach without their owner’s consent. SLAVES.

The slaves believed the proposals meant freedom had been granted but was being withheld which

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Assignment 1 AMH2020

    • 654 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During reconstruction, the meaning of freedom suited many different types of interpretation; the perception of freedom between former slaves and their slaves masters were very contradictory. To begin with, African-Americans had suffered severe abuse over those years of slavery, so to them, the meaning of freedom was basically a hope that in the future, they won’t experience all kind of punishment and exploration that they have been experienced so far. Besides that, formers slaves were demanding equal civil and political rights. In the same way, they valued their freedom by establishing their own schools and churches, reuniting families that were separated under slavery and seeking financial dependence. Foner (2014) supports the same argument: “Blacks relished the opportunity to demonstrate their liberation from the regulation, significant and trivial, associated with slavery. They openly held mass meeting and religious services free of white supervision” (p. 557) . In addition, Foner (1014) also found “Former slaves’ ideas of freedom, like those of rural people throughout the world, were directly related to landownership” (p. 560) . On other hand, their slaves masters’ perception of freedom was different. For example, most Southerners reacted the emancipation with dismay, according to Foner (2014) , Southern leaders didn’t want to accept reality “Freedom still meant hierarchy and mastery; it was a privilege not a right, a carefully defined legal status rather than an open-ended entitlement” (p. 561) .…

    • 654 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I'M King

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. What did the slaves want from Reconstruction? To what extent were their aspirations fulfilled?…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    slavery was doomed and that a rebellion from the Union would happen. The speech hastened the…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This only applied to Confederate States outside of the union and border-states were still allowed to keep their slaves. Eventually, in 1865, the 13th amendment was passed which abolished slavery. Even though blacks were now freed, they had no role in society yet and had difficulty adjusting to their new freedom. In a political view of things, more Republicans were introduced into both houses of Congress, which meant more support of their freedom. Democrats were more opposed to their freedom and criticized Lincoln. In Document C, we see that African Americans are able to fight in the war and be considered free but are still unable to vote. They still feel neglected because the courts won't listen to their testimony. Document D also agrees with this and states that the Federal government should not be able to cause suffrage in states. Even though blacks are freed, they still don't have any tangible…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three Fifth Compromises

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This clause let slaves…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Lincoln-Douglas Debate Number One: Ottawa August 21, Lincoln states, “I hate it because of the monstrous injustice of slavery itself. I hate it because it deprives our republican example of its just influence in the world—enables the enemies of free institutions, with plausibility, to taunt us as hypocrites—causes the real friends of freedom to doubt our sincerity”. Now for Lincoln to say such sincere words about slavery, shows that he emancipated slaves for the right reasons and with nothing but good intentions. Lincoln’s intention to free all slaves of their injustice substantiates his worthiness to have the title of “the Great Emancipator”, regardless of what Frederick Douglass had to say.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dbq Civil War

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This portion of the act was proposed to appeal to the liking of the south. Although it may have appealed to the south it also stirred feelings in the north. The laws were not practical as they violated the slaves 6th amendment right to a trial by jury, also the slaves could not testify of their own behalf. Angered by this many states passes personal liberty laws which prohibit the imprisonment of the runaway slaves and permitted them a trial by jury. The push for the rights for African Americans and slaves as a whole led to an abolitionist movement to be sparked throughout the united states that opened up many northerners and southerners eyes to the harsh realities of slaver and how morally wrong it was. As these abolitionist feelings intensified so did the dispute over whether or not slavery should be allowed in the disputed territories of present day Kansa and Nebraska that were supposed to be settled in the compromise of…

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    They did not understand individual or human rights. Individual or human rights states that all people are born with some natural rights because they are human. Document 5: Plan of a Slave Ship describes what the slave ships looked like ,and how the slaves were treated. The document reads, “Slaves had no legal rights and were forbidden to read or write.” They were treated worse than animals. They were not given their human rights. They were in no way treated as a human with individual rights.…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ex slaves defined freedom after reconstruction as not having to listen to the white man, by not being controlled whenever they wanted and to build their own society such as churches, schools, and businesses. They also defined freedom as having the same rights as the whites.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “That on the first day of January, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-three, all persons held as slaves within any State or designated part of a State, the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the United States, shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free; and the Executive Government of the United States, including the military and naval authority thereof, will recognize and maintain the freedom of such persons, and will do no act to repress such persons, or any of them, in any efforts they may make for their actual freedom.” (http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/featured_documents/emancipation_proclamation)…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    If it wasn’t for the final parliamentary reform, campaigns and religious groups getting together to abolish slavery our ancestor would be still in slavery in the world would not have been a better place. Many people were very prejudiced in their beliefs. Slavery’s primary victims, mostly knowing nothing of the Declaration itself, would corroborate its truth by their various acts of resistance, displaying their natural love of liberty and their moral humanity as rights possessors. These displays of humanity would naturally arouse the sympathy of non-slaveholders, a few of whom at first, and more with the passage of time, would take up the cause of abolition. Frederick Douglas as a free man reflective of racial prejudice that it was wrong how slaves had been mistreated. Why was it important for them to have liberty and be…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Non Free Slave Codes

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page

    Slave codes were made in the favor of slave owners, especially for those in the south. Laws were passed stating that owners could not free their own slaves. Any slaves that were free had to leave the colony. They were not allowed to read, and owners were not allowed to teach them how to read. Non-free slaves found outside of the colony could not be killed or enslaved by anyone else because they were considered property. They had to be returned to their owner and face the brutal consequences. Even converting to Christianity would not be able to save them.…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “You know I dislike slavery; and you fully admit the abstract wrong of it. So far there is no cause of difference. But you say that sooner than yield your legal right to the slave, especially at the bidding of…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They believed they owned the slaves—not as people but as property. This sense of ownership blinded slave owners with greed and self-indulgence. They were focused on making profits and abusing their “property.” They were working towards immorality and corruption without the slightest remorse of their actions. However, there were some owners who, compared to others, treated their workers with a bit more compassion. These owners taught their laborers how to read and write. They, although seemingly cruel to their fellow Northerners, didn’t abuse their right of ownership. Instead of completely taking control of a slave’s mind, they gave him a taste of the outside world to suppress their rebellious mindsets. Owning slaves gave southerner’s power over them, granting them…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louisiana Purchase

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When Abraham Lincoln signed The Emancipation Proclamation on June 1, 1863, he intended to emancipate all slaves of the southern states, which no longer belonged to The Union. This order applied only to slaves in Confederate-held lands however, which essentially made this Proclamation a “hollow decree”. Lincoln was conscious of what he was doing however, and he knew that once word of The Emancipation Proclamation spread, it would motivate slave rebellions even more, and encourage slaves to escape and fight for their…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays