Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Ap World History Ch. 5 Notes

Good Essays
1019 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ap World History Ch. 5 Notes
W
APWH CH. 5 EQ NOTES

|Question 1: What were the features of Roman society and politics during the Republic? |
|Topic Sentence |
|Agriculture was the central economic activity in Republic Rome which meant land was the basis of wealth. |
|Social status, political privileges, and fundamental values were based off it. |
|Heads of wealthy families formed a Senate (Council of Elders) who dominated politics |
|7 kings- Romulus, Tarquinais = dictator, Brutus a liberator, and Tarquinais Superbus made the res publica, or republic |
|Republic wasn’t a democracy b/c only male citizens could vote, and wealthy people’s votes counted more than commoner votes |
|Annual elections for each year for all officers and center of careers were focued on becoming one of 2 consuls who oversaw the Senate and lead|
|military missions |
|Senate= real power and became hereditary because Senators kept nominating their sons for office |
|Served as council, but made increasingly more policy decisions. |
|Conflict of Orders- Patricians vs. Plebeians became a fight between the rich wealthy class and the majority peasant class |
|Rioted and boycotted city to force Patricians to make important political concessions and were forced to write 12 laws of stone tablets |
|protecting the Plebeians from the wealthy class |
|Patriarchal family structure- the paterfamilias had supreme power over everyone in the household |
|Patron/client relationship mirrors the modern incumbency advantages because the wealthy protect the poor farmers to ensure their votes in the|
|next election |
|Conclusion |
|The Republic of Rome served less as a Republic than an oligarchy of the Senate based on the social principles and political values. |
|Question 2: How did society and politics change during the Roman Principate? |
|Topic Sentence |
|Roman society and politics came under the rule of Octavian Augustus who drastically reformatted Roman society and government. |
|Octavian (Julius Caesars grand nephew) decided to change the Roman government structure from a Republic |
|Made it an empire, but never used the word king or emperor, but Princeps, which means “first among equals” |
|Kept general Senate and lower offices to disguise government |
|He allied himself with equites, or the wealthy merchants, and formed the well educated and self assured people in the community |
|More strict laws to enforce new government |
|Conclusion |
|The Roman Principate turned Rome into a more precisely governed state. |
|Question 3: How did Christianity grow and spread during the Roman Principate? |
|Topic Sentence |
|Christianity grew and spread by missionaries and conquering. |
|Paul documented and converted a lot of people to Christainity. |
|Word spread through disciples such as Paul. Paul set up the doctrines that are the basis for Christianity |
|Jesus was sent by God to redeem humanity from sins. |
|By dying on the cross, Jesus made it possible for humans to be saved. |
|Annual elections for each year for all officers and center of careers were focued on becoming one of 2 consuls who oversaw the Senate and lead|
|military missions |
|Senate= real power and became hereditary because Senators kept nominating their sons for office |
|Served as council, but made increasingly more policy decisions. |
|Conflict of Orders- Patricians vs. Plebeians became a fight between the rich wealthy class and the majority peasant class |
|Rioted and boycotted city to force Patricians to make important political concessions and were forced to write 12 laws of stone tablets |
|protecting the Plebeians from the wealthy class |
|Patriarchal family structure- the paterfamilias had supreme power over everyone in the household |
|Anyone could be saved through faith in God, and this was better for people. |
|Christianity spread because of its appeal to those who led hard lives. Christianity gave a sense of community and fellowship to the people. |
|The people saw others who were willing to die for a religion. |
|Conclusion |
|The Greeks significantly developed from the Dark Ages to being the most sophisticated culture in the Classical World. |
|Question 4: What changes did the Qin and Han dynasties bring to Chinese society and politics? |
|Topic Sentence |
|The Qin and Han dynasties revolutionized and militarily advanced Chinese society. |
|Qin abolished primo genture which was the law which gave all money to eldest son |
|Qin invoked legalism which united the region during the Warring States period. But it had extremely tough laws which gave the emperor supreme |
|power and the ideology believed that unity came before personal freedom. |
|Qin weakened nobles to give himself more power. |
|Established code of law which standardized punishment |
|Coinage, system of writing |
|Han denounced Qin harshness and laws and invoked Confucianism to replace Legalism |
|Eastern part was given to close relatives which lead to fall of Han dynasty. But it was good in early part of the era so the central |
|government had less land to control. |
|Empress got majority of the power because small children were becoming emperors and had pull over their children. |
|Women had NO rights under Confucianism. (Very similar to hindu society) |
|Women had follow and obey 3 rules in live- they had to either follow their parents, husband, or sons at all times. |
|Couldn’t vote, do jobs outside their house, or anything not related to their homes |
|Conclusion |
|The Qin and Han dynasties were extremely different in the way they ruled, but they improved the infrastructure and united the region. |
|Question 5: What were similarities between the falls of both the Han and Roman empires? |
|Topic Sentence |
|The Empires of Rome and Han faced similar problems which lead to the collapse of their empires. |
|Similar problems of defense plagued them both because they had long lines of defense. |
|Land very far from the administrative center which made it easier for nomads to conquer. |
|Aggressive neighbors who wanted their property |
|Because they were imperial, they demanded a lot in taxes and labor from people, and their own people eventually got alienated |
|The aggressive neighbors eventually closed the technology gap and learned how to fight and beat their well trained monogamous armies |
|Eventually, both were weakened at their borders and overrun by nomadic or barbarian peoples and central governments collapsed |
|Funnily, the newly dominant groups ended up keeping the culture because it was so well developed. |
|Conclusion |
|Both the Han and Roman empires collapsed because their borders were overrun by nomadic peoples. |

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    After Muhammad’s death, there was quarreling between his followers over who should succeed him. The afternoon that he died, a caliph, or religious successor to Muhammad, was designated. Abu Bakr was chosen for his warmth, courage, and wisdom. He knew that which Bedouin tribes could be turned against each other and which could be enticed into alliances.…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    o “The Senate was regarded as the central institution of the Roman state” (Beard and Crawford).…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    a. Elusive concept: an eternal principle governing all the workings of the world b. Dao is passive and yielding, does nothing…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To intertwine the economic and political difference between the Patricians and the Plebeian class, the economical aspect must first be examined. Plebeian economical environments consisted of property positioned outside of the walls of Rome with most of these properties consisting of farms subjected to various elements that made the properties easily worthless during the early times of Rome. Patrician economical environments consisted of property positioned inside of the walls of Rome, which conceded a higher amount of protection and retained either its’ original value or a close match.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Athens Under Solon

    • 2325 Words
    • 10 Pages

    When the city of Athens stood on the brink of revolution, the citizens of Athens looked upon Solon and gave him the task of creating new laws for them because of troubles that had been plaguing them for a long time. “ They saw that he more than anyone else in city, stood apart from the injustices of the time and was involved neither in the extortions of the rich nor the privations of the poor” (Plutarch 55, Par 1). In this paper I will be writing of changes that took effect under Solon and whether those changes resolved the conflicts that brought Athens on the brink of revolution. First, I will be writing about the conflict over land ownership and slavery between aristocrats and common people, who appointed Solon as reconciler and archon and whether his new laws resolved those conflicts. Secondly, I will be writing of conflict over power between aristocrats and aristocrats, feuds that used to run between families and would not get resolved until there was no one left to take revenge on and how Solon’s new laws changed that. And another laws of Solon’s that he was highly appraised for to make an Athens better place under him such as laws on Dowry, Inheritance, and Wills. Thirdly, I will be writing of political laws that took places under Solon’s era and how he secured those laws against alteration for a hundred years that gave powers to common people in Athens. The Two sources I will be using to write this paper are The Athenian Constitution (The document given in class by Prof. Trumbach) and Plutarch: The Rise and fall of Athens (Textbook assigned for class).…

    • 2325 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Struggle of the Orders was a social conflict between the two social classes of ancient Rome, comprised of the plebians (common people) and the patricians (aristocracy). Plebians were often treated unequally in comparison to the patricians, who owned most of the wealth of the Republic, were the only ones able to hold high office, and kept plebians out of their marriages. In order to speak out against the discrimination and force concessions from the patricians, the plebians performed a boycott by walking out of Rome and refusing to serve in the army in 494 B.C.E. The boycott was successful, and the patricians decided to allow intermarriage between the two classes, gave formal recognition to the plebians' right to elect their own officials…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The patrician class of Rome grew out of those Romans who were advisors to the old Etruscan kings who ruled from 616 to 509 BCE. Their names meant that they were, or chose, the “patres” (fathers) of the state. As befitted such a title, they were wealthy, upper-class landowners, the sorts of men you would expect to be royal advisors. However, this meant that there had to be a class that was not part of that fatherhood, that wealthy elite, and indeed there was - the plebeians, whose name is derived from “plebs,” meaning many. While Rome eventually rebelled against its Etruscan rulers, the rules of law put in place instead were only better for the patricians - more democratic, more open, but only for the few, and not for the many:…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the collapse of the monarchy and the creation of the Republic had taken place, it is when the control of Roman government was allowed to only a small groups of influential families called the patricians. The remaining residents were the plebeians. Slowly giving way to a commonwealth (res publica), a state governed by the people. The agricultural population of ancient Rome consisted of a dominant class of large landowners, the patricians, and other class of farmers and small landowners called plebeians.The plebians began not to like being second-class and started demanding to join into the affairs of their state and have their voices heard as citizens of Rome. The Conflict of the Orders also looked like the “Struggle of the…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Beard and Crawford present their material in an easily readable, and quite short, manner. They have separated their arguments into that which the reader can comprehend and associate with outside information concerning the history of Rome. However, there is a problem, regarding the historical aspect, whereas Beard and Crawford do not give particular examples of historical events, or the like. It is not a problem if the reader has an understanding of the subject, but if someone were not to possess such knowledge, then they would be at a disadvantage, because of this lapse on the authors’ part. For instance, the statement, “As the political system came increasingly under the dominance of powerful individuals, so those individuals, tended also to monopolize links with divine,” does not provide an adequate perception to the certain individuals, which can be learned in other fashions to represent people like Julius Caesar, who served as Pontifex Maximus. Considering this lack of direct historical evidence, the book appears to be more based in a literary manner, with indirect historical evidence, as mentioned. In the literary sense, the authors give their supposition into why the Republic…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Roman Citizenship

    • 1205 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Bibliography: . Hand-outs from our teacher2. http://www.dl.ket.org/latin1/mores/3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_citizen4. http://www.dl.ket.org/latin1/mores/law/citizenship.htm5. Lewis, Naphtali & Reinhold Meyer (ed.) 1966, "Roman Civilization Sourcebook 1: The Republic", Harper Torchbooks, New York6. Lewis, Naphtali & Rein hold Meyer (ed.) 1966, "Roman Civilization Sourcebook 2: The Empire", Harper Torchbooks, New York.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The consuls consisted of two men who controlled the army, decided cost of tax, and made the laws. The two men were also the decision makers on whether to start a war or to subside. If any change to the law or taxes was to be made, both the men had to agree. If one of them did not accede, there was no change made. The two men governed for one year and were voted out if they did not meet the expectations of the people. The consuls didn’t make all the decisions by themselves. They received advice from the Senate and usually did as the Senate advised. The Senate was made of about 600 men who were from rich families. The men from the Senate were to advise and look over the decisions of the consuls. Once a man received a spot in the Senate, he stayed in for his entire life. Most of the consuls ended up joining the Senate. Within the Senate there was a group called the Tribunes, who were people that spoke for the poor citizens. The Tribunes were allowed to deny any law or rule that would affect the poor. Then there were prefects who ran the city by maintaining meat and vegetable markets, and also by hearing cases of the citizens. The male citizens make up the last group called the assembly. They were allowed to vote on big law changes and they elected the consuls, prefects, and the Senators. This system was used for around 450 years and then was once again changed.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Roman Aristocracy

    • 4219 Words
    • 17 Pages

    What virtues and attainments defined the Roman aristocrat in the Republic? How, if at all, did this conception of the aristocrat change during the empire? Select one biography, by either Suetonius or Plutarch: discuss its subject’s successes and failures in realizing the appropriate aristocratic ideal. Include in your essay some consideration of the importance placed on this matter by the biography’s author (that is, is the matter of aristocratic excellence relevant to the biography, and, if so, in what ways? If not, why not?)…

    • 4219 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Roman Empire

    • 9199 Words
    • 37 Pages

    * Identify key events and leaders of each of the first two divisions of Roman history: Pre-Republic and Republic.…

    • 9199 Words
    • 37 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Political inequality There are several developed political institutions during the Roman Republic period. The consuls, the executive power, were there. It was considered a very high title. There were two of them at any given time. They could veto each other to keep away any one consul from getting too powerful. And there was a Senate, which is elected to be the oldest and wisest of the citizens. In the early days, the consuls and senators were elected from the patricians who were mostly wealthy landowning families from…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Quiz Roman Republic

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The first crisis of the Roman Republic when the commoners walked out of Rome threatening to form a new city state because of exploitation was called the ______________________________________.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays