Plea Bargaining Paper Linda Robinson CJA/224 09/29/2014 Many successful criminal prosecutions in the Unites States end not with Jury trials‚ but with plea bargains. Plea bargains are agreements between defendants and prosecutors where defendants agree to plead guilty to some or all of the charges against them in exchange for concessions from the prosecutors. These agreements allow prosecutors to focus their time and resources on other cases and reduce the number of trials that judges need
Premium Jury trial Criminal law Prosecutor
are the driving force of organizations and have different perceptions of justice‚ it is essential for organizations to manage organizational justice so that employees will be motivated to contribute positively. The three principles of justice‚ distributive‚ procedural and interactional ensure that managers’ decision making process will become transparent and therefore improve employees’ perceptions of justice. Theoretical perspectives Equity theory relates to employees’ perceptions of inputs to
Premium Distributive justice Decision making Culture
| What’s in a Name? | Major Negotiation Case Based Exercise | | MGX5630Principles of negotiation | | | I will tell you the mistake you are always making. . . . You draw up your plans the day before the battle‚ when you do not yet know your adversary’s movements‚ or what positions you will have to occupy. NAPOLEON BONAPARTE FRENCH EMPEROR AND GENERAL This negotiation role-play case analysis was performed during on campus classes held at Monash University on Friday 24th Feb
Premium Negotiation Bargaining
Robert Nozick breaks down his theory of distributive justice into three guidelines of justice which define how something not formerly owned by someone may be acquired‚ how possession of an item can be transferred from one individual to another and what should be done to resolve situations in which one of the first two rules in violated. For people to better understand his theory‚ Nozick uses a neutral term to define the possession of things‚ calling them “people’s holdings”. The principle of his
Premium
positive effects on cumulative satisfaction while only one dimension of service quality (interaction quality) has a significant and positive effect on transaction-specific satisfaction. Besides procedural justice‚ the other two dimensions of justice (distributive justice and interactional justice) significantly influence both transaction-specific satisfaction and cumulative satisfaction. Furthermore‚ both types of customer satisfaction have significant and positive effects on continuance intention. Implications
Premium Dimension Service Service system
priorities is often the most important activities. * The most important issue during negotiation is preserving or enhancing the relationship. * Resolution of issues has implications for the future. Distributive dynamics can create reputation problems for the future. * Distributive issues can be emotionally hot. If one party feels strongly about the issues or the other acts provocatively‚ the parties can become angry with each other. Parties must cool off and apologize or cool off before
Premium Negotiation Distributive justice
purpose of this paper seeks to examine a crime through the lens of four theories of justice: retributive‚ utilitarian‚ restorative‚ and parallel. Moreover‚ the paper will elaborate more on each theory of justice‚ including the theory’s procedural and distributive justice‚ through its hypothetical application of a criminal case in Fairfax County‚ Virginia. These various theories of justice arose from how society should go about restoring the social contract. The social contract theory states that society
Premium
Collective bargaining midterm study guide Chapter 1 (Organized Labor and the management Community -Many employees today view unions as not being only too strong but also outmoded and unwanted by workers. -The right of workers to unionize and bargain collectively‚ free of employer restraint or coercion has been protected by statute since the mid-1930s -Many unions now have been completely accepted - The State of the unions today - American federation of labor congress of industrial organizations-
Premium Trade union
Universality and Reversibility: Justice and Fairness The categorical imperative incorporates two criteria for determining moral right and wrong: universalizability and reversibility. Universalizability means the person’s reasons for acting must be reasons that everyone could act on at least in principle. Reversibility means the person’s reasons for acting must be reasons that he or she would be willing to have all others use‚ even as a basis of how they treat him or her. That is‚ one’s reasons
Premium Immanuel Kant Justice Distributive justice
Plea Bargaining University of Phoenix CJA/373 – Criminal Court Systems Mario D’Adamo Week Four - Individual Assignment July 14‚ 2010 Plea Bargaining Introduction Much of the criticism leveled at the legal system in general and the criminal justice system in particular is well-deserved‚ but one feature of the criminal justice system poorly understood and thus unfairly judged by both the public and the media‚ is the process of plea bargaining. Because criminal defendants have no incentive
Premium Crime Criminal law Law