NIRMA UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF LAW CASE ANALYSIS Mallella Shyamsunder V. State Andhra Pradesh Course Name: Evidence Law B.A.‚ LL.B. (Hons) SEMESTER-VII Under the Guidance of: Mr. U. Vardharajan Assistant Professor Submitted By: Manushi Yadav (11BAL127) Introduction This appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh‚ whereby the High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellants herein and confirmed the order dated 30.03.2005
Premium Evidence law Andhra Pradesh
1 2 CASE NOTE: AUSTRALIAN CRIME COMMISSION V STODDART1 I INTRODUCTION The High Court of Australia held in Australian Crime Commission v Stoddart (2011) that a privilege against spousal incrimination does not exist at common law. This provides that a spouse sworn in as a witness loses the right to call on the privilege to refuse to answer a question at the risk of incriminating the other spouse. This case note will outline the key issues of the case‚ analyze both the High Court majority
Premium Common law Law Crime
Danielle Trefz HONR259N 12 April 2011 Plessy v. Ferguson In 1892‚ Homer Plessy‚ a man of 1/8th African descent‚ bought a first class ticket and boarded a train traveling within Louisiana. Upon discovery of his mixed heritage‚ the conductor ordered him to move to the designated colored car. He was arrested when he refused to move; a violation of The Separate Car Act which required separate but equal accommodations for African Americans and Whites on railroads. Thus began the fight against the
Premium Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Plessy v. Ferguson Brown v. Board of Education
Abstract In the case of White v. Gibbs‚ the plaintiff‚ Mrs. Debbie White‚ sued O’Malley’s Tavern alongside Patrick Gibbs. Gibbs served as bartender at the tavern during the night in question. Mrs. White seeks settlement under the state of Indiana’s Dram Shop Act. Under the Dram Shop Act‚ a bartender assumes liability to any persons injured who were served alcohol while exhibiting obvious signs of intoxication (Todd‚ 1986). Since the two parties reside in different states‚ the case was brought to the
Premium Civil procedure Plaintiff United States
McWilliams V Dunn Supreme Court of the United States Introduction The Dunn v. McWilliams case is a famous court case that was heard before the supreme court of United States in April 24‚ 2017. The case involved James McWilliams as the petitioner against Jefferson Dunn was the commissioner and was representing the Alabama department of corrections. The focus of the case was the sixth amendment of the US constitution was useful in providing for the right to the assistance of an attorney to represent
Premium United States Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution
Your Name: Marcos Zuniga Case Name: California v Hodari Citation: 499 U.S. 621 Date Decided: 1991 Area of Law: Fourth Amendment Vote: 7/2 Scalia delivered the opinion of the court‚ in which justice Rehnquist‚ CJ‚ joined and White‚ Blackmun‚ O’ Conner‚ Kennedy‚ and Souter‚ JJ‚ joined. Stevens‚ filed a dissenting opinion‚ in which Marshall‚ J.‚ joined Procedural History: California v Hodari first proceeding were through the juvenile courts. Hodari tried to suppress the evidence relating
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States United States Constitution
The conclusion of Scott v. Sandford was considered the worst judgment Chief Justice Roger broke Taney ever composed. He disregarded constitutional points of reference‚ misshaped history‚ forced an inflexible instead of an adaptive development on the constitution‚ overlooked particular awards of power in the constitution‚ and tormented implications out of other‚ more-cloud provisions. His rationale on the citizenship issue was maybe the most convoluted. He conceded that African Americans could be
Premium American Civil War United States Constitution United States
finish secondary school or continue their studies further. During 1954‚ in Topeka‚ Kansas‚ the Supreme Court came to a critical decision that students would no longer have to be separated in school depending on race. This first dated back to a case entitled‚ Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896‚ which first allowed students to be separated by race. This short story caught my attention when given the assigned reading. I felt an instant connection to it considering that my father was faced with great difficulties
Premium Race High school College
Case Brief: Sutter v. Hutchings Case Name‚ Citation & Court: Sutter v. Hutchings‚ 254 Ga. 194‚ 327 S.E.2d 717‚ Georgia Supreme Court‚ decided 1985. Parties & Procedural History: Trial Court level: Plaintiff Sutter sues Defendant Hutchings. Defendant filed summary judgment motion‚ and court granted judgment in favor of Defendant. Plaintiff appealed. First appeal: Ga. Court of Appeals affirmed judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals again to Ga. Supreme Court. Facts: Mrs
Premium Appeal Law Court
You asked me to prepare an Objective Legal Analysis of how Jones v Tsige applies to the Cuthbert`s case. Specifically‚ how the Cuthbert`s use of the nanny cam may both invade and not invade their nanny’s privacy. Background Facts The present case concerns Ryan and Angela Cuthbert. Ryan is a self-employed individual who operates a plumbing company‚ while his wife‚ Angela is presently on the maternity leave‚ but is scheduled to return to her previous employment at the CFO of a Crown Corporation at
Premium Marriage Family Love