removal of caveat. One of the co-owner of the land deposit the title with R to secure a loan. Before the deposit of title with R by the said co-owner‚ the co-owners of the land agreed to subdivide the land and later on to execute a cross-transfer. Collector of Land Revenue asked R to deliver to him the title of the IDT so that he can sub-divide the land. R did so. R later enforced the lien -- by lodging a caveat over the undivided half-interest of the said co-owner in the land. The caveat was registered
Premium Property Ownership Property law
Chapter 2 Overview of the Financial System 2.1 Multiple Choice Questions 1) Every financial market has the following characteristic: A) It determines the level of interest rates. B) It allows common stock to be traded. C) It allows loans to be made. D) It channels funds from lenders-savers to borrowers-spenders. Answer: D 2) Financial markets have the basic function of A) bringing together people with funds to lend and people who want to borrow funds. B) assuring that the swings in the business
Premium Bond Stock market Stock exchange
We choose the lien holder’s caveat as the most suitable caveat to be lodged by the bank as lender is because of it is lodged by a person with whom the document of title has been deposit as security for a loan. The continuance of the lien-holder caveat will not be possible if the lien ceases to exist‚ e.g. caveator ceases to have the custody of the title. A lien-holder caveat may be withdrawn by the caveator or cancelled by the Registrar when all sums are paid or by court’s action if its entry or
Premium Property Legal terms Ownership
Name: Harry Atkins Consumers‚ Credit and the law of agency 1. A) Explain the main provisions of the Sale of Goods Act 1979 and the remedies available to consumers against sellers; The Sales of Goods Act 1979 is “a contract whereby the seller transfers or agrees to transfer the property in goods to the buyer for a money consideration called the price (s 2(1))” (Keenan. D‚ 2000‚ page 251). The Sales of Goods Act is designed to enforce rules when selling and buying goods to ensure that both parties
Premium Contract Law
25 page manuscript‚ which including 5 pages of caveats. Recently‚ the editor requested me to limit the manuscripts to 20 pages. It is impossible to shorten other places. As the auditor of manuscripts‚ I am in a dilemma. I am considering whether to eliminate 5 pages of caveats or not. If I choose to satisfy editor’s requirement and cut 5 pages of caveats‚ I may face the result of possible misunderstanding from readers. Appropriate findings and caveats are important to the interpretation of my research
Premium Management Audit Internal control
linked up with that reference certificate of title copy of the folio that goes to registered proprietor lists everything easements and restricted covenants dealings broad term applies to any instrument able to be registered except caveats there are approved forms for any transaction some scope for amendment but cannot change the substance of the form once registered has the effect of a deed (RPA s36) registration creates the legal interest RG is entitled to refuse to register
Premium Property law Property Easement
questions: What does caveat emptor mean? According to this doctrine‚ who is responsible for Stella Liebeck’s burns? Explain. Does the fact that she’s seventy-nine years old make it more difficult to justify a caveat emptor attitude in this case? One aspect of the caveat emptor doctrine is that it maximizes respect for the consumer as an independent and autonomous decider. Could that be a reason for affirming that a seventy-nine-year-old is a better candidate than most for a caveat emptor ethics of consumption
Premium Burn Coffee Physician
Indefeasibility * The conclusiveness of the register & bars ’retrospective investigation of title’ aimed to achieve security and simplicity in matters of title to land * Protection of purchaser – they are ‘paramount from unregistered interests’ but still are bound by registered interests * Frazer v Walker – ‘indefeasibility of title is convenient description for the immunity from attack by adverse claim to the land or interest in respect of which he is registered‚ which
Premium Easement Contract Property
applicants upon hearing of How’s bankruptcy‚ entered into lien holders’ caveat against the titles deposited with them as security under the provisions of S 330 of the NLC in order to secure their rights as lien holder. They applied for an order for sale. The official assignee (on behalf of How) opposed to this application pursuant to S47 of Bankruptcy Act read together with S 281 of NLC. He claimed that at the time of the bankruptcy‚ no caveat has been entered in respect of the land. Applicants’ arguments:
Premium Bankruptcy Property
advertising and merchants lie somewhere with Machan’s idea of the merchant ethic‚ meaning that the buyer is trying to make the sale‚ however the seller needs to be honest as a business person and may not mislead or deceive‚ but they do not need to tell all. Caveat Emptor must play a role‚ meaning the buyer must beware‚ and a salesman does not have to obligation to tell all. I feel that a business person/merchant/advertiser does not need to straight up tell for instance the shortcomings or complaints about their
Premium Morality Ethics Moral