Preview

Wgu Rit1 Task 1 Score 4.0 Essay Example

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
676 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Wgu Rit1 Task 1 Score 4.0 Essay Example
Application of the Expectancy Theory As Judge describes in Organizational Behavior, the Expectancy Theory, initially developed by Victor Vroom, proposes that an employee can be motivated to maximum levels of performance when a manager can match the organizational rewards to the personal goals. The personal goals are those that they are attractive to individual employees. In order to achieve this, Vroom examines the three key components and relationships that take place between the following aspects of the employer-employee relationship: individual effort, individual performance, organizational rewards, and personal goals. The first component is the effort-performance relationship, or expectancy, which refers to the perception of an individual employee that they are able to exert the levels of effort required to reach a desired level of performance. The second component is the performance-reward relationship, or instrumentality, which is the individual employee’s belief that performing at the desired level facilitates the attainment of particular organizational rewards. The third component is the rewards-personal goals relationship, or valence, which looks at the ability of those organizational rewards to help that individual achieve their personal goals and whether or not those goals are particularly attractive to the individual. In practice, the Expectancy Theory might describe the habits of a good sales person at a company with clearly defined sales goals. The sales person wants to send their children to a good college and so they strive to meet their sales goals and maximize their attainment of spiffs and bonuses. This same structure keeps the sales person focused on the needs of the customer rather than just selling snake oil. If they sell the customer on products or services for which they are not well suited or which are of low quality then they threaten their chances of return business from that same customer. This would ultimately detract from

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Let1 Task 317.1.1-06

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The expectancy theory was developed by Victor H. Vroom in 1964 as a systematic explanation of individual motivation within the workplace. This theory put forth three key components: expectancy, performance, and valence. From the base component of the theory, which is expectancy, behavior is built by an individual’s value of the reward or valence. Vroom’s theory of expectancy is used by manager to understand how individual employees are motivated and how they will respond to rewards closely tied to the tasks given. Expectancy is proposed to be an individual’s understanding of how their effort leads to a given performance level. Vroom put forth in his theory that individuals believe the more effort put into a task or objective, the better the performance on the task. Therefore, effort leads to performance or E  P. This effort is closely related to the individual’s belief that they can perform the given task (self-efficacy), whether they believe the task is perceived obtainable, and the individual can control the goal or performance. If the result of a strong effort is a good or exceptional performance, than the result of good performance should be a given outcome, P  O. This outcome should be a reward tied closely to the task and performance. A reward that is tied significant to the performance will help to motivate the individual’s effort. The third key factor of Vroom’s expectancy theory is valence. Valence refers to how much value the individual places on the reward, V(R). Again, the reward should be tied to the outcome, but without a perceived value by the individuals, performance will not put forth any effort to begin with. A summary of the Vroom’s expectancy is seen with the following notation. (Web site, Expectancy Theory, 2013)…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    case study

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages

    2. Explain the motivation of these three employees in terms of the Expectancy Theory of motivation.…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stratgic

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages

    vi. Planning is setting performance expectations and goals for individuals to direct personal efforts toward achieving organizational objectives.…

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is based on self-interest individuals who want to achieve maximum satisfaction and who want to minimize dissatisfaction.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kovach, K.A. (1980), “Why motivational theories don’t work”, SAM Advanced Management Journal, Vol. 45 No. 2, Spring, pp. 54-9. Kovach, K.A. (1987), “What motivates employees? Workers and supervisors give different answers”, Business Horizons, Vol. 30 No. 5, September-October, pp. 58-65. Leibman, M. and Weinstein H.P. (1990), “Money isn’t everything”, HR Magazine, Vol. 35 No. 11, November, pp. 48-51. Levesque, P. (1987), “Employee motivation: a little recognition goes a long way”, Industrial Management, Vol. 11 No. 1, February, pp. 35-7. Locke, E.A. (1968), “Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives”, Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance, Vol. 3, pp. 157-89. Locke, E.A. and Latham, G.P. (1990), A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance, PrenticeHall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Lord, R.G. and Kernan, M.C. (1989), “Application of control theory to work settings”, in Herschberger, W.A. (Ed.), Volitional Action, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, North-Holland, pp. 493-514. Lovio-George, C. (1992), “What motivates best?”, Sales and Marketing Management, Vol. 144 No. 4, April, pp. 113-14. Lussier, R.N. (1997), Management, South-Western College Publishing, Cincinnati, OH. Maidani, E.A. (1991), “Comparative study of Herzberg’s two-factor theory of job satisfaction among public and private sectors”, Public Personnel Management, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 441-8. Nicholson, N., Schuler, R., Van De Ven, A.H., Cooper, G. and Argyris, C. (Eds) (1995), Encyclopedic Dictionary of Organizational Behaviour, Blackwell Ltd, Oxford, pp. 330-9. Schneider, B., Ashworth, S.D., Higgs, A.C. and Carr, L. (1996), “Design, validity, and use of strategically focused employee attitude surveys”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 49, pp. 695-705. Schriesheim, J.F. and Schriesheim, C.A.…

    • 7793 Words
    • 32 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Employee Motivation

    • 2351 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The subject of motivation is a well-researched topic and many motivational theories have been written over the years. One in particular developed by Victor Vroom in 1964 still has application in today’s business environment (Quick 1988). His expectancy theory on motivation is a mathematical model based on three factors: expectancy, instrumentality, and valence. . All must work together to be highly successful, and all three together can have a powerful affect. The formula is Motivation = Expectancy * Instrumentality * Valence as illustrated in Figure 1.…

    • 2351 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Organizational Leadership

    • 534 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One of the appealing characteristics of expectancy theory is that it provides clear guidelines for increasing employee motivation by altering the person’s E-to-P expectancies. (McShane & Von Glinow, 2008, p. 144). I believe the E-to-P component of the expectancy theory is where I will focus. The objective of this theory is to increase the belief that employees are capable of performing the job successfully. (McShane & Von Glinow, 2008, p. 145). This is the expectancy that deals with effort-to-performance, and since the employees already feel they can perform their jobs more efficiently and are satisfied with the reward they now receive, the next step is to help them achieve what they are already motivated to work toward.…

    • 534 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Valence, instrumentality and expectancy (VIE) theory had resulted from Vroom’s (1964) work into motivation. His argument was that crucial to motivation at work was the perception of a link between effort and reward. Perceiving this link could be thought of as a process in which individuals calculated first whether there was a connection between effort and reward and then the probability (valences) would follow from high performance (instrumentality.) The motivational force of a job can therefore be calculated if the expectancy, instrumentality and valence values are known. The individual’s abilities, traits, role perceptions and opportunities attenuate the motivational force.…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    motivating

    • 2669 Words
    • 27 Pages

    L E A R N I N G O U T L I N E (cont’d)…

    • 2669 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Wabba, M. A., & House, R. J. (1974). Expectancy Theory in Work and Motivation: Some Logical and Methodological Issues. Human Relations, 27 (2), 121-147.…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Employee Motivation

    • 3002 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Leon Reinharth and Mahmoud A. Wahaba(Sept 1975). Expectancy theory as a predictor of work motivation, effort, expenditure and work performance. The Academy of management journal, vol.18 No.3, pp520-537. Accessed [17/10/2011]…

    • 3002 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This chapter introduces the core theories of employee motivation. It begins by introducing employee engagement, an increasingly popular concept associated with motivation. This definition relates to the four cornerstones of individual behavior and performance identified in the MARS model which was discussed on chapter 2. MARS means Motivation, Ability, Role Perceptions, and Situational Factors. Next, this chapter distinguish between drives and needs wherein I’ve learned how needs are shaped through the individual’s self-concept and other personal factors. On this topic, needs-goal-directed forces that people experience are shaped by the individual’s self-concept (including personality and values), social norms, and past ebxperience.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Managing People

    • 4043 Words
    • 17 Pages

    7. Green Thad B, (1992) Performance And Motivation Strategies For Today’s Workforce, Guide to expectancy motivation theory application, p-1.…

    • 4043 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Vroom's Expectancy Theory

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There have been several behavioral theories studied to understand how to be effective in improving performance in the work place. These theories are better described as management theories. One theory in particular, which we will discuss further, is Victor Vroom’s Expectancy Theory. This theory focuses on motivation. Motivation is the key and will be achieved if an employee feels that their hard work and efforts will lead to a job well done, which will then lead to an outcome rewarding the employee. The theory is that the level of effort and motivation is based on the product of these three key factors: expectancy, instrumentality, and valence. (site) Expectancy suggests that the efforts of work will result in a performance goal. So, the employee in a given situation must believe that the harder efforts they put forth, the better performance will be achieved as a result. This involves having belief in the organization and managers. It seems this employee and manager relationship should have a good foundation of trust and appreciation for the expectancy and motivation to be evident. The next factor is called instrumentality. The employee should also believe that the better performance achieved will lead to a reward for the associated outcome. Finally, the last key is called valence, which is the value of this reward to the employee. A manager should understand that the reward offered for the performance must be…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays