In 1983 a professor of education at Harvard University, Dr. Howard Gardner, developed the theory of multiple intelligences. This theory states that there are eight different ways in which a person is intelligent. These different forms of intelligence are as follows: linguistic, or word smart; logical-mathematic, or reasoning/numbers smart; spatial, or picture smart; bodily-kinesthetic, or body smart; musical, or music smart; intrapersonal, or self-smart; and naturalist, or nature smart (“Multiple Intelligences” para. 1-2). It is not difficult to pinpoint which of these intelligences standardized testing primarily measures. For students who are not linguistically or mathematically gifted, the tests do not accurately show the students’…
(Myers, 2010, pg 406) Since the mid-1980’s, some psychologists have sought to extend the definition of intelligence beyond Spearman’s and Thurstone’s academic smarts. “Howard Garner views intelligence as multiple abilities that come in packages”. (Myers, 2010, pg 407) Robert Sternberg agrees that there is more to success than traditional intelligence, and he agrees with Gardner’s idea of multiple intelligences. “However, he proposes a triarchic theory of three, not eight. They are analytical intelligence, creative intelligence, and practical intelligence”. (Myers, 2010, pg 411) The author David Myers discussed that intelligence test scores maybe misinterpreted as literal measures of a person’s worth and potential. He argued that we must remember the competence that general intelligence tests sample is important, but it only reflects one aspect of personal competence. Our practical and emotional intelligence are important too, as do the other forms of creativity, talent and character. Genetic and environmental influences shaped our intelligence, and thus there are many ways of being successful, our differences are variations of human adaptability. (Myers, 2010, pg 439)…
For decades, a lot of emphases have been put on certain aspects of intelligence such as logical reasoning, math skills, spatial skills, understanding analogies, verbal skills, etc. Researchers were puzzled that while IQ could predict to a significant degree of academic performance and to some degree, professional and personal success, there was something missing in the…
Isaac Asimov wrote an article titled, “ What is Intelligence, Anyway”. In this article Asimov begins the endless endeavor of defining intelligence. Asimov believes there are two types of intelligence. He begins to explain how some people have the talent of memorization and critical thinking. Others have minds that can imagine something and create or repair it to its magnificent structure. Asimov’s theory is proven to be true, for there are two different sides of the brain. Each side controls two different types of thinking. The first is the right side, which is used for creative thinking. The second is the left this is used for logical thinking. It has been proven that young children harness more power from the creative side. Since schools generally teach towards logical thinking as children grow older more than half of the population use logical thinking. This has a tremendous impact on human intelligence. This shows that people can be equally intelligent but their intelligence can lay in different areas along with the idea that intelligence is something that is not fixed but can be increased. Many would argue that talents and intelligence are not the same thing. However, talent is just a predisposition to be successful in a certain venture. This…
Intelligence is an intrapersonal phenomenon, that is inside a person and it is generally agreed that the nature of this energy is unknown. Nevertheless, it may be known by its mental products (Groth-Marnet, 1997; Wechsler, 1939). Because there are many different ways to be intelligent there have also been many different definitions proposed (see Neiser, et al., 1996 for summary). A consensus on what constitutes intelligence is generally lacking. Alfred Binet (1908), the author of one of the first modern intelligence tests, defined intelligence as the inclination to take and maintain a specific direction, and capacity to adapt to achieve a goal outcome, and the power of autocriticism (Kaplan, & Saccuzzo, 2005). In contrast, David Wechsler, the developer of the Wechsler scales, defined intelligence as the aggregate capacity to act purposefully, think rationally, and deal effectively with the environment (Wechsler, 1958 as cited in Kaplin, & Saccuzzo). A review by Sternberg, (2005) of intelligence literature over the past century by psychologists and intelligence experts reveals two…
Within human societies, there are elements of social interaction and logical problem solving. Some individuals are known to their friends as very smart people who can fix problems. If these smart people are not know to their friends or their community, does their talent reach its full potential? Cognitive intelligence refers to the skills that people have to logically comprehend their world and problems. It covers not only academic skills such as reading and writing, but also just generally making sense of what is happening at any given time. Cognitive Intelligence can be an indicator of performance success, people who are quite smart are likely to have good ideas and perform tasks well. Emotional Intelligence, is a second facet of individual difference that will be identified and compared to Cognitive Intelligence. “Emotional intelligence is the native ability one has to sense one's own…
In this paper I will compare and contrast Spearman 's Model of Intelligence and Gardner 's Multiple Intelligence models. One theory of intelligence states that there is one general school of thought and the other theory believes there are multiple schools of thought. Spearman 's general ability, or a "g" factor, believe that this is the only factor that measures intelligence, whereas, Gardner 's multiple intelligence believes there are more than one factor (Wade & Tavris, 2006, pp. 322 & 328).…
First let me discuss intelligence; Intelligence can’t be pinned down to one central skill it is considered a very broad term. Spearman defines intelligence as well defined tests that correlate to give a measure of intelligence, a well known and widely used test is the intelligence quotient or IQ test (Eysenck 1971, p.53). On the other hand IQ according to Ashley Montague doesn’t measure intelligence; the make up of intelligence has no definitive term. Different circumstances form the abilities we name intelligence and without looking further into these circumstances such intelligence tests are worthless in measuring intelligence. Intelligence may be better defined as diverse accustomed abilities (Montague 1975, p.190). In the nineteenth century craniometrical measurements were used to measure intelligence however this type of technique has now been proven as incorrect science. The brain in mass, dimension and obscurity in the collection of variations have no merit to intelligence (Montagu 1975, p.191). Everything we understand and deduce as people we have understood from others. Research has proven individual experience moulds the growing brain and the later conduct of the person. The value of this individual experience is essential for the progression of analytical performance that we refer to as “intelligence” (Montagu 1975, p.191).…
Gardner, H. (2003, January 17). A Definition of Intelligence. Retrieved November 19, 2010, from City College of San Francisco: hhtp://www.ccsf.edu/Resource/VOICE/instructorlessonplans/personaldevelo/multintelligence/definitionabe.pdf…
Artificial Intelligence: Cognitive Ability or Information Processing Computers have become an integral part of our everyday lives. We rely upon these machines to perform innumerable tasks that we often take for granted. Most people realize that computers are able to perform the multitude of functions as a consequence of the programming they receive. These programs give computers a set of instructions that governs their transition from one information processing state to another. Thus, computational machines are able to respond to a certain set of inputs with a certain range of outputs. In order to comprehend programs one needs only to describe these instructions in functional terms. In this regard, computer programs are extremely similar to functional accounts of the human mind, which contend that in order to understand the mind, one must simply examine the relationship between stimulus and behavior. Consequently, the question has naturally arisen as to whether a computer which consisted of a sufficiently sophisticated program would be capable of thought. This question has resulted in lively debate, with one camp of people including John R. Searle emphatically denying the plausibility of Artificial Intelligence. On the other side of the debate, individuals such as Paul and Patricia Churchland have declared that although a serial machine with a program might not be able to think, Artificial Intelligence might be feasible in parallel processing computers. In “ Is the Brain’s Mind a Computer Program, “ John R. Searle presents an interesting argument against strong artificial intelligence proponents. Believers of strong artificial intelligence contend that a computer that can pass the Turing test is displaying cognitive ability. The Turing test basically states that if a computer can function in such a way that an expert can not distinguish its performance from that of a human who has a certain cognitive ability, such as the ability to understand a language, then the…
On the other hand, intelligence is defined as a very general mental capability that, among other things, involves the ability to reason, plan, solve problems, think abstractly, comprehend complex ideas, learn quickly and learn from experience. It is not merely book learning, a narrow academic skill, or test-taking smarts. Rather it reflects a broader and deeper capability for comprehending our surroundings-“catching on,” “making sense” of things, or “figuring out” what to do. (Gottfredson, 1997a, p.l13).…
Steinberg, B. (2011). DR. REUVEN FEUERSTEIN ON WHY INTELLIGENCE IS MODIFIABLE - See more at: http://brainworldmagazine.com/dr-reuven-feuerstein-on-why-intelligence-is-modifiable/#sthash.xjtgNWmZ.dpuf. Howard Gardner. Retrieved from http://brainworldmagazine.com/dr-reuven-feuerstein-on-why-intelligence-is-modifiable…
“I believe that the brain has evolved over millions of years to be responsive to different kinds of content in the world. Language content, musical content, spatial content, numerical content, etc.” (Dr. Howard Gardner, Brainy Quote). You are intelligent, believe it. You are unique, embrace it. According to Dr. Howard Gardner a psychologist and a researcher at Harvard University, there are eight multiple intelligences and everyone can identify themselves with them. Those are: Visual Spatial, Intrapersonal, Bodily- Kinesthetic, Naturalist, Linguistic, Logical-Mathematical, Musical, and Interpersonal Intelligences. While there are people intelligent in areas equal or different than others, everyone is smart and weak at something, and this is what defines a person. According to “A Multiple Intelligence Inventory” I am highly intelligent in the Musical and Linguistic area, but I also have a weakness: Naturalist, which I plan to strengthen.…
Intelligence is a well-researched avenue of psychology. Intelligence can be labeled as one’s ability to comprehend one’s environment and correctly adapt to it based on various cogitative processes by ways of reason, the ability to solve various problems, as well as seeking answers from resources. The way someone’s intelligence is comprehended can vary based on one’s culture thus explaining why there are so many different intelligent tests defining what is ingenious. Testing one’s intelligence has been the most provocative assessment done in the psychological field to date. The validity, the concepts behind nature versus nurture, as well as cultural prejudices are factors that could sway the discord by the use of articles that are related to intelligence.…
In Warwick’s “Into the Unknown,” he introduces the hypersphere model and goes into details on how one’s intelligence can be portrayed in “a wide range of axes (210).” First, he refers back the argument that he previously mentions, which demonstrates his acknowledgement on how it is improbable to achieve an objective IQ test when nearly everything becomes subjective in human’s standard. Then, he redirects his audiences’ attention by showing his ambitions on overturning this dilemma and suggesting researchers to measure the performance on every facility and make further analysis on how they closely relate to each other. He continues to build upon his groundwork by listing other possible instruments of intelligence, including “a score for math, a score for music, a score for art, motorcycle maintenance” to showcase his understanding in realizing each individual has their own strengths and weakness on different facilities (210). In “The Sociological Imagination,” Flynn complements Warwick’s framework by promoting the Gardner’s theory on intelligence. He lists the seven categories of intelligence and raises awareness on how they can be integrate and assimilate to our living. Flynn postulates, “Perhaps we have overlooked the fact that a Mozart integrates a wide variety…